On the evening of April 13, Iran launched a large-scale air strike against Israel through a careful calculation of the deployment location, maximum interception capacity and maximum firepower channel of the Israeli air defense interception system. The specific process has three phases: first, missile strikes, in which Iran launched two rounds of about 150 ballistic missiles and cruise missiles, focusing on Israeli military targets in the Negev Air Base, Jerusalem, Beersheba, and Dimona; second, drone attacks, in which Iran launched four rounds of about 500 drones against Israel; third, in the post-war stage, Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps issued a statement clearly pointing out that the strike was in retaliation for Israel's "bombing" incident, warning that the United States would make a "decisive response" if it intervened in IranAt the same time, the Iranian mission to the UN spoke out that the attack on Israel could be considered "over". The whole process took only 24 hours, and Iran has "explained" to itself, the Islamic world, and the international community with practical actions.
In the face of a saturation attack by Iran's aerial firepower, Israel has been unable to support itself, and the United States and Britain have come to an end at a critical moment. At 7 a.m. on April 14, US fighter planes first "entered the war" and coordinated with the Israeli Air Force to go straight to the skies over Syria and Iraq, intercepting about dozens of drones. With the intervention of the US-British coalition forces, this military game between Iran and Israel has become a "hybrid war" between the United States, Britain, Iran, and Israel, and Israel's backers are all in place.
From an international moral point of view, Israel's attack on the Iranian Embassy in Syria preceded Iran's retaliatory actions against Israel and was justified, and the fate of the United States and Britain was a typical example of "aiding and abetting" Judging from public opinion, Israel wantonly brutalized civilians in Gaza during the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, and its hands were stained with the blood of at least 30,000 Palestinians, and it has become the target of the international community. In addition, Iran, as the 14th largest country in the world in terms of military power, also has strong industrial strength and strategic depth, is the United States and Britain really willing to stand up for Israel's geopolitical ambitions at the cost of shaking their national capital?
On April 14, the White House made its attitude clear and reaffirmed its "firm support" for Israel, and U.S. Secretary of Defense Austin had a phone call with Israeli Defense Secretary Garant, but according to U.S. media, U.S. President Biden had a phone call with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu not long ago, saying that the United States does not support Israel's counterattack against Iran. The United States is well aware of the lessons of the war in Afghanistan, and once it is once again mired in the quagmire of war in the Middle East, China and Russia will usher in a period of strategic opportunity for at least several years, and at the same time, in the context of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, the Islamic world is unprecedentedly cohesive, and the enemy of the United States is not only Iran itself.
Israel is well aware of what the United States wants, but the purpose of the Israeli army's attack on the Iranian embassy is to take the initiative to lead the war and pull the United States into the water to solve Israel's geopolitical crisis. On April 14, Netanyahu said that "whoever hurts us, we will hurt him", and the Israeli Ministry of Defense claimed that a large number of fighter jets were ready to fight back against Iran. On the 14th local time, the senior commander of the Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps said that if Israel takes any action against Iranian territory, Iran will respond with double force.