Recently, a restaurant in Dalian, Liaoning Province sparked heated discussions among netizens because of the word "girl" marked in the ordering notes.
Some netizens broke the news that when they ordered food, they found that they were labeled as "girls" by the store, and they couldn't help but wonder if such a note meant that their meal volume would be "shrunk".
After all, any form of differential treatment is not so fair on the premise that everyone pays the same price.
To say that this store is also quite creative, to classify customers by gender, it seems to be intimate, but in fact it is a bit overstepping. The reaction of netizens was also quite intense, saying: "We are all consumers, why do we have to divide men and women?"
Some netizens bluntly said: "If you are afraid that you will not be able to finish eating, then directly make a small portion, the price is cheaper, and we will choose it ourselves." ”
In the face of netizens' doubts, the store also quickly stood up and explained. The owner said that the reason why he gave the "girls" the note was because he was worried that they would waste money if they didn't finish eating.
There is also a sign in the store that reads "Our store adds noodles for free", which means that you can add if you can't eat enough, but don't waste food. This explanation sounds reasonable, but the question is, why do they think that girls can't finish it? This gender-based stereotype is obviously not appropriate.
The Market Supervision Bureau made it clear that stores cannot label gender, which involves the protection of consumer rights and interests, and the store also said that it will not be labeled again in the future.
However, the store's next remarks are a bit confusing. The shopkeeper actually said that he felt that customers should not be harassed for such a trivial matter, and if they harassed like this again, they would have to go to the customer's school to find the school leader.
Loading...
As soon as these words came out, netizens exploded even more. Some netizens joked: "Is this going to stage a realistic version of 'looking for parents'?" and some netizens bluntly said: "The attitude of the store is also hardcore enough." ”
Reduction = Reduction
Incomprehensible
In fact, this matter is not big or small. On the surface, it was a controversy caused by a simple ordering note. But digging deeper, it touches on a series of sensitive topics such as gender equality and consumer rights protection.
In this day and age, any form of sexism is not accepted. Consumers should enjoy the same services and treatment when they pay the same price, which is the most basic principle of fairness.
For stores, if they want to reduce waste and improve customer satisfaction, they can achieve it in a more reasonable and humane way.
For example, offer different packages for customers to choose from, or provide free top-up services. Wouldn't this not only meet the individual needs of customers, but also avoid waste?
What do you think about this?#春日生活打卡季#
Video, picture source network