laitimes

Whether the Taishan team's penalty profit in this round is a major misjudgment is finally an authoritative conclusion

author:The forefront of Chinese Super League sports

Shandong Taishan team met Cangzhou Lions in this round of the Chinese Super League, and the team defeated the opponent 4-1 after 90 minutes of fierce battle. The Tarzan team's 4-1 victory over the opponent made many fans feel relieved, because the team has not experienced the feeling of a big victory for a long time. At the same time, the Taishan team also let coach Cui Kangxi get out of the class crisis. The Taishan team's mediocre record and injuries during this period of time have made Cui Kangxi controversial.

Whether the Taishan team's penalty profit in this round is a major misjudgment is finally an authoritative conclusion

Many fans pointed the finger at Cui Kangxi's unscientific training, which led to the Taishan team being full of wounds. Fortunately, Cui Kangxi did not fight back head-on in the face of doubts. On the contrary, Choi Kang-hee proved himself by leading the Taishan team to a 4-1 victory in this round. The Tarzans also won a penalty in this game, when the Tarzan team fired a powerful shot that caused the opponent's goalkeeper to get out of his hands.

Whether the Taishan team's penalty profit in this round is a major misjudgment is finally an authoritative conclusion

Liu Yang quickly plugged in and prepared to shoot, and the moment Liu Yang kicked the ball out, Cangzhou Lions forward Wenda put the former down. The referee on duty gave a penalty to the Taishan team through VAR replay, determined that Wenda had committed a foul. Fernando took the penalty to help the Taishan team extend the score again. So, is there any controversy that the Tarzan team won this penalty?

Whether the Taishan team's penalty profit in this round is a major misjudgment is finally an authoritative conclusion

Judging from the replay, when Wenda was fighting with Liu Yang at that time, it was obvious that he couldn't reach the ball. If Wenda can get the ball, he won't go for Liu Yang. As a result, Wenda still put down Liu Yang with his foot when he couldn't hook the ball at all, and there was no doubt that it was a penalty. What's more, the referee also determined that Venda did commit a foul through VAR replay, which means that this penalty is not controversial.

Whether the Taishan team's penalty profit in this round is a major misjudgment is finally an authoritative conclusion

Whether the Taishan team's profit through penalties is a misjudgment, now there is finally an authoritative conclusion, which can also make Shandong fans raise their eyebrows. Before, the Taishan team always suffered unfair losses from the referee. I didn't expect that the Taishan team could rarely get a fair penalty from the referee in this round, so that the team could successfully get a penalty. This shows that the Football Association has set up a review team to verify each round of controversy. I hope that the Taishan team will continue to perform well in the future and become one of the champions of the Chinese Super League as soon as possible.