The lineup of judges caused controversy: "Avenue of Stars" became a gathering place for "bastards"?
Introduction: Revealing the shady scenes behind variety shows
Hello everyone, today I want to talk about a popular variety show in the entertainment industry, "Avenue of Stars". Have you ever noticed that the jury lineup in this show is a bit "weird" recently? Yes, you heard it right, on this stage that was supposed to be a hot spot for the draft, more and more "bastard" judges broke in, causing the audience to talk a lot. So, what's going on? Let's uncover the shady curtain behind this entertainment industry!
Professionalism is questioned: the jury is growing in size
First of all, we have to admit that "Avenue of Stars", as a long-standing talent show, does provide a stage for many musicians and performers to show themselves. However, as time went on, the show's jury lineup became larger, and more and more "bastard" judges who were not professional musicians appeared. Their appearance has raised widespread questions about whether they have the qualifications and ability to evaluate the players, which has become the focus of everyone's attention.
Homogenization of judges: and the mud into the wind affects the perception
What's even more worrying is that with the increase in the number of "bastard" judges, the evaluation of the program has become more and more homogeneous, and the judges often only follow the crowd and adopt a consistent attitude towards the performance of the contestants, rather than having the ability to think and judge independently. This phenomenon of harmony and mud not only seriously affects the quality of the program, but also makes the audience lose interest in the program, and even doubts the fairness and authenticity of the entire program.
Expectations and hopes for variety shows
As viewers, we want to see a real talent contest, not a jury flattering each other. We are looking for truly qualified and capable judges who can objectively and impartially evaluate the performance of the contestants, give pertinent advice and guidance, and promote the growth and progress of the contestants. Only in this way can the value and significance of variety shows be truly realized, so that the audience can truly enjoy the wonderful program content.
Personal views and expectations
As an entertainment practitioner who pays attention to the development of the entertainment industry, I am deeply worried and indignant. We live in a time full of temptations and challenges, but we also have a responsibility to protect ourselves and defend our dignity and rights. I hope that the relevant program producers can take this as a warning and choose really powerful and experienced judges, instead of randomly recruiting "bastards" for the sake of traffic. Only in this way can variety shows maintain high quality and high reputation in the hearts of the audience, and can the long-term development and sustained popularity of the show be realized. In the future, I hope to see a more professional and fair lineup of judges, so that the audience can truly enjoy the high-quality program content, and more potential contestants have the opportunity to show their talents.