The Voice and Coco Li's agency are torn apart, and the moral level is constantly controversial, what is the truth?
On April 7, The Voice of China unexpectedly appeared on the hot search list, but not because it apologized to Coco Li, but because it was about to sue Coco Li's agency in Shanghai. This news sparked strong indignation among netizens.
ACCORDING TO THE QICHACHA APP, THE CONTRACT DISPUTE BETWEEN SHANGHAI CANXING CULTURE MEDIA CO., LTD. AND WARNER MUSIC CHINA (HK) LIMITED WILL BE HEARD IN SHANGHAI NO. 1 Intermediate People's Court ON APRIL 9, 2024.
According to public information, Shanghai Canxing Culture Media Co., Ltd. is the producer of China's Voice program, and Warner Music is the agency of the late singer Coco Li.
Many netizens expressed their incomprehension and anger:
"Is there a mistake in who is being sued?"
"Shouldn't it be a good voice to apologize to Coco Li? Why did you sue the victim instead?"
"What did The Voice do to dare to sue Coco?" Some netizens bluntly said: "Sister Coco has been dead for so long, what do you want?"
However, some netizens have a rational attitude, believing that this is actually a contract dispute between The Voice and Coco Li's brokerage company, which has nothing to do with Coco Li personally, but just a lawsuit between the two companies for their own interests.
In fact, the reason why The Voice sued Coco Li was a contract dispute, indicating that there was a contractual disagreement between the two companies. As for whether the lawsuit is related to Coco Li's recording incident, it is not yet known. But there is no doubt that the lawsuit has once again pushed Good Voice to the forefront, raising widespread public questions about its integrity and morality.
The Voice's actions in suing Coco Li's agency have indeed sparked widespread controversy on a moral level. Judging from the general reaction of the public, many people believe that this behavior is not in line with moral principles, which side should they take?
First of all, after the exposure of Coco Li's recording incident, The Voice should have taken a more prudent and responsible attitude to reflect on his own behavior and the problems in the show, instead of choosing to fight Coco Li's agency through legal means. Such behaviour gives the impression of evading responsibility and ignoring public opinion, and runs counter to public expectations of fairness, integrity and respect.
Secondly, as a popular variety show, The Voice's influence lies not only in the show itself, but also in its impact on social values. However, this prosecution sends a wrong signal to the public, that is, when faced with problems, instead of actively solving and communicating, they choose to use legal means to confront and suppress them. This is obviously not conducive to the guidance of social morality.
Of course, we cannot conclude from public opinion alone that the behavior of a good voice is completely contrary to moral principles. After all, contract disputes are a common problem in business activities, and resolving them through legal means is also a common way. However, when dealing with such issues, more attention should be paid to openness, transparency and respect for the rights and interests of all parties in order to safeguard fairness and justice.
In the aftermath of the incident, The Voice took a series of measures to reflect on and respond to the relevant issues.
First of all, The Voice has conducted a more rigorous review of the production of the program and the selection of contestants to ensure that the principles of fairness and justice are observed. At the same time, the program team strengthened the psychological counseling and care for the contestants, providing them with necessary support and help to cope with the tense atmosphere and competitive pressure in the program
Second, in the face of public doubts about the fairness and transparency of the program, The Voice promised to take steps to reshape the fairness and transparency of the program. This includes clearly and objectively setting evaluation criteria to avoid biasing towards a particular style or preference, as well as strengthening review systems and procedures to ensure that the selection and selection process of players is more fair and equitable.
In addition, The Voice has also strengthened the improvement of the content and quality of the program, and paid more attention to the evaluation of the professional ability and artistic level of the contestants, so as to balance professionalism and artistry. Through rigorous judging and the guidance of a professional team, the program strives to cultivate musical talents with real strength and potential.
It should be noted that The Voice may also face some challenges and difficulties in the process of reflection and improvement. For example, how to ensure the effective implementation of improvements, how to balance the interests of all parties, and how to regain the trust of the public need to be carefully considered and properly addressed.
To sum up, the Voice's action against Coco Li's agency is indeed controversial on the moral level. As a variety show with wide influence, The Voice should pay more attention to the morality and social responsibility of its own behavior in order to establish a good public image.