Hello everyone, I'm at the tip of my fingers.,I don't know what you think about the transplantation of terminal games to mobile games.,If I'm the gamer.,Of course it's looking forward to.,It's like waiting for I don't know how many years of DNF is finally coming on.,But I'm worried about the same as LOL.,It's been transplanted.,But the taste has changed.。
Recently, another terminal game transplanted mobile game began the first test, and used the "over there" way to popularize its own heroes, obviously not a type of game, and the player group is not conflicting, so this kind of bright "rubbing" will not be disgusting, but the king player will have a sense of superiority, "Look, everyone uses the king to compare".
As an official of the king, this kind of behavior will not be cared about, but will be complacent because of its own influence.
In fact, in the more than eight years of the development of the king, I have also faced a lot of pressure, and I will come to a MOBA game against the king at every turn, and various settings contain a lot of "references", not to mention, but also play a "price war", or the kind of game that promotes the Japanese style of a certain division of a certain Beijing, which is really disgusting.
It's very novel to introduce new heroes in the way of kings, like this "Miss Walnut", obviously the target is the king's Yao Mei, and the unique "hanging on the head" statement is interesting, but this reminds me of some things that happened back then, after being hacked for so many years, it's really time to talk about it.
I don't know if you've read such an article, Yao Mei went online back then, but it took more than a year to go online, and during this period, there was a hole for "plagiarism", what is the matter?
There's a MOBA game called "Inhuman Academy", and many veteran players who think they've been immersed in the MOBA circle for many years haven't heard of it.
The public beta began on June 26, 18, and that time actually happened to be the peak of the king, and the king had been in public beta in 15 years, so "Inhuman" belongs to the latecomers, and there are many original heroes and skills, but the style of painting is completely different.
On April 16, 19, the king's Yao was officially launched, and many people didn't expect that Yao Mei would be out of the circle after it was launched, but they didn't expect to be named "plagiarism" by many people, because the possession mechanism was first used by a hero named "Dragon" in "Inhuman".
Judging from the timeline, although such a statement is unfounded, it is true that Yao belongs to the latecomers, but I can only be glad that Xiao Wang has not taken action to rectify those bloggers who broke the news at that time.
The jade-faced little white fox is a senior in the king author circle, at first he was a blogger who mainly broke the news, as early as a year before Yao Mei was launched, he discovered Yao Mei's skill introduction through the experience server unpacking, and posted this article in his account, the time is January 7, 18, everyone remember this time.
The "riding body" of the ultimate move is the same as the skill mechanism launched in the later stage, which shows that when it was exposed, Yao Mei actually had a certain prototype, and it was not just as simple as a new document.
The first time the "Dragon" hero was exposed in the non-human school park was 17 years on October 21, but at that time, only the design draft was exposed.,Not even the finished product.,It was only on December 15 of the same year that the mechanism of this possession was exposed during the live broadcast.。
So judging from the earliest timeline, the exposure mechanism of "Inhuman" is December 15th, and the earliest exposure of Yao can be found is the little white fox, January 7, 18, and it was only more than 20 days before and after.
It is obviously unrealistic to use more than twenty days to quickly complete a hero, so the conclusion is that although the king is not earlier than the non-human (maybe earlier, but there is no official announcement), it can at least prove that the two are heroes of the same period, and there is no plagiarism.
The rumors opened his mouth, refuted the rumors and broke his legs, I don't know if the author who advocated the plagiarism of the king at that time was really just to rub a mouthful of traffic or other reasons, so that Yao Mei had been carrying the pot for so many years was really wronged.
In addition, the possession mechanism is not quite a unique mechanism, and there have been related skill settings in early MOBA games, so it can be more obvious that the two have nothing to do with each other.
Plagiarism is hateful, but unfounded "plagiarism" is a bit irresponsible, although many years have passed, but every time I think of our king's hero taking the blame, my heart is always not good.