I've always been positive in believing in response to the stimuli that forced me not to believe, because realistically, I often have a lot more to gain by believing than by "refusing to believe".
Of course, believing is not unconditional, but believing is more than not believing.
More demanding conditions.
Before believing something, we must first understand why this thing can gain our trust.
This question is very realistic, and this very real problem,
But it makes some ignorant people ridiculous.
Some people have watched some videos, and those who are dressed up talk eloquently, saying specious things, and saying that in addition to selling good, they are creating anxiety, how can these videos be credible evidence?
Conversely, what is the cost of believing in these people?
We don't need to be deliberately sober, let alone emphasize what it means to be in a state where "everyone is drunk and I squint", but only to see in what kind of attitude the arrogant and pathetic rhetoric of those drunken mental addicts is spreading the disgusting stench.
Facts are irrefutable, but everyone uses the facts in a way that
It's to each according to what he needs.
For example, as ordinary people, if we want to gain reliable trust, we must be able to see the corresponding evidence, as well as a reputation that is sufficient to guarantee, and observe it in combination with our own social experience.
To give a simple example, in many spy war movies, anyone with a little IQ will not completely believe or deny a person because of the appearance of "something", and after the continuous increase and decrease of evidence and constantly revised judgments, a person's position and its value can be slowly revealed.
Belief in a thing, or a person, commitment is not the only condition,
But if you can't even fulfill your promises, there will be no later tests.
For example, in real life, some people's statements are capricious, which seems to be a test, but in fact, they don't count in their hearts, and they can't gain real trust, which is the inevitable price for themselves.
If we add warmth to this topic, we will find that those who make people lose trust are the lack of trust caused by the inability to fulfill promises, or the easy abandonment of promises.
And those promises that are exploited and deliberately manipulated become "reasonable" scams.
Deceived once, deceived twice, deceived more and more,
Naturally, there are fewer and fewer people who believe:
Interestingly, often such beings will continue to use promises to deceive with a firm attitude, and their core argument for the scam is to blame those who do not believe.
"Why don't you try again?"
Promises are not scams, but scams often start with promises.
The trust torn away is irretrievable, but the price of betrayal is paid by those who are honest.
I don't want to say fairness, because fairness doesn't need to be said at this point.
So, when people treat those crazy spiritual hawkers with contempt,
Don't ask why people don't believe it, but think,
Those disdainful eyes, what kind of betrayal they have endured.
When people begin to resent the ugly performances of those who pretend to be smart,
Don't ask why you "don't introspect", but ask your own heart,
It is not worthy of the meaning of the word introspection.
When the sober man begins to abandon the entangled preaching, to abandon the ignorant arguments,
Don't care why they are impatient, but think about those who have been disappointed again and again,
The responsibility of the word patience or not.
In our world, we should not let those who are responsible and sober-minded bear all the costs and obligations.
And the fact is not only that, but it will also become even worse, and it will be pointed at by those who have bad intentions or are incompetent and conceited, and make trouble everywhere.
So, what do we have to lose?
Or rather,
What do we have to lose at this moment?