U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken is about to visit China for four days, his second visit to China since taking office. Despite the tension between China and the United States, the mainland has always been very friendly to any country in the world, but there is no more information to offer other than welcome. So is Blinken's visit positive or negative? The G7 has given us a wake-up call. At the meeting of foreign ministers in Capri, Italy, Italian Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Tajani had already said before the start of the meeting that the G7 would try to shout the "voice of the West" that is, to discuss how to end the conflict in Ukraine and the Middle East. Whether it is the Russia-Ukraine conflict, the new round of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, or the tension between Israel and Iran, these are all key issues discussed at the G7 foreign ministers' meeting.
In this "difficult moment", according to Tajani, the G7 needs to maintain a "united" position, but the G7's position does not bring peace to Ukraine and the Middle East. He admitted that the pressure measures of Western countries on Russia are not enough to bring the conflict between Russia and Ukraine to an end, and it is very important for China to participate in the peace process. Without China's participation, peace between Russia and Ukraine cannot be achieved? China has good relations with Russia, and in the G7, including Italy, it is clear that they want to use Sino-Russian relations to broker a ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine.
It is worth mentioning that almost at the same time, US State Department spokesman Miller claimed that in the past few months, it was discovered that some materials had been shipped from China to Russia, and that Russia was using these materials to rebuild its industrial base and produce them for use on the battlefield in Ukraine. It is clear that the United States has begun to smear again. For a long time, China's trade with Russia has been normal trade exchanges, and what is sold is not military materials, but non-military weapons. On this issue, the United States always wants to block it completely, so has the country come up with evidence so far?
Moreover, what does the United States say about the United States' supply of a large amount of weapons and equipment to Israel, causing massive civilian casualties in the Gaza Strip? What should the United States say about even selling weapons and equipment to the Taiwan region in disregard of China's warnings? Don't be too double-standard. Taking a step back, even if China provides military supplies to Russia, the United States is not in a position to make irresponsible remarks. The United States knows best how the conflict between Russia and Ukraine broke out, and to put it bluntly, the most serious threat to the security of the world today is the United States itself. Over time, the United States has long been a source of instability in the world today. From this point of view, it is not so much that the G7 is helping the United States to cooperate and trying to force China and Russia to "break up", but that the G7 is reminding China and Russia that Blinken's visit to China this time is largely unkind. Therefore, in the face of Blinken's visit, the mainland must not have illusions, and must clearly realize that Sino-US relations will not be able to cool down at least for a short time.