laitimes

The 86-year-old man married his first love, and there was a sentence in the couplet that made people sigh, I would not be moved by such love

author:I-in-hsien

There are always some stories on the Internet, which are unbelievable and shocking, but some stories are not fictional plots, they are real realities, and they are lives.

This time, I saw the story of the 86-year-old man marrying his first love, many people expressed their emotion, thinking that the old man's emotions are rare, and it is fate to be able to meet and come together again.

The two old people are both in their early 80s, so this means that most of their lives have passed, and as for the previous half of their lives, it is also conceivable whether they have the original match.

If they don't marry or get married, and each other is the first marriage, then such persistence is touching, beyond reproach, and worthy of praise. But if the two of them have been married, the words they said afterwards are somewhat intriguing.

The 86-year-old man married his first love, and there was a sentence in the couplet that made people sigh, I would not be moved by such love

(The pictures in this article are all from the Internet)

Sixty years of Lao Yan flew apart, this sentence was written on the couplet between the two at the time, at first glance it looks very affectionate, but the affection of the two of them, how many people are ruthless? This sentence is really embarrassing!

Literally, sixty years is a real number of years, so two people separated in their early twenties, and have been thinking about each other since then, or can't they be together because of practical reasons?

I believe that two people who have never been married, under normal circumstances, will not wait until such an age to meet, and it is easy to find someone who wants to find each other, after all, this is no longer the ancient times when cars and horses were closed.

For two people, what do they regard as the other half? If the former other half gives birth to children for him, then what kind of mood does his child feel when he sees his father's other marriage?

The 86-year-old man married his first love, and there was a sentence in the couplet that made people sigh, I would not be moved by such love

Of course, as a child, we should always be happy for our parents, the father has found true love, and it is the father's own right to be with the first love again, and the children should respect and bless it, but what about the mothers of the children? If they have been carefully taught and nurtured by their mothers, what about the children?

It is easy to preach true love, but to emphasize that 60 years of separation is disrespectful to each other's former love, is it that the past marriage is all improvised? If this time it was true love, and the last time was also true love, then what is the standard of true love? Is it a good decision for oneself to be made by one's heart, or is it a long-term regret that cannot be sought?

The 86-year-old man married his first love, and there was a sentence in the couplet that made people sigh, I would not be moved by such love

It is true that the two old men can continue to walk together at such an age, which is a gratifying thing for both parties, but from the perspective of onlookers, such a story is not a perfect story, and such a love is not worth touching me.

First love, how beautiful the existence is, people will inevitably have some regrets, and they will also pursue the images of the past in their memories, but when regrets are filled up and replaced by reality, I don't know if the sweetness of the past can also be copied to reality one to one?

I always believe that no matter how many objective factors there are in the separation of the past, it is caused by human subjective decisions, because you can choose not to let go, and you can also insist on love.

The 86-year-old man married his first love, and there was a sentence in the couplet that made people sigh, I would not be moved by such love

But the love that used to be without the intervention of external factors, so it will not be able to stay together, which does not mean that the love has disappeared, but this must prove that at least at that moment, the first love is not the most important thing in life, there are other things that are more important than the first love, so the trade-off is also the path that the individual chooses for himself.

Sixty years is the concentration of time, not the concentration of feelings, in the sixty years that these two people have not been together, there are other people involved in the life of the two first loves, no matter how sixty years of companionship, should not be forgotten, love is love, respect is also love.

Read on