The state really doesn't want to raise the pensions of peasants anymore, there is no need. They have lived in the countryside all their lives. You can grow your own vegetables and grains. It doesn't cost much at all. Besides, the environment in the countryside is good, and the elderly live a long life and don't get sick much. What do you want so much money for?
Isn't it angry to hear such words, as a rural person?
But don't be in a hurry to spray me, this sentence is not what I said. This is what a so-called city man said in a WeChat group that he inadvertently joined some time ago.
In an instant, it caused everyone's public outrage.
The city man always felt that the peasants were self-sufficient and did not need a pension.
In his opinion, rural people have little expense. And rural people don't have any financial concepts, even if you give him a pension. He will also save it and leave it to his children, and he is reluctant to spend it at all, so it is better not to rise.
I don't know what you think when you hear that, but I'm really sad in my heart.
What happened to the peasant? Wasn't his ancestor a peasant?
As a native farmer, I really want to say a few honest words.
We do have land, and we can grow our own grain and vegetables, but only we know the hardships.
Working in the fields under the sun, eating steamed buns and drinking river water. Every day, I have to look at the weather, and I don't pay attention to it a little. The year's harvest is gone.
Now the conditions in the countryside are better, at least not hungry, but at the age of the parents' generation, how can there be enough land for the family to eat?
It's nice to have a bowl of gruel to drink.
Besides, even if there is a bumper harvest of grain in the field, how much money can it be sold? It is not as much as the salary of a person in a big city.
I left enough food for the family to eat, and the little money I had left to sell. Then get rid of the purchase of seeds, fertilizers, pesticides and other household items. How can there be anything left?
Who can understand the sadness and helplessness in this?
In addition, the older generation also has to pay public grain, and if the food is not enough, they can only add some wild vegetables.
My dad said that if they had steamed buns to eat at that time, they would already be Amitabha, where did they still think that they could fill their stomachs?
Let's talk about going back to the present.
Why don't you raise the peasants' pensions?
At present, the aging of the rural areas is very serious, and the people left behind in the villages are all old people in their seventies and eighties, and the young people who can move all go out to work to support their families. Hungry.
These old people. There is no one around to take care of it, so I can only be self-sufficient, so I look forward to that pension.
What can you do with 120 yuan a month? Even steamed buns with pickles may not be enough.
I heard that the pension will rise every year, although the amount is small, but at least it will rise year by year, and it can also give everyone a hope.
But I really hope that this increase will be faster, faster.
After all, the old man's time is running out.
I only hope that they can enjoy more benefits in the rest of their lives, so that their lives can be better.
Perhaps, some people will think that the peasants should demand that the state pay pensions without compensation.
I just want to ask, can these old people, their contributions to the country in the past, really be measured in money?
In that era of material scarcity, they paid public food, and as long as the country called, they could contribute all their belongings.
Isn't it worth raising the pension of such a rural elderly?
Do you agree with me?