A storm of public opinion triggered by juvenile delinquency
On a sunny afternoon in April 2024, at an online forum in Changsha, Hunan Province,
Loading...
A post titled "The Supreme People's Court Has Recently Tried Juvenile Cases, and the Age of Criminal Responsibility Has Aroused Heated Discussions" quickly attracted widespread attention.
The post referred to a series of shocking cases of juvenile delinquency, which were not only egregious in nature, but also involved minors under the age of 14. The news caused a stir on the Internet, with netizens expressing surprise and indignation, and a heated discussion was launched on the issue of whether the age of criminal responsibility should be lowered.
In the four recent cases, the suspects are all between the ages of 12 and 13 and are expected to face severe penalties of 10 to 15 years in prison for suspected serious crimes. The verdict has sparked widespread controversy among netizens, with some arguing that it is a necessary deterrent to juvenile delinquency, while others are concerned about whether such a sentence is too harsh and whether juveniles should be given more opportunities to rehabilitate.
Loading...
As the discussion deepened, netizens began to examine the issue from different angles. Doubts have been raised about the responsibility of guardians, arguing that in many cases of juvenile delinquency, the negligence or negligence of guardians is a factor that cannot be ignored. Some netizens quoted the ancient saying "If the son does not teach, the father is at fault", emphasizing that guardians should bear certain responsibilities. However, some netizens believe that although guardians have certain responsibilities, the minor's own growth environment and social impact are also important considerations.
The SPC's stance and the society's repercussions
With the frequent occurrence of juvenile crimes, the discussion of the current law in society has become more and more intense. In this society governed by the rule of law, people have high hopes for the protection and education of minors, and at the same time, they have given a certain degree of tolerance to the consequences of their actions. However, several recent cases are serious in nature, violating the bottom line of society and raising questions about the effectiveness of juvenile law.
Against this background, the Supreme People's Court has made a swift and clear statement on such cases. According to this reporter's understanding from the Supreme People's Court, the court has tried four criminal cases involving minors, and the offenders are concentrated between the ages of 12 and 13. In these cases, the courts tried the suspects in accordance with the law and finally rendered a verdict in accordance with the law, and they were held criminally responsible in accordance with the law and sentenced to 10 to 15 years in prison.
The Supreme People's Court's judgment has aroused strong repercussions in society. Netizens have said that this punishment not only played a role in calming the people's hearts, but also played a good warning role. They praised the SPC and believed that the verdict reflected the importance that the law attaches to juvenile crimes. It was pointed out that the egregious nature and social impact of these cases could not be ignored and that the court's decisions were a safeguard of social justice.
At the same time, some netizens expressed different views on the verdict. In their view, although the verdict shows the majesty of the law, it is also a question worth pondering whether the age of criminal responsibility should be further lowered. It has been suggested that the 10-year-old as a threshold of criminal responsibility may require more discussion and argumentation.
Controversy and reflection on the age of criminal responsibility
With the announcement of the SPC's verdict, the discussion in society has gradually shifted to the issue of the age of criminal responsibility. The landlord posted on the forum to call for a lower age of criminal responsibility, hoping to attract widespread attention. This proposal quickly caused heated discussions among netizens, and everyone expressed their opinions and concerns.
Some people believe that with the development of society and the early physical and psychological maturity of adolescents, minors aged 12~13 already have a certain degree of discernment and behavioral control, so they should bear corresponding criminal responsibility. They cite psychological research that shows that adolescents are already able to understand and predict the consequences of their actions at this age.
However, some netizens objected to this. They argue that although adolescents' physical maturity may be advanced, their psychological maturity and judgment are still limited. These netizens mentioned that the provisions of the juvenile law are to protect minors from being punished excessively because of impulsive or immature behavior. They are concerned that lowering the age of criminal responsibility prematurely could lead to unfair treatment of minors.
The lowering of the age of criminal responsibility in the past two years has caused a lot of discussion, and some netizens mentioned that the social repercussions at that time did not fully support this change. They believe that the law should be stable and continuous, and should not change frequently, otherwise it may cause social discomfort and legal chaos.
During the discussion, some netizens mentioned the responsibilities of guardians. They believe that in many cases of juvenile delinquency, the negligence or negligence of the guardian is a factor that cannot be ignored. Guardians shall be responsible for the conduct of minors, and guardians shall be held accountable. However, there are also those who believe that although guardians have certain responsibilities, the minor's own judgment and capacity are also important factors.
Social repercussions and support for the SPC's judgment
The SPC's judgment has evoked strong repercussions in society. Netizens have said that this punishment not only played a role in calming the people's hearts, but also played a good warning role. They praised the SPC and believed that the verdict reflected the importance that the law attaches to juvenile crimes.
A netizen said: "The bad nature and social impact of these cases cannot be ignored, and the court's judgment is a safeguard of social justice." I believe that the occurrence of juvenile delinquency can only be effectively deterred by severe punishment for criminal behavior. ”
Another netizen said: "I believe that the Supreme Court's verdict is fair. They took into account the specific circumstances of the case and also paid attention to the growth and education of minors. This verdict sends a clear signal to the whole society that everyone is equal before the law and no matter how old or young anyone is, they cannot escape the punishment of the law. ”
Some netizens also mentioned that the announcement of the verdict gave the society a satisfactory answer, and also gave the victims and their families a fair result. They believe that such a sentence will help maintain social stability and fairness, and also help warn other minors to stay away from crime.
In the discussion, the responsibilities of guardians were also mentioned. They believe that in many cases of juvenile delinquency, the negligence or negligence of the guardian is a factor that cannot be ignored. Guardians shall be responsible for the conduct of minors, and guardians shall be held accountable. However, there are also those who believe that although guardians have certain responsibilities, the minor's own judgment and capacity are also important factors.
An in-depth discussion of guardianship responsibilities
When discussing juvenile delinquency, guardianship responsibilities have become a hot topic of discussion. Netizens generally believe that in many cases of juvenile delinquency, the negligence or negligence of the guardian is a factor that cannot be ignored. Guardians shall be responsible for the conduct of minors, and guardians shall be held accountable.
A netizen asked the question: "In the case of juvenile delinquency, should we pay more attention to the role of guardians? After all, guardians are the guides on the road of minors' growth, and they shoulder the heavy responsibility of educating and caring for minors." ”
Another netizen replied: "It is true that guardians play a vital role in the growth of minors. They must not only ensure the safety of minors, but also guide them to establish the right values and codes of conduct. If the guardian fails to perform his or her duties well, then they should bear some responsibility for the minor's criminal behavior. ”
However, there are also those who have a different view on this. They believe that although guardians have certain responsibilities, the minor's own judgment and capacity to act are also important factors. One netizen said: "We can't just blame the guardian, minors should also learn to take responsibility for their own actions." After all, they have reached an age where they can understand and predict the consequences of their actions. ”
This round of discussions on juvenile delinquency and guardianship responsibilities has made more people pay attention to the role and social responsibility of guardians. In the process of protecting the rights and interests of minors and maintaining social justice, guardians, society and schools all play an important role. Only through the joint efforts of all parties can we create a better environment for minors to grow up and build a harmonious society together.
One netizen put forward this point: "In the case of juvenile delinquency, we cannot rely solely on legal means to solve the problem. What is more important is to prevent it at the source, which requires us to work together to create a healthy environment for minors to grow up. ”
Another netizen said: "Indeed, social harmony is inseparable from the efforts of each individual. Each of us should assume our social responsibility, pay attention to the growth of minors, and provide them with positive guidance and support. ”
During the discussion, some netizens mentioned the importance of family. They believe that the family is the first and most important environment for the growth of minors. The influence of parents' behavior and parenting style on minors is crucial. Therefore, parents should pay attention to their words and deeds, lead by example, and set a positive value and behavioral example for minors.
At the same time, schools also have an important educational responsibility. Schools should not only provide intellectual education, but also pay attention to cultivating minors' moral values and sense of social responsibility. Schools may guide minors to form correct values and codes of conduct by offering relevant courses and organizing practical activities.
In addition, society should also provide a healthy environment for minors to develop. The media and social organizations may organize various activities to raise society's attention to the growth of minors and guide them to form a positive attitude towards life.
In general, building a harmonious society requires the joint efforts of each of us. Whether it is guardians, schools, families or society, we must assume our responsibilities and provide support and guidance for the healthy growth of minors. Only in this way can we build a harmonious and beautiful society together.
What do you guys think about the comments!
Statement: Taken from the Internet