laitimes

What's new in the Middle East: a bizarre attack

author:Drinking the moon in the west building

Today, in Kataib Babiliyoun, Iraq, the headquarters of an Iranian-backed militant group was bombed by drones. While the Israeli Ministry of Defense and the U.S. Embassy in Iraq both told the media that Israel/the U.S. had nothing to do with the attack, the Iranians chose to remain silent

What's new in the Middle East: a bizarre attack

This is the second time in the past three days that Iran and its followers have been attacked in a more "bizarre" way, the last time being in the central Iranian city of Isfahan.

It was reported that the Israeli Air Force had dispatched three improved F-35 fighter jets to deliver some kind of strike weapon at Isfahan, targeting Iranian air defense systems protecting nuclear facilities in the region.

Some media have obtained local satellite images from the Pentagon, which are said to be enough to confirm that the radar system at a distance of 2 kilometers from the nuclear facility was accurately hit.

What's new in the Middle East: a bizarre attack

It is very interesting that the Iranian Foreign Minister was attending a UN meeting in New York and was asked by a reporter on the way:

"Israel is now attacking targets inside Iran, is Iran ready to retaliate?"

The Iranian Foreign Minister replied: "Where? What Israeli attack?"

It seems that the Iranian side really wants to treat this matter coldly, and the big thing will be reduced to a small one, and the small thing will be reduced to nothing.

After all, the facts of the past decades around the world have amply proven that patriotic chicken blood can be fought, but not by the way.

Water can carry a boat, but it can also capsize a boat, and it will not be good if the boat capsizes.

What's new in the Middle East: a bizarre attack

It is worth mentioning that members of the U.S. House of Representatives yesterday passed a $95 billion aid bill, of which $26.4 billion was aided to Israel, which was passed by 368:58, which is higher than Ukraine's support rate.

This fully shows that the attitude of US imperialism towards the Middle East conflict is very clear: the United States will support Israel in completely eliminating Hamas.

In fact, this should also be the consensus of Western countries, which are sometimes forced to vote in favour of UN ceasefire proposals under pressure from their own populations due to humanitarian concerns at home.

Former British Prime Minister Boris Johnson once posted on social media that "if the West continues to collapse, then the Israelis will not be able to enter Rafah." They will not be able to achieve their goal: to end Hamas".

"Is this really what you want, do you want to give victory to a bunch of murderers and rapists?"

This can be described as a sentence.

In fact, from the very beginning, the Kazakh-Israeli conflict was a multiple-choice question with only two options:

1. Spare Hamas in order to avoid hurting the innocent, and let them roll their heads at a certain time;

Second, endure a certain number of civilian casualties, completely eradicate Hamas, and make lasting peace possible.

If you follow your heart, then no matter which one you choose, it is worthy of respect. But if you think that it is only because the US imperialists support it, then it is too much.

Some people say that 1% of a person's awakening depends on other people's reminders, and 99% depends on a thousand cuts.

I think that a nation is actually the same, and there seems to be no shortcut in the middle.

This does not mean that a foolish people should be slashed with a thousand swords in order to awaken them. But if this ignorance means barbarism and killing, that's a different story.

Text/West Building Drinking Moon

If you want to give, please click on the '...' in the top right corner to appreciate, thank you for your support!

What's new in the Middle East: a bizarre attack

Read on