This is today's Malatang channel, thank you for your support for me, a newcomer to the headlines. I hope that friends who come will like, forward, and comment more, and wish everyone a "good year of the dragon and rolling money" in the new year.
Loading...
Recently, U.S. officials said that a large number of Chinese immigrants choose to live and develop in the United States. However, the United States is reluctant to ease travel restrictions for its citizens to China. This unfair practice has aroused heated discussions and questions among the majority of netizens, and many people said, "Who is more weak-minded?"
First of all, we need to be clear that migration is a complex social phenomenon that involves a number of factors, including individual choices, national policies, and the international environment. It is understood that in recent years, 3.7 million people have immigrated to the United States, of which Chinese immigrants account for 4.8%, that is, 177,000, and an average of 35,000 Chinese have become American citizens every year. With China's rapid development and the improvement of its international status, more and more Chinese have a broader vision and more opportunities to pursue their dreams. At the same time, some people have also chosen to emigrate overseas for various reasons, which is their personal right and we should respect and understand.
However, when some people choose to leave, it does not mean that all people hold this idea. In fact, there are still many people who are full of love and confidence in China's culture, history and society, and they are willing to contribute to the prosperity and strength of the motherland. Moreover, with the continuous development of China's economy and the continuous improvement of its international influence, I believe that more people will choose to stay and build a better homeland together.
Returning to our topic, we cannot but feel regret and disappointment at what the United States has done. As a great power, the United States should embrace different cultures and people with an open mind, rather than treating them in a discriminatory and restrictive manner. Such a practice not only violates the spirit of international law and human rights, but is also detrimental to friendly exchanges and cooperation between China and the United States.
Netizens' attitudes towards this matter are also very clear and consistent. Many expressed support for China's position and policies, believing that the United States should ease travel restrictions to China so that the people of the two countries can more easily understand and communicate with each other. They believe that friendship and cooperation in the true sense of the word can only be established through mutual understanding and respect. There are also some netizens who believe that many of these Chinese immigrants have left with huge sums of money, and we need to be wary of capital outflows, and some people say that people can leave, but the money must stay!
Of course, there are some who disagree. They believe that the U.S. has the right to set its own immigration policies and travel restrictions, and that these policies are based on national security considerations and other factors. However, we must point out that any policy must be formulated and implemented in accordance with international law and fundamental human rights principles and must not undermine the interests and dignity of other countries.
In conclusion, I would like to say that no matter what the outcome of this matter is, we should maintain a rational and objective attitude to look at the problem. In today's increasingly close world, exchanges and cooperation between countries have become an irreversible trend. We should embrace different cultures and groups with an open and inclusive mind, and jointly promote the progress and development of human society.