Brother Liu
Editor|Brother Liu self-media
First, the new exploitation in the age of robots
In the age of robots, we may think that exploitation is a thing of the past, after all, robots do not suffer or complain about exhaustion. However, is this the case? Robots have replaced human production, but this does not mean that exploitation has disappeared, but that new forms of exploitation may emerge. Imagine if robots took over all jobs, would there be a group of unemployed people on the margins of society and the objects of exploitation?
The author mentions the productive forces formed by the capitalization of labor surplus, a concept that is well worth pondering. The emergence of robots has indeed increased productivity, but to whom will this surplus value flow? Perhaps in the past, we thought that surplus value mainly went to capitalists, but in the age of robots, the situation may be different. Will the capitalists obtain more surplus value through the operation of robots? Or will the production and maintenance of robots also need to be supported by the labor surplus of laborers? The possibility of this new type of exploitation deserves our serious consideration.
The advent of robots has undoubtedly changed the mode of production, but the problem of exploitation has not disappeared. On the contrary, the age of robots may give birth to new forms of exploitation, which require our vigilance and thinking.
Second, labor surplus and technological development
How has historical technological development been closely related to the capitalization of labor surplus? This question may be somewhat abstract, but we can explain it with a vivid example. Imagine how the advent of machines in 18th-century English textile factories changed the way production was done. At that time, how did James Hargreaves, the inventor of the Jenny loom, rely on the capitalization of labor surpluses to continuously improve the textile machine, so as to increase productivity? These improvements were not achieved overnight, but required continuous input and the accumulation of labor surpluses. Therefore, the development of technology does not exist in isolation, but needs to be supported by the capitalization of labor surplus.
The same is true of the capitalization of labor surpluses in the field of modern science and technology. Using smart factories as an example, we can see how robotics and technological developments are closely related to labor surplus. In a smart factory, the operation of robots requires a lot of technical support and maintenance, and the investment and cost cannot be ignored. Although the advent of robots has increased productivity, this increase is not without cost, but is based on labor surplus. Therefore, we can say that the development of technology is inseparable from the support and promotion of the capitalization of labor surplus.
The relationship between labor surplus and technological development is a mutually reinforcing process. The development of technology needs the support of the capitalization of labor surplus, and the accumulation of labor surplus promotes technological progress. This interaction makes us have to consider the role and impact of labor surplus while discussing the development of robotics and technology.
Third, enterprise development and capitalization of labor surplus
Taking Zhang Xinghai's entrepreneurial story as an example, we can see how the capital accumulation in the process of enterprise development depends on the capitalization of labor surplus. Zhang Xinghai has gradually developed from a small entrepreneur with a starting capital of only 8,000 yuan to an entrepreneur with an investment of tens of billions of yuan, and the key to this is the capitalization of labor surplus. Imagine, when Zhang Xinghai was young, he founded Chongqing Baxian Phoenix Electric Spring Factory, with only a starting capital of 8,000 yuan, which may not even be enough to pay the rent of a small shop, but it is with the accumulation of labor surplus that he was able to grow his business step by step.
From the initial capital to the investment of tens of billions of yuan, this process demonstrates the key role of labor surplus capitalization in the development of enterprises. Through continuous business accumulation, Zhang Xinghai converted the surplus labor into capital and invested it in the development of the enterprise, so as to realize the vigorous development of the enterprise. This process may not be easy, but it is this effect of capitalization of labor surplus that allows enterprises to continue to grow and become leaders in the industry.
It can be said that the relationship between enterprise development and the capitalization of labor surplus is inseparable. It is the hard work of the workers and the accumulation of surplus value that provide a steady stream of financial support for the development of the enterprise. Zhang Xinghai's entrepreneurial story vividly demonstrates this, and his success is not only the result of personal diligence, but also an important embodiment of the capitalization of labor surplus in the development of enterprises.
Through the analysis of Zhang Xinghai's entrepreneurial story, we can understand more deeply the close connection between enterprise development and the capitalization of labor surplus. Whether it is a starting capital of 8,000 yuan or an investment of tens of billions of yuan, it is inseparable from the support and accumulation of labor surplus. The role of this kind of capitalization of labor surplus is not only reflected in the development process of enterprises, but also profoundly affects the operation of the entire economy and society.
Fourth, the relationship between technology and exploitation
In exploring the relationship between technology and exploitation, we need to recognize that the impact of technological development on the relationship of exploitation is complex and multidimensional. While technological progress can increase productivity, whether exploitation can be eliminated is an in-depth question. Both historical and real-world cases have shown that technological developments often do not eliminate exploitation, but rather alter the forms of exploitation and may even exacerbate some forms of exploitation.
Historically, for example, technological progress during the Industrial Revolution brought about a huge increase in productivity, but at the same time, it also intensified the exploitation of workers. Factory owners took advantage of the introduction of new technologies to speed up the production process and increase output, but workers worked in worse conditions, worked longer hours, paid lower wages, and did not reduce the level of exploitation. This suggests that technological development does not necessarily mean the elimination of exploitation, but may change the manner and extent of exploitation.
In real life, we can also find similar examples. With the spread of smart technology, more and more jobs are being replaced by robots, which has sparked discussions about whether the era of artificial intelligence will eliminate exploitation. However, the reality is not so simple. Although the popularity of robots has increased production efficiency, it has also led to the loss of a large number of workers, exacerbated the gap between the rich and the poor, and the problem of exploitation has not been fundamentally solved. This suggests that technological developments may change the forms of exploitation, but they do not necessarily eliminate exploitation itself.
Therefore, we need to recognize the complex relationship between technology and exploitation. Technological progress can increase productivity, but under capitalism, this increase in productivity is often used by capitalists to intensify the exploitation of workers, rather than to achieve common prosperity in society. In order to truly eradicate exploitation, in addition to technological progress, it is necessary to change the social system and economic structure to achieve true social equity and justice.
To sum up, the relationship between technology and exploitation is a complex and profound issue. Technological developments can change forms of exploitation, but they cannot eliminate it entirely. To achieve common prosperity in society, more social reforms and institutional innovations are needed to ensure that technological progress works for the benefit of all people, rather than for the benefit of the few.
The first rights protection on the whole network has been opened, and plagiarism must be investigated!
Do you think I'm right?
You are welcome to write your message in the comment area!
If you think this article is valuable, inspiring or helpful to you, please give me a like and comment! Your support is the biggest motivation for my creation, thank you!