A great place to watch football: live sports events and replays are free to watch| Link3
One
On April 17, Beijing time, the CBA officially announced the punishment results of a large-scale clash between the Shanghai team and the Beijing team in the first round of the playoffs.
The details are as follows:
Dai Hao, a player of the Shanghai team, was suspended for two games and fined 50,000 yuan, Fang Shuo, a player of the Beijing team, was suspended for two games and fined 100,000 yuan, and Zeng Fanbo, Fan Yiming, Zhai Xiaochuan, and Zhu Yanxi, players of the Beijing team, were each suspended for one game and fined 20,000 yuan.
Liu Peng, the head coach of the Shanghai team, and Zhang Yunsong, the first responsible person of the Beijing team, were fined 20,000 yuan respectively.
As soon as the news came out, it immediately caused heated discussions among fans.
Among them, it is mainly focused on the punishment results of Fang Shuo.
The CBA officially gave a suspension of 2 games and a fine of 100,000 yuan.
In this regard, everyone generally feels that this punishment result is too light.
First of all, this conflict itself was provoked by Fang Shuo.
The Beijing team made a free throw from the bottom line, Fang Shuo advanced with the ball, and Liu Zheng fouled in order to delay the attack.
Whether it is from the tactical intent or the action itself, it is more reasonable.
However, after being fouled here, he came back immediately and frantically "output" to Liu Zheng who was sitting on the ground.
At that time, it was really confusing to many fans.
It was a particularly normal "tactical foul", why did Fang Shuo get so angry.
It was precisely because of this that Dai Hao on the side couldn't look at it, and walked over and pushed Fang Shuo.
Then, several players from the Beijing team also joined in.
At this point, the two sides launched a large-scale "conflict".
If Fang Shuo hadn't chased after Liu Zheng and made such an operation, this conflict could have been completely avoided.
He, the initiator, deserves to be punished heavily.
Secondly, he "locked his throat" on Dai Hao.
Normally, even if everyone doesn't control their emotions for a while and can't help but move, then at most they are pushing each other.
For the purpose of modern basketball to "participate in civilized competition", this is already very impressive.
However, in this conflict, Fang Shuo directly made a "throat lock" action to Dai Hao.
Anyone who watches the ball knows how dangerous this action is.
Because the neck and above are relatively fragile parts of the human body, a little carelessness will cause a catastrophe.
Moreover, this action is also very "provocative", and to put it bluntly, it is a bit of a bully.
There is a high probability that because Dai Hao is a young player, he will take care of him as a "soft persimmon".
Through the above, you can see how bad Fang Shuo's ball is.
Two
In the regular season last season, the final round against the North Control team, it was Bledsoe and Ma Yong who clashed.
After the game, the CBA officially imposed a four-game ban and a fine of 140,000 yuan on Bledsoe.
In this comparison, Bledsoe is really wronged.
First of all, it wasn't the dispute he completely took the initiative to provoke, it was that both of them had body movements, and Bledsoe's reaction was a little more intense.
Secondly, he didn't make too much action, just waved his arm, and then was hugged tightly by Wang Zhelin and pulled aside.
Whether in terms of scene or nature, it is not as good as Fang Shuo's this time.
However, Fang Shuo received a much lighter punishment than Bledsoe.
If nothing else, let's just say that it is only a two-game ban and a four-game ban, which is not a "magnitude".
Of course, we are not talking about "justice" and "controversy" here, we are just talking about "regret".
If it weren't for the harsh punishment of Bledsoe, then Li Chunjiang and Li Nan would not have had such a thing.
The two of them were really good managers and they just ruined their careers.
I have to say, it's a pity...