Loading...
Text: See
Edit|Today's Affair
In this eventful autumn, a "surprise inspection" of Shenzhen urban management has become the focus of heated discussions. Imagine you're quietly renovating your home and suddenly a group of people in uniform break in and raise the banner of the law to fine you and stop your work because you don't wear a hard hat. This is not a joke, this is an absurd drama that really happened in Shenzhen!
On an ordinary afternoon on April 17, a resident in Shenzhen was engaged in a very daily activity - installing a wardrobe. However, the peaceful life is shattered by a sudden knock on the door. Outside the door, a group of urban management team members entered the venue "sonorously", as if tracking down a serious case. Their eyes seem to be full of "justice", but this justice is because the renovation workers are not wearing hard hats.
As soon as the chengguan team entered the door, they didn't say much, and directly announced the stoppage order. The decorators looked at each other with bewildered faces. One worker tried to explain: "This is my home, and it's not a high-risk construction site." But the chengguan didn't seem to buy it, and resolutely responded: "The rules are the rules, safety is no trivial matter, you must wear a hard hat!" Then, in the midst of a plea, the chengguan wrote off hope, leaving a ticket and a feeble sigh.
When the video and news circulated on the Internet, public opinion immediately exploded. Netizens ridiculed: "Shenzhen urban management is in the lead, and even the air in the house has to be managed!" There are also voices that asked: "Do you have to consider wearing a helmet when changing a light bulb at home?" However, there are also rational voices pointing out that even if some workplaces are indoors, they do need to wear safety helmets to ensure safety, but the question is, is it really a high-risk operation to install a wardrobe?
Chengguan's response: Laws and regulations, in the face of the turmoil, the chengguan responded that their actions were carried out in full accordance with the relevant laws and regulations on production safety, aiming to ensure personal safety. However, this interpretation did not completely quell the public's discontent, and many began to question the applicability of the current regulations and the humanization of law enforcement.
This incident is not only a simple helmet issue, but also a profound reflection on the logic of law enforcement and public management in our society. While pursuing legal norms, we should pursue the fairness and humanity of the law, otherwise, the absurdity of Shenzhen today may be staged in any corner tomorrow. For Shenzhen's chengguan, this may be a rare opportunity to re-examine and adjust their law enforcement strategy to make it more reasonable and humane.
As soon as this incident came out, it undoubtedly made people think again: what kind of "security" do we need, and what kind of city management do we need?