Is the veto power of the five benevolent men granted by the United Nations or the Security Council?
No. It should be said that the veto is recognized and endorsed by the United Nations, but it is not given by it. Why?
"I am freedom, I am human rights, I am democracy, and those who do not obey my edicts are the enemies of freedom, human rights, and democracy!"
Let's take an example: a certain enterprise A in a certain country, strictly control the quality of products, whether the products produced are 1/10,000 spot checks, 1/1000 spot checks or 100% full inspections, can not detect any substandard products, which has lasted for more than 20 years, so the competent department B of enterprise A has included enterprise A in the "list of quality inspection-free enterprises".
So, is the excellent quality control level of enterprise A given by the competent department of B? No? B can also not give A the exemption treatment, then it will still be sampled, and it will still pass every time, and the result will be the same, but A and B have spent a lot of trouble and trouble.
The veto is a similar situation.
Because on the international stage, although the five good people can't do whatever they want, they can definitely do what they want. What happens if a country does not recognize the veto of the Five Good Men?
"What's the use of keeping the planet if Russia is gone?"
Let the country that is not satisfied with the veto be X, and it has put forward a proposal Y.
When the number of P5 votes against = 1: X will find that even if it does not comply with the Security Council resolution and forcibly pushes forward Y, it will face all kinds of overt and covert resistance, strong resistance, and invincible resistance, and in the end, X can only return in vain, y=0;
When the P5 votes against = 2: X will find that what it wants to advance has just started and ended, y=0;
When the number of P5 votes against = 3: X will find that y = 0;
When P5 votes against = 4: y=0,X1→X2;
When P5 votes against = 5: y = 0, X = 0.
"If the young man can't comprehend the mystery of the "community of shared future for mankind", he will also know a little bit about his fists and feet~"
In short, as long as there is something that a great good person disagrees with, no matter how long it takes to toss and how hard it takes, it will definitely not be able to do it.
Some good people opposed it, and some good people agreed with it, and the result was that the proposal was gone;
Some good people oppose it, another good people abstain, the proposal is gone, and the government is gone;
The five good people unanimously opposed it, the proposal was gone, the government was gone, and the country was gone.
"The afterglow of the sun still lights up the sky!"
Therefore, the United Nations should come forward -- just give them a veto! Let them use the veto to show their attitude, so that everyone can know where the bottom line and the red line are, so as not to break their heads and bleed their heads by reckless and reckless, and also let the good people save some fists and feet, and let everyone have some dignity.
So, is the veto power given by the United Nations or the Security Council? No. They only make the proposition that "the five constants must be able to forbid what they want to forbid" as an axiom and omit the process of proof, and do their best to dissuade all stunned people who want to verify the truth of this proposition;
So, is the veto just the prerogative of its owner? It is also a life-saving guide to protect non-P5 countries from touching high-voltage lines.
"Charlemagne, the Sun King, Napoleon's blood is still rushing!"
So do you think a veto can be applied?