Thanks to Mr. Gu Hongyi for the manuscript
The original article was published in the Collected Journals of the Chinese Academy of History, Volume 2, 2023 (Volume 8), please indicate the source when citing
▼
A review of the authenticity of the "Theory of Distinguishing Adultery".
Text / Gu Hongyi
Institute of Ancient Books, East China Normal University
Abstract: The article "On Distinguishing Adultery" written by Su Xun has been quite controversial since its publication because it alleges that Wang Anshi is a "traitor". At the beginning of the Qing Dynasty, Li Fu and Cai Shangxiang believed that "On Distinguishing Adultery", Zhang Fangping's "Tomb Table of Mr. Wen'an", and Su Shi's "Xie Zhang Taibao Wrote the Book of the Tombs of the Ancestors" were all forgeries of Shao Bowentuo in the early Southern Song Dynasty, which had a great influence. In the 80s of the 20th century, some scholars wrote a long article to argue that "The Theory of Distinguishing Adultery" was indeed written by Su Xun and was not a forgery. Since then, many scholars have written articles to discuss and quote in detail, but due to relevant historical materials, research perspectives and other reasons, as well as due to the misreading, misinterpretation of texts and arbitrary extension in some treatises, it is difficult to reach a conclusion so far. Because the analysis of whether the "Treatise on Distinguishing Adultery" is a hypocrisy, involving the official system, the ritual system and the style of literati in the Song Dynasty, and is closely related to the style, compilation and edition, etc., this article examines in detail the relevant historical materials related to the "Treatise on Distinguishing Adultery", pointing out that none of the Northern Song Dynasty editions of Su Xun's anthology contain "On Distinguishing Adultery", the 40-volume "Complete Works of Music" that has been handed down today should not be compiled by Su Shi, and the "Shaw Brothers Wenjianlu" is not the first Song people's notes to mention "Distinguishing Adultery". The one praised as the "most rare book" by the Song people is the Gusu Jushi publication, and further studies the "Theory of Distinguishing Adultery" and "Tomb Table" There are many explicit or implicit errors in the texts of "Distinguishing Adultery" and "Tomb Table", especially in the "Tomb Table", "At the beginning of Jiayou, Wang Anshi's name was prosperous, and his party friends poured it out for a while", "His fate system said 'Since the birth of the people, there are only a few people'" and other words are seriously contrary to the historical facts at that time, so it is presumed that the "Theory of Distinguishing Adultery" Zhuwen is a pseudonym, and it is speculated that the author is probably a disciple of Sumen, and it is about to be written in the late period of Hui Zongzheng and the early Xuanhe period.
Keywords: Su Xun, "Discerning Adultery", Authenticity
1. Origin
The article "On Distinguishing Adultery" written by Su Xun (Zi Mingyun) was criticized by Wang Anshi for "adultery", so since the beginning of this article, there have been many controversies among scholars. Scholars generally think that it was not until the Qing Dynasty that Li Fu and Cai Shangxiang pointed out that the "Theory of Distinguishing Adultery" was a forgery by others, but in fact it was not. Wang Shizhen of the Ming Dynasty has a cloud in "The Book of Old Su Wenhou":
And the husband's "Identification of Adultery" ,...... Even if the language is made, the private name, the clothes are Julu, the dog eats, and the prisoner talks about the "poems" and "books", how do you know that they must be used, and how do you know that they will be the trouble of the world? Or Mingyun is in the Yongshu banquet, and tastes the rhyme poem with Jiefu; or Han, Fu and Yongshu Yang Mingyun is not palatable, and Jiefu is not alone, so he hates it; or Mingyun did not try to write this article, and Zizhan later saw Jiefu's chaos and drafted it, so it was attributed to Mingyunye. [1]
It can be proved that during the Wanli period of the Ming Dynasty at the latest, some people questioned the authenticity of the author because of the illogic of the "Theory of Distinguishing Treachery", that is, Su Shi wrote this article when he saw Wang Anshi's "chaotic government", and named it to his father Su Xun. After that, the early Qing scholar Li Fu wrote "After the Book Distinguishes Adultery"[2] and clearly stated that the article "Treatise on Distinguishing Adultery" was a forgery of Shao Bowen's name Su Xun during the two Song Dynasty. Later, Cai Shangxiang played it in "Wang Jinggong's Annals Strategy", according to Li. [3] Li and Cai's analysis is not unreasonable, and later generations have debated the authenticity of the "Theory of Distinguishing Treachery", which has many in-depth and detailed points, but most of its offensive and defensive ends are carried out from the doubts of Li and Cai. In particular, in the last two decades of the twentieth century, scholars such as Zhang Peiheng, Deng Guangming, and Wang Shuizhao [4] successively published treatises on the authenticity of the author of the "Theory of Distinguishing Adultery", which laid a solid foundation for the subsequent research on the identification and analysis of related issues, but it is still difficult to reach a conclusion, and there are still many difficult and difficult points to answer. Because of the inclusion of "The Theory of Distinguishing Adultery" in the literature of the Song Dynasty, in addition to Su Xun's anthology, there are also Zhang Fangping's "Mr. Wen'an's Tomb Table", Shao Bowen's "Shaw Brothers' Wenjianlu" volume 12, etc. At that time and later, the people of the Shen, Zhe, and Hui dynasties, except for Su Shi's article "Xie Zhang Taibao Wrote the Book of the Tombs of the Ancestors", did not mention the "Theory of Distinguishing Adultery". Until the time of the Two Song Dynasties, there were wild history notes such as Fang Scoop's "Bo Zhai Compilation", Ye Mengde's "Summer Retreat Record", Zhu Ben's "Qu Wei Old News", etc., and most of their Chinese characters were to explore Su Xun's motive for writing "The Theory of Adultery" and the origin of the disagreement between Wang and Su. Therefore, most of the later discussions on the authenticity of the author of the "Theory of Distinguishing Adultery" revolved around the above-mentioned documents.
The analysis of the authenticity of the author of the "Theory of Distinguishing Adultery" involves many aspects such as the official system, the ritual system and the style of literati communication and travel in the Song Dynasty, and is closely related to the compilation of various literary styles, documents and the circulation of their versions, so it is necessary to conduct a detailed and detailed examination and analysis of relevant historical materials and texts. Therefore, this article is based on historical materials on the issue of the authenticity of the author of the "Theory of Distinguishing Adultery" and the analysis and analysis of later generations, etc., in order to reveal the research on the relevant issues so far, which has been identified as true, which is false, and which is still in doubt, which needs to be deeply analyzed, and then put forward personal opinions on the authenticity of the "Theory of Distinguishing Adultery" and the author of the author.
2. The 20-volume edition of Su Xun's collected works does not contain "On Distinguishing Adultery"
The article "On Distinguishing Adultery" is included in the collection of Su Xun's essays in this biography. According to the records, there are three main editions of Su Xun's collection of essays in the Song Dynasty: 20 volumes, 15 volumes and 16 volumes.
Su Xun's poetry collection, according to Ouyang Xiu's "Epitaph of Su Jun in the Main Book of Wen'an County, Ancient Bazhou", [5] Zeng Gong's "Su Mingyun's Lamentation" [6] and Song's "National History: The Biography of Lao Su Ben", [7] "Eastern Capital Affairs" Volume 114, [8] "History of the Song Dynasty" Volume 443 Biography [9] all claim that it has 20 volumes of "Anthology". Chao Gongwu's "Junzhai Reading Journal" volume 19 [10], Chen Zhensun's "Zhizhai Shulu Problem Solving" volume 17 [11] recorded Su Xun's "Jiayou Collection" 15 volumes. "History of the Song Dynasty, Art and Literature, Other Collections" recorded 15 volumes of "Su Xun Collection" and 5 volumes of "Other Collections". [12] Zheng Qiao's "Tongzhi Art and Literature" recorded five volumes of Su Xun's "Lao Su Ji" and thirty volumes of "Jiayou Ji". [13] Today, the Shanghai Library has 15 volumes of the Song periodical Jiayou Collection, and Ren Guangliang's Explanation of Photocopying the Song Book Jiayou Collection believes that this Song book "should be regarded as a fine product of Shu carved towel box book". At the end of the fourth volume, there is Qiao Song's year, and this cloud book is "undoubtedly engraved in the Northern Song Dynasty". [14] During the reign of Jiajing of the Ming Dynasty, Zhang Bo engraved the book according to the Song periodical, which was in fifteen volumes, with the title "Jiayou Collection"; This fifteen-volume edition does not include the article "On the Identification of Adultery". In addition, volume 153 of the "General Catalogue of the Four Libraries" records the sixteen volumes of the "Jiayou Collection" and the two volumes of the "Appendix", saying that in addition to the above-mentioned fifteen volumes and twenty volumes, the various editions of Su Xun's collected works in the Song Dynasty still have:
Xu Qian's biography is in the collection of Lou, and the title at the end of the volume is "Shaoxing 17th year April obscure day Wuzhou Prefecture learning carving", the paper and ink are quite fine; and there are also Kangxi Suzhou Shao Renhong published, also known as from the Song book correction. However, the two books and sixteen volumes are different from those recorded by the Song people. Xu's original name is "Jiayou New Collection", and Shao's name is "Mr. Lao Quan's Collection", which is also different from each other, and there is no reason for it. Or at that time, in addition to the two books, there were also two books of this one, and there were two books of today's secular deeds: one was the Zhu Mo book published by the early Ming Ling Meng, and it was thirteen volumes. One is the school book of Changqing published by Cai Shiying of the National Dynasty, which is fifteen volumes, and the Chao family and the Chen family are combined. However, compared with Xu Ben, Que has one volume of "Hong Fan Tu Theory"; one article is less quoted before "Historical Theory", and "Historical Theory" is regarded as "Historical Theory", and Que Qi's "Historical Theory" is one article, and Que "Treatise on Adultery" is one article, "Portrait of Zhang Xian" is one, "Sending Wu Hou Officials to Que Preface", "Xie Ouyang Shumiqi" is one, "Xie Xiangfu Qi" is one, and "Xiang Shi" is one. Zhu Yizun's "Jingyi Examination" contains a volume of Xun's "Hongfan Diagram Theory", which is annotated as "not seen", and it is doubtful to see Xun's collection, which is this book immediately. If there is a gap in the middle, I am afraid that it may not be the old of the old record. [15]
According to this, it can be known that in April of the 17th year of Shaoxing in the early Southern Song Dynasty, the 16-volume "Jiayou New Collection" engraved by the Wuzhou Prefecture School contained the "Theory of Distinguishing Adultery".
Regarding the differences between the volumes of Su Xun's anthology, Li Fu distinguishes and analyzes the clouds:
Gai Magui and the "General Examination of Literature" list 15 volumes of Su Mingyun's "Jiayou Collection", and the secular engraved is not called "Jiayou", the title of the book is different, and there are as many as 20 volumes, and engraved into the "Hong Fan", "Confession" and other single books, and add two volumes of appendix, which means that there must be other people's forgeries into it. Recently, the Ming Jiajing Ren Shen Nian Taiyuan Shou Zhang Bo engraved the collection of the prince of the Imperial History of the Southern Prince, and its title, volume and the same as the "Examination of the Scriptures", and the only one in the treatises that does not care about the "Theory of Distinguishing Adultery" is Yixin's forgery for the Shaw Family, which is indeed undoubted. [16]
The so-called Shaw Brothers here is Shao Bowen, a man of the Two Song Dynasty who Li Fu believed was a forgery of the article "Distinguishing Adultery".
In 1979, Zhou Benchun published an article entitled "<辨奸论>Not a Forgery" to question Li Fu's statement, although "the fifteen volumes of the old banknote "Jiayou Collection" in the collection of Sun's ancestral hall in the Nanjing Library do not have "The Theory of Distinguishing Adultery", but Su Xun's collection of essays has 20 volumes, and Li Fu only bases his argument on the 15-volume "Jiayou Collection" that is "not completely original", which is "inevitably reckless". [17] Later, Zhang Peiheng published "<辨奸论>Non-Shao Bowen Forgeries", and also believed that Su Xun had 20 volumes of anthologies "in the world", and "the fifteen-volume Jiayou Collection is not Su Xun's Anthology", and that the 16-volume Jiayou Xinji engraved during the Shaoxing period of the Southern Song Dynasty said that "as the name suggests, the Jiayou Xinji should come after the Jiayou Collection", but the Jiayou Xinji, which contains the texts "On Distinguishing Adultery" and "Hongfan Tu Theory", may have been compiled before the fifteen-volume edition." It is true that it is closer to the original appearance of Su Xun's anthology than the existing fifteen-volume edition, and the extant fifteen-volume edition is much more extinct than the original Su Xun anthology. However, they do not believe that the 16-volume edition of Su Xun's anthology contains "The Theory of Distinguishing Adultery" because it is relatively close to the original appearance of Su Xun's anthology, but because it is more than the 15-volume version of Su Xun's original collection, which has been extinct a lot, it is asserted that it is a forgery, which is obviously a theory of putting the cart before the horse." However, the reason for adding a "new" word to the title of the sixteen-volume book that is closer to Su Xun's original collection is "suspected to be due to the addition of two volumes of the Appendix". [18]
In response to Zhang's statement, Deng Guangming wrote "<辨奸论>The Re-Submission and Re-Judgment of the Question of Authenticity", pointing out that the "Jiayou New Collection" has two volumes of appendices, including Zhang Fangping's "Tomb Table of Mr. Wen'an" and Su Shi's "Xie Zhang Taibao Wrote the Book of the Tombs of the Ancestors", but did not include Ouyang Xiu's "Epitaph of Su Jun in the Main Book of Wen'an County, Bazhou" and Zeng Gong's "Su Mingyun's Lamentation", "It is obviously a false heart, so it is a mystery that hinders people's consciousness." [19] Pei Rucheng also pointed out that according to the common sense of the compilation of Su Xun's collected works, the fifteen-volume Jiayou Collection should be the first, and the sixteen-volume Jiayou Xinji last. [20]
Regarding the differences in the titles and volumes of the various editions of Su Xun's anthology in the Song Dynasty, Zeng Zaozhuang <辨奸论>believes in the article "Examination of Authenticity and Falsity" that "Su Xun's earliest collection is a twenty-volume version", and it is not called "Jiayou Collection", "The renaming of Su Xun's anthology as "Jiayou Collection" is suspected to be done by the Southern Song Dynasty, probably because Su Xun named it "Jiayou Collection" because Su Xun was famous for these articles during the Jiayou period", and "in addition to the fifteen-volume "Jiayou Collection", there are also sixteen volumes of "Jiayou New Collection" and "Mr. Lao Quan's Collection". Since it is not surprising that the texts included in the 20-volume "Anthology" are not included in the 15-volume "Jiayou Collection", the 15-volume version that is "missing as it is" and "may not be the old of Chao and Chen's writings" cannot be regarded as an "important argument basis" for "denying that the "Treatise on Distinguishing Treachery" was written by Su Xun. [21]
There are some doubts about the above statements, but what can be determined from the above is that the sixteen-volume "Jiayu Xinji" contains the article "On the Identification of Adultery", while the fifteen-volume "Jiayu Collection" does not. However, Ouyang Xiu, Zeng Gong and others called the 20-volume collection of Su Xun's essays did not contain the "Theory of Distinguishing Adultery", neither of Zhang nor Zeng clearly stated, but one of them called the 20-volume version "the original of Su Xun's anthology", and the other said that "Su Xun's earliest collection was a 20-volume version", thus implying that the 20-volume edition contained the "Theory of Distinguishing Adultery". Deng Guangming wrote a special article pointing out that according to the "Epitaph" and "Lamentation" written by Ouyang Xiu and Zeng Gong, the 20-volume edition had already "traveled to the world" at that time, so "if the article 'Identifying Adultery' was already included in it," why did Shao Bowen "specifically point out in the "Wenjianlu" that the full text 'The Tomb of Mr. Duzhang Wending Gongbiao is contained'? The most logical answer should be that there must be no 'Identification of Adultery' in the original 20-volume collection of Lao Su's writings. [22] Later, Deng Guangming stated this in "Revisiting the Theory of Distinguishing Adultery and Not Written by Su Xun", and further pointed out that if the 20-volume collection of Su Xun's writings had already included the "Treatise on Distinguishing Adultery", "why did it not provoke any reaction from anyone through the Renzong, Yingzong, Shenzong, and Zhezong dynasties"[23]
A thorough examination of the surviving documents in the early years of the Southern Song Dynasty that refer to the "Theory of Distinguishing Adultery" shows that most of the information is the same as Shao Bowen's statement, that is, it is said that the person on which it is based is from the "(Su Xun) Tomb Table" written by Zhang Fangping (Zi Andao). For example, Ye Mengde's "Summer Retreat" in the early Southern Song Dynasty rolled up to the clouds:
Ming Yun wrote a secret dedication to Andao in "Identifying Adultery". ...... "Identifying Adultery" has not been out for a long time, Yuanfengjian, Ziyou from Andao to Nanjing, please be Mingyun's tomb table, especially full of it. The Su family is also not in the stone, and it is passed down to the world when it is younger. [24]
Another example is Hu Zai's "Yuyin Cong Words" and "Distinguishing Adultery", also known as "Yuguan Zhang Andao's "Lao Su Tomb Table"" Yunyun. [25] Indeed, if the 20-volume collection of Su Xun's essays already contains the Treatise on Distinguishing Adultery, it is quite difficult to explain the above phenomenon, so it can be presumed that the 20-volume collection of Su Xun's Essays did not contain the article "On Distinguishing Adultery".
In the early 80s of the last century, Liu Shangrong wrote <类编老苏大全文集>the article "Preliminary Exploration", using the fragment of "The Complete Collection of Mr. Lao Su to Enlarge the Complete Works of Mr. Lao Su" to discuss the earliest source of the "Theory of Distinguishing Adultery", which provided new material for the analysis of the authenticity of the author of "The Theory of Distinguishing Adultery". [26] This book is now in the collection of the National Library (formerly Beijing Library), which is the old collection of Changshu Qu's Tieqin and Bronze Sword Building. "The Bibliography of the Song and Yuan Dynasties in the Collection of the Iron Qin and Bronze Sword Building" cloud "This book does not see the bibliography of all families, nor is it disorderly, and the original volume is not examined", and now there are four remaining volumes, "'Yin', 'Zheng', 'Kuang' lack of pen, and the word 'Huan' is not changed to 'Wei', nor is there a lack of pen, it is suspected that it is the Northern Song Dynasty Masha Benye." [27] Later, Wang Shuizhao's "<辨奸论>Dispute over Authenticity" also pointed out that the third volume of the Song carving of the only book in the Beijing Library (now the National Library) of the Song Dynasty "The Complete Text Collection of Mr. Lao Su in the Category Compilation and Expansion of Mr. Su Zong" included the full text of the "Theory of Distinguishing Adultery", so the word "Huan" was not shy about it, so it should be designated as the Masha publication before Song Qinzong. [28] In response to this, Deng Guangming wrote an article in response that, according to his opinion from Shen Naiwen of the Peking University Library, the layout and font characteristics of Yun Masha's "Category Compilation and Enlargement of Mr. Huang's Large Complete Works" are the same as those of Huang Tingjian's collection of "Class Compilation and Expansion of Mr. Huang's Large Complete Works" in the Peking University Library. Liu Zhongji's house in Shuinan, Masha Town, has recently sought to increase the full text of Mr. Huang in 50 volumes, which is one-third more than the first printing. The main road Dragon Boat Festival is hidden. Therefore, "comparing the two books, it is obvious that they are both out of Liu Zhongji's house in Masha Town", and it is inferred that the time of the engraving of the two books is "not far apart, so that it is more reasonable to set it during the reign of Song Xiaozong". [29] As to whether the Masha version of the "Complete Text Collection of Mr. Lao Su of the Class Compilation and Enlargement of Mr. Su" is an engraved copy of the Northern Song Dynasty, Wang Shuizhao wrote another article in response, and after researching the relevant materials and the "Complete Text Collection of Mr. Huang of the Class Compilation and Enlargement of Mr. Huang" in the collection of the Peking University Library, he also admitted that there are "doubts" that it was determined to be an engraved copy of the Northern Song Dynasty. [30]
According to the Song engraving of Su Xun's anthology, in addition to the fifteen-volume "Jiayou Collection" in the Shanghai Library, and the "Large Complete Text Collection of Mr. Lao Su in the National Library", there are also excerpts from Shao Xijian, Wu Yanke, Lu Zuqian, and Lang Ye's annotation of the 12-volume edition of "The Collected Works of Mr. Lao Quan". According to the above, the 15 volumes of Su Xun's Collection and the five volumes of Bei Ji are mentioned above in the History of the Song Dynasty and Art and Literature Chronicles, and it is not clear whether the aforementioned 20-volume Su Xun Anthology is the same as that of Su Xun, and Zheng Qiao's Tongzhi Yiwenluo records five volumes of Su Xun's Lao Su Ji and 30 volumes of Jiayou Ji, and this five-volume Lao Su Ji may refer to the five volumes of the Bei Ji. In addition, Wang Yinglin's "Chronicles of Sleepy Learning" Volume 17 "Commentary" said that ""The Twelve Equal Pictures of Great Music", written by Yang Cigong, was also compiled in "Lao Su Ji". [31] However, this "Twelve Equals of Great Happiness" is not recorded in the present biography of "Jiayou Collection", and according to Yang Jie's (Zi Cigong) "Wuwei Collection" volume 15 "Shangyan Seven Things of Great Happiness",[32] it is known that Yang Jie wrote "Twelve Equal Pictures of Great Music" in the second year of Yuanfeng, so it is inferred that the "Lao Su Ji" mentioned by Wang Yinglin should not be the twenty-volume version called by Ouyang Xiu, Zeng Gong and others, but should have been compiled by the Southern Song Dynasty, and was mistakenly included in Yang Jie's article.
or the anthology of famous writers of the Yun and Song dynasties, there are often many versions, some of which were compiled by the author during his lifetime, such as compiling a "small collection" of poems and essays for a certain period. However, according to the current literature, there is no similar phenomenon in the compilation of Su Xun's anthology. Since the Jiayou Xinji, which was printed in the Shaoxing period of the early Southern Song Dynasty, already contains the article "On the Identification of Treachery", it is necessary to discuss the editions compiled and published before this, and it is doubtful whether the Complete Works of Mr. Lao Su was published in the Northern Song Dynasty, because Ma Shaben has always been not strict about avoiding secrets. As for the 20-volume and 15-volume editions of Su Xun's collected works, according to the above examination, it can be generally confirmed that they were compiled and engraved in the Northern Song Dynasty, but neither of these two editions contains the "Treatise on Distinguishing Adultery".
3. The compilation of Zhang Fangping's "Complete Works of Music".
Zhang Fangping's "Tomb Table of Mr. Wen'an" written for Su Xun is included in Volume 39 of "The Complete Works of Music", and the full text of "Distinguishing Adultery" is included in "Tomb Table". [33] Because the deeds of Wang Anshi mentioned in the "Tomb Table" are quite inconsistent with historical facts, and the titles in it are also different from the customs of the Song people, Li Fu "suspected that the "Tomb Table" and "Identification of Adultery" were both made by the Shaw Brothers after the fact. [34] In addition to Li Fu's doubts, Cai Shangxiang also pointed out that Zhang Fangping was praised by the people of the time as "a genius in the world, and Zizhan prefaced his anthology, which is also known as the poetry and prose Qingyuan and majestic, and readers can imagine him." The most strange thing is that it is not as mixed with the words of fate, Ming Yun died in the third year of Zhiping, and in the third year of Xining, An Shi Shi was the same as the Ping Zhang, and it was the same dynasty as Andao, and An had to make a mistake so far? [35]
In 1957, Li Qingyi published "The <辨奸论>Question of the Authenticity of the Trial Theory", pointing out that Zhang Fangping's "Tomb Table" was "written shortly after Su Xun's death, when Shao Bowen was still in his childhood", and it was impossible to write "The Theory of Distinguishing Adultery", and Zhang Fangping specially included the article "On Distinguishing Adultery" in "Tomb Table". [36] Subsequently, Zhou Benchun, who also attached great importance to the key role of Zhang Fangping's Le Quanji in the argument for the authenticity of the Theory of Distinguishing Adultery, also wrote an article pointing out that "the two books of Le Quanji and Jingjin Dongpo Wenji Shilu were by no means forged by Yuan You and his Taoist followers, and neither of them was mentioned by Li", so he concluded that the author of the Treatise on Distinguishing Adultery should belong to Su Xun and was not forged by Shao Bowen. [37] Zhang Peiheng also believed that "this original book was copied from the old version of Song Xiaozong's time" according to the "Synopsis" of the "Complete Works of Music" in the "Siku Quanshu", and there was no doubt about the number of volumes; However, there is no Su Shi's "Preface" at the beginning of this volume, and it should be "Fang Ping thinks that this "Preface" does not dare to return to Su Shi, then it should not have Su Shi's "Preface" in its concentration. Therefore, the "Preface" of Song Xiaozong's old book is actually a proof that this book is faithful to the original and does not add arbitrarily." [38] In addition, with regard to Zhou Wen, Liu Naichang pointed out in "The Interaction between Su Shi and Wang Anshi" that according to the photocopy of "The Complete Collection of Le Quanshu" in the "First Collection of Rare Books of the Four Libraries", the four characters "Jinshang Yuming" were annotated under the word "Shen", which proves that it was engraved in the period of Song Xiaozong, so there is still a possibility of incurring a forgery. [39]
Zhang Fangping's Anthology, according to Wang Gong's "Lines" in the appendix of "The Complete Works of Music", Zhang Fangping has "forty volumes of texts, called "The Complete Works of Music", twenty volumes of internal and external dictionaries, miscellaneous works, and "Yutang Collection"; [40] Su Shi's "Epitaph on the Cemetery of Zhang Wending" and "The Biography of Zhang Fangping in the Eastern Capital" both claim that there are 40 volumes of "The Complete Works of Music" and 20 volumes of "Yutang Collection". [41] Zhao Xiben's "Reading Notes" recorded Zhang Fangping's "Yutang Collection" in 20 volumes, Yun Qi "went in and out of the two prohibitions for 20 years, and there were many canons for a while." Liu Zhongsu tasted the preface to the twenty volumes of his "Yutang Collection", which was in addition to the forty volumes of the "Complete Collection of Music" prefaced by Dongpo, and was re-engraved in Caotai, Jiangxi Province in the ninth year of Chunxi. [42] "Zhizhai Shulu Problem Solving", volume 17, "Mr. Le Quan's Collection" 40 volumes, "Yutang Collection" 20 volumes. [43] "History of the Song Dynasty, Art and Literature, Other Collections" recorded Zhang Fangping's "Yutang Collection" 20 volumes, "Zhang Fangping Collection" 40 volumes, and "Jince" 9 volumes. [44]
For the compilation of "The Complete Works of Music" and "Yutang Collection", according to Zhang Fangping's "Preface to the Complete Works of Xie Su Zizhan Jile", written by Ziyun Qi's poems:
All the scriptures, or the will, or the application, every draft, put it into the box, and did not try to read it again. If you read it again, you will not be satisfied, and you will despise it. Therefore, there are two piles, and there has been no change. In Xining, he had to stay in Nanjing, and there was nothing to do, and there was a good official who was quite sensitive, and he also knew a little about the style of the article. According to the article, each of them is a class, and he has never read it himself. There are three scribes, transcribed into volumes, during which errors are omitted, and none of them have proofread and changed the certificate. The year before last, the son looked at the request and was clumsy and gladly accepted, so he complained in order to delete its redundancy, despise its filth, save three or four, and talk about paying for the descendants. [45]
Regarding Su Shi's compilation of Zhang Fangping's anthology, Su Shi has "Mr. Le Quan's Collected Narratives", which states that Zhang Fangping "has been in Yuanfeng for more than 40 years since Qingli, and he has discussed the affairs of the world with others. Youyun:
Shi is 20 years old, to see the public Chengdu, the public to see, to treat the country, now more than 30 years, so the development of the achievements of the people. And Shi finally has no effect on the size of the public, only seek its anthology, hand school and family collection, and talk about its roughness, in order to wait for the gentleman of future generations. ...... In the eighty-first year of the year, Du Men swept away, sat in danger all day long, and would swim with the Creator in the land of nothing, and could not be heard, and his writings were several volumes and poems. [46]
Again, Zhang Fangping's "Xie Liu Xin Lao Ji Yutang Collection Preface" cloud:
In the middle of Yingzong's reign, he re-summoned the bachelor to accept the order, resigned, and returned to the internal ban, and lived in the East Pavilion of Yutang. Since he is lonely, he has entered the house of Chengming, and he has read two forbidden words in his spare time, because he has written the history of the two courts before and after the internal and external decrees and forbidden words, and the class is 20 volumes. ...... The jade hall, Emperor Taizong's magic pen flying white book "Yutang signature" four words, unveiled in the middle of the Ying, prepared in the old chronicles of Hanlin, so to the fate of the cloud. [47]
To sum up, it can be seen that, first, Zhang Fangping's essays are collected in addition to the forty volumes of "The Complete Works of Music", and there are still twenty volumes of "Yutang Collection".
Second, according to Zhang Fangping's "Preface to Xie Liu Xin's Old Yutang Collection", his "Yutang Collection" was compiled during the reign of Emperor Yingzong of the Song Dynasty. Liu Yu (the word Xin Lao, Zhen Zhongsu) wrote the "Preface to the Collection of Yutang", which has "Since the Qingli as for Xining, Wei Renzu is frugal and lenient, Yingzu is a martyr, the lord is long and far away, slightly unborn, the political achievements of the three dynasties, and the majestic Huanhuan" Yunyun,[48] the preface was written in the Xining period of Shenzong. The "Complete Works of Music" was first compiled in Xiningzhong, when Zhang Fangping knew that Tianfu and Nanjing should stay behind, and ordered a clerk to "compile" the old texts that had accumulated them, "according to the title, each into a class", and ordered "three scribes to copy into a volume"; and then compiled it into the hands of Su Shi. According to the "Epitaph of Zhang Wending Cemetery", Zhang Fangping died in December of the sixth year of Yuan You at the age of eighty-five,[49] so it is inferred that Su Shi compiled the collection of essays for him in the middle of the second year of Yuan You.
Third, what the "Yutang Collection" collects is "the internal and external orders and the forbidden words before and after", that is, the "two forbidden words". Liu Yi's "Preface to the Collection of the Jade Hall" also means that the three dynasties of Yunrenzong, Yingzong, and Shenzong "have a book of orders, more public hands, the benevolence and virtue of the above, and the prestige and blessing of the country. [50] Therefore, Zhao Xiben's "Reading Notes" says that "Liu Zhongsu tastes the twenty volumes of his "Yutang Collection", which is outside the forty volumes of Dongpo's "Music Collection". Wang Gong's "Xing Zhuang" also said that Zhang Fangping had "forty volumes of literature, called "The Complete Works of Music", twenty volumes of internal and external dictionaries, miscellaneous works, and "Yutang Collection". It can be inferred from this that the 40 volumes of Wang Gong's "Xingzhi", Su Shi's "Epitaph of Zhang Wending Cemetery" and Su Shi's preface to "The Complete Works of Music" do not include the "two forbidden words" contained in the 20 volumes of the "Yutang Collection".
Today, the 40 volumes of the "Complete Works of Music", and the 153 clouds of the "Siku Quanshu General Catalogue" are rarely circulated. This book is quite perfect, the word "Shen" is annotated with the words "the name of the emperor today", and the cover is from the time of filial piety, but it does not contain the original preface of Su Shi, and the writer is suspected of leaving it behind." Youyun:
Fang Ping's words in the Hanlin era, such as the establishment of the crown prince, the envoy of the Jie Du of the Seed, Han Qi Shou Situ, the privy envoy of Lu Gongbi, and the former deputy commander of Li Zhaoliang's palace, are all in this collection. Kao Wang Gong made "Square Parallel", saying that there are 20 volumes of "Yutang Collection", and the same is contained in "Eastern Capital Affairs", and the reform of the grass is not a series, so it is not contained in the collection. [51]
According to this, it is known that when Zhang Fangping was in charge of the two systems, he wrote the "canonical order", "worship and praise, ancestral hall praise and praise ring", etc., all of which were included in the "Yutang Collection", such as the "Summary" in front of the book "The Complete Works of Music" in Sikuben. However, the three and five "Sacrifice Texts" contained in the third and fifth volumes of the "Complete Works of Music" contained in the eighth year of Qingli's "Sacrifice to the Late Xia Kingdom", the fifth year of Qingli's "Therefore Entering the Inner Deputy Capital Gave Zhenwu Army Festival Degree Envoy Sacrifice Text", "Therefore Entering the Inner Deputy Capital Gave Zhenwu Army Festival Degree Envoy Sacrifice Text", "Therefore Entering the Inner Deputy Capital Knew to Present Zhenwu Army Festival Degree Envoy Hall Sacrifice Text", all of which were written by Zhang Fangping when he was a scholar of Hanlin "on behalf of the Son of Heaven"; and the third volume of "Sacrifice Tenglong Picture and Text" was written in November of the fifth year of Yuan You, and later when Su Shi compiled "The Complete Works of Music". Therefore, it is inferred that this "Filial Piety Periodical Edition" is no longer the "old version" of Zhang Fangping's anthology compiled by Su Shi, but rather a collection that was added later.
Written in the early Southern Song Dynasty, Shao Bowen's "Records of the Shaw Family's Wenjianlu", Wang Cheng's "Eastern Capital Affairs" volume 114 "Su Xun's Biography", and Zhu Xi's "Words and Deeds of Famous Ministers of the Five Dynasties" volume 10-5 "Mr. Su " all cited the article "On Distinguishing Treachery". [52] According to the examination of the "Tongzhi, Art and Literature, and Other Collections", the poetry and essays of the more famous poets and scribes in the late Northern Song Dynasty, such as Wang Anshi, Lu Huiqing, Zhang Shangying, Su Shi Brothers, and the four disciples of Sumen who were later than Zhang Fangping, all have records, but they do not contain Zhang Fangping's anthologies, so it is inferred that Zhang Fangping's anthologies in the late Northern Song Dynasty were not widely circulated, and they were not spread among scholars and doctors until the two Song Dynasty. Su is not in the stone, and it is passed down to the world younger than his youth"[53], that is, the "Tomb Table of Mr. Wen'an", which contains the "Theory of Distinguishing Adultery", because Zhang Fangping's anthology gradually circulated in the world during the Two Song Dynasty, so it was known to Shao Bowen and Ye Mengde, and they were cited one after another.
Fourth, the relationship between the "Dongpo Hand" edition of "Dongpo Collection", the Northern Song Dynasty Hangzhou edition and the Southern Song Dynasty Xiaozong edition
Su Shi's "Xie Zhang Taibao Wrote the Book of the Tombs of the Ancestors" is included in the "Dongpo Collection" volume 29, with "Fu Meng shows the ancestors again "Tomb Table", and specially contains an article "Distinguishing Adultery", Yunyun also said:
And the words of the ancestors, if they are not public, people may not believe them. Believe it or not, what a deep plan, but let the Si people use a small decimal to deceive the world, the world does not know, I am afraid that there will be a sigh of Qin no one in the future. The reason why this "Tomb Table" was made, and the reason why Shi was sobbing and thanking him again. [54]
Among them, the so-called "special article "Distinguishing Adultery" refers to Zhang Fangping's special full text of "Distinguishing Adultery" in "Mr. Wen'an's Tomb Table". In this regard, Li Fu believes that Su Shi's "Book of Thanks", Su Xun's "Theory of Distinguishing Adultery", and Zhang Fangping's "Mr. Wen'an's Tomb Table" are all forgeries of Shao Bowen. [55] Cai Shangxiang agreed with Li Fuzhi's statement, pointing out that Ouyang Xiu wrote "Epitaph" for Su Xun and Zeng Gongwei wrote "Lamentation", neither of which mentioned "Distinguishing Adultery", nor did they mention it in other essays in Ou and Zeng's anthologies, so Zhang Fangping's "Tomb Table" and Su Shi's "Book of Thanks" were "specially made for "Distinguishing Adultery", and "the original forger's intention is that if there is no Andao "Tomb Table", it is not enough to realize the fruit of "Discernment", and if it is not Zizhan's "Book of Thanks", it is not enough to realize the fruit of Andao , and I don't know that the words of one person who made a forgery, and the pen of a while", and according to the phrase "younger than the age passed down to the world", it is inferred that "the theory of distinguishing adultery" and "the tomb table of Mr. Wen'an" "must be forged after Yuan You". [56]
Regarding Li and Cai Zhi's statement, Zhang Peiheng questioned it, thinking: (1) Chen Zhensun's "Zhizhai Shulu Problem Solving" volume 17 recorded 40 volumes of "Dongpo Collection", 20 volumes of "Later Collection", 10 volumes of "Internal Collection", 3 volumes of "External Collection", 15 volumes of "Concerto", 4 volumes of "He Tao Collection", and 10 volumes of "Ying Zhao Ji", cloud: "Hangzhou and Shu are the same, but Hangzhou does not have "Ying Zhao Ji". He also recorded the forty-six volumes of the "Dongpo Collection", cloud:
Po's great-grandson gave the matter of Ji Zhenkan's family in Jian'an, roughly the same as Hang Ben. Gai Hangben, when Po Gong was unharmed, he was already in the world. There is also a "Complete Collection" in Masha Bookstore, which also contains "Zhilin", miscellaneous sayings, etc., and is also mixed with the texts of Yingbin and Xiaopo, and there are sometimes false intruders. There is Zhang for Jizhou, take Jian'an to publish all the legacy, without examination, in the edict, policy discussion. Gai Jian'an also does not have a "Collection of Edicts". [57]
Therefore, it is known that there are "forgeries" in Mashaben's "Great Collection", but Hangben, who "was already in the world when Po Gong was unharmed", "could not have been forged". (2) Su Zhe's "(Su Shi) Epitaph" said that Su Shi "has 40 volumes of "Dongpo Collection", 20 volumes of "Later Collection", 15 volumes of "Recital", 10 volumes of "Internal System", 3 volumes of "External System", and the public poems are like Li and Du, and Tao Yuanming is happy in the evening, and those who chase after him several times, Fan 4 volumes". Because of the "list of collection names, the number of volumes, and the same as Hangben." It can also prove that Hangben's compilation is actually from Su's intention. "Dongpo Collection" is also compiled by Shi himself, so there must be no forgery in it." (3) "The Song Dynasty Hangben Su Shi Collection is not available today", but the first six episodes of the existing Ming Chenghua journal "Dongpo Seven Episodes" are from the Song Dynasty Cao Xun Edition, comparing Cao Ben and the Su Shi Collection recorded in the "Zhizhai Shulu Solution", it can be seen that it is not the Masha book "Daquan Collection", nor Hangben, Jian'an Ben, nor Jizhou Ben, except for the lack of the four volumes of "He Tao Collection", its collection name and volume are the same as the Yunshu book of "Zhizhai Shulu Solution", and it can be known that Cao Ben "immediately re-engraved according to Shu Ben". And the "Zhizhai Shulu Solution" has a cloud "Hangzhou and Shu are the same, but Hangzhou does not have "Ying Zhao Ji", then "Shu Ben except for many "Ying Zhao Ji", the other six episodes (including "Dongpo Ji") are the same as Hang Ben". Because Su Shi's "Xie Zhang Taibao Wrote the Book of the Tombs of the Ancestors" "is collected in the 29th volume of Cao Xun's "Dongpo Collection" engraved according to the Shu book, and it should be from the Shu book", so Su Shi's "Xie Shu" "must also be included in the Hangben "Dongpo Collection" volume 29", because "it is impossible for the Hangben "Dongpo Collection" to be forged, so this article cannot be a forgery. And in response to or Yun's question that "although Cao Xunben is from Shuben, he knows that he has not added works that are not available in Shu without authorization", he pointed out: "At that time, the largest number of poems and essays collected were "Daquan" and "Beicheng", if Cao Xunben wanted to win with more, why not re-engrave according to the two books? If he did not want to win with more, why did he add works that did not exist in Shu without authorization?" He also pointed out that "those who were engaged in the identification of Su Shi's works by the Song people cited many forgeries, such as the later collection of "Tiaoxi Yuyin Cong Words" mentioned "Old Man Xing", etc., "Rong Zhai Wubi" mentioned "Dengzhou Shangdian Sanza", " None of the works written by Su Shi and were very famous at that time, but they were not included in Cao Xunben, such as the poems of the Imperial History Mansion, which were not collected when he compiled the "Dongpo Collection" for Shi, such as the poems of the Imperial History Mansion, are not found in Cao Xunben. It shows that Cao Xunben is indeed very faithful to his original text, not only has there been no forgeries, but also no genuine or famous works that have not been included in the original collection." [58]
Regarding Zhang Wen's description of the attack on the various versions of Su Shi's "Dongpo Collection", Deng Guangming questioned it, saying that "the first six episodes of the Yunming Chenghua version of "Dongpo Seven Episodes" by Zhang Wen were based on the old version engraved by Cao Xun in the Song Dynasty, and there was no increase or subtraction in Cao Xun's book, and Cao Xun's book "was immediately re-engraved according to the Shu book" and "there was no increase or subtraction", and his "Shu book is the same as the Hangzhou book, which is found in the Chenghua engraving "Dongpo Anthology" volume 29 of the "Xie Zhang Taibao Writing the Cemetery Table Book", which must be Hangben's "Dongpo Anthology" The 29th volume is included, and Hangben was already alive when Dongpo was unharmed, then this "Book of Thanks" must be the genuine work of Dongpo", pointing out that Zhang's inferences are not substantiated, "all of which cannot but make the reader doubt", because "to make the assertion that 'there is no increase or loss' just because the title and the number of volumes are the same" is "extremely crude and difficult to believe." Think about it, if you only put in a letter of "Xie Shu", how can you change the title and number of volumes?" and infer that "if Lao Su's "Tomb Table" in "The Complete Works of Music" is a forgery of a certain vain person after Zhang Fangping's death, then Dongpo's "Book of Thanks" must also be the work of a vain person, and it appeared at the end of the Northern Song Dynasty, so how can it be seen in the Hangben and Shuben Poji of 'Po Gong was already in the world when Po Gong was unharmed'?" [59]
Deng Wenzhi's doubts are indeed quite strong, but because the people he discerned are mainly based on inferences, no new evidence has been presented. In response to the discussion of Zhang and Deng Erwen's involvement in the various versions of the "Dongpo Collection", Wang Shuizhao wrote <辨奸论>an article entitled "The Dispute of Authenticity", pointing out that the Beijing Library, the Japanese Cabinet Library, and the Imperial Household Agency have three fragments of the Song carving of the only copy of the "Dongpo Collection", which are avoided to the word "Shen", when engraved in the Song Xiaozong, from the name of the engraver and the area where he is located, "the inner library is really within the scope of the Hangzhou version, and the palace and the Beitu are the same version, or the official version of the Jiangxi region, or the Jian'an version, which is still inconclusive." However, from the point of view of the style of compilation and engraving, it belongs to the same version system as Hangben", and the Song people tried to say that "Hangben was in the world when the Po Gong was unharmed", "the Shichuan "Qianji" (i.e., the "Dongpo Collection") is the Dongpo hand editor, with its source, the ancient law poems are intertwined, and there are few errors, such as the poems of the "Imperial History Mansion", which do not want to be passed on to the world, and "The Old Man's Line" and "The Inscription of King Shen Painting Horses" are not made by him, so they are all gone", and "this book is indeed the case today", so "no one can point out that any of them are forged in", "" The rarest book". Therefore, "if there is no conclusive evidence, it cannot be concluded that Su Shi's "Book of Thanks" is fake", so I agree with Zhang Peiheng's statement, and then determine that "On Distinguishing Adultery" and Zhang Fangping's "Tomb Table" should not be forgery. [60] Deng Guangming wrote another article in response, pointing out that even if this unique Southern Song Dynasty copy of the Dongpo Collection did belong to the Hangben system, it "cannot be equated with the Hangben Dongpo Collection, which had already been published in the Northern Song Dynasty, and believed that the Southern Song Dynasty inscription of the Dongpo Collection, Volume 29, contained the Xie Zhang Taibao Book, and asserted that the Northern Song Dynasty Hangzhou engraving Dongpo Collection compiled by Dongpo himself must have been included in it." Deng Wen also cited the example of Sima Guang's "Heirloom Collection" to illustrate: Sima Guang tried to compile the "Heirloom Collection" by himself, "most of the articles collected in it are written in the title, and it is indeed a detailed and easy-to-use book", in the early years of the Southern Song Dynasty, it was engraved and printed by his descendant Sun Zhiquan Sima Ling, but it was soon corrected by Hong Mai's "Rong Zhai Five Strokes", pointing out that Sima Guang had dismissed the Imperial History Zhongcheng in the fourth year of Zhiping, and how could he impeach Wang Anshi in the third year of Xining with the title of Imperial History Zhongcheng? The inclusion of Sima Guang's "Bullet King Anshi Chapter" is a forgery by later generations, and Sima Ling "was mistaken by vain people and could not detect it". Therefore, "according to this same reasoning, how can it be asserted that Dongpo compiled the book by Dongpo himself, and that it must have been included in the Dongpo Collection, which was already published in Hangzhou when he was unharmed, that Wang Shuizhao wrote another article in response, arguing that even if Sima Ling engraved Sima Guang's "Heirloom Collection" with a forgery, "it does not necessarily prove that there must have been a forgery in this reprint of the Southern Song Dynasty's Dongpo Collection"; The Southern Song Dynasty version and the Northern Song Dynasty Su Shi's self-compiled version (Hangben) are simply equated, but they only positively argue that this Southern Song Dynasty version preserves the original appearance of the 'Hangben'"; and then, according to the Song Dynasty Hu Zai's Tiaoxi Yuyin Cong Words, Volume 28, and Fu Zengxiang's Zangyuan Qunshu Jing Yanlu, Volume 13, etc., which refer to the text of this Southern Song Dynasty inscription "Dongpo Collection", reaffirms the "authoritative version status" of this book, and emphasizes that "without conclusive evidence, it cannot be concluded that Su Shi's "Book of Thanks" is false. [62]
Zhang Peiheng, Deng Guangming, and Wang Shuizhao analyzed and argued the relationship between Su Shi's self-compiled version of the "Dongpo Collection", the Hangzhou edition of the Northern Song Dynasty, and the time book of Xiaozong of the Southern Song Dynasty. However, there are still many doubts in the above discussion that are not easy to explain: for example, as far as the person who holds Su Shi's "Book of Thanks" is a forgery, his explanation of the relationship between the handed down "Dongpo Collection" and Su Shi's hand-set collection and Hangben is not without merit, but in the end it is mostly inferential and difficult to convince people. As far as those who hold that Su Shi's "Book of Thanks" is not false, their argument on the relationship between the editions of Su Shi's collected works also has the inadequacy of the assertion that "there is no increase or loss" between the Southern Song Dynasty Xiaozong's version and Su Shi's self-compiled version, as Deng Guangming criticized. At the same time, the above argument does not seem to have fully taken into account the political situation of Su Shi in the late Northern Song Dynasty.
(1) When was "Xie Zhang Taibao Writing the Book of Tombs of the Ancestors" written? Deng Guangming mainly relied on Su Shi's "Book of Xie" to call Zhang Fangping the Taibao, and according to the "History of the Song Dynasty: The Biography of Zhang Fangping", "Zhezong Li, plus the prince Taibao", it is presumed that Zhang Fangping's "Tomb Table" was written in "the late Yuanfeng or Yuan You". However, Wang Shuizhao believes that this article should have been written in the first year of Yuanfeng to the third year, because "at the beginning of Yuanfeng, Zhang Fangping had already taken the Taiwei when he was left behind in Nanjing, and in the second year of Yuanfeng, Zhang's Zhishi had already 'inspected the Taibao', see Wang Gong's "Xingzhi": "With the Xuanhui Southern Yuan Envoy, the Xuanhui Southern Yuan Envoy, the Taifu Taifu, and the Prince Young Fu Zhishi, and sent the envoys to the first gift"; Volume 28) and so on, so it is not impossible for Yuanfeng to call Zhang Fangping 'Taibao'." [63]
According to Wang Wen, "it is not necessary for Yuan Feng to call Zhang Fangping 'Taibao' at the beginning" does not seem to be valid. Because, first, Su Shi's "Epitaph on the Tomb of Zhang Wending" Yun Qixining "thought that the Xuanhui Southern Court envoy and the inspector Taifu should be sentenced to Tianfu", and at the beginning of Yuanfeng, "worship the prince and young master, and use Xuanhui to make a scholar." The official system is carried out, the Xuanhui Yuan is dismissed, and the only public leader is the same. Now that he is on the throne, he will dismiss the minister and take the crown prince to the prince". [64] "Continuation of the Governance of Tongjian Long Edition" Volume 22 contains Jiaxu in July of the second year of Yuanfeng, "Xuanhui Southern Yuan Envoy, Inspection School Taifu, East Taiyi Palace Envoy Zhang Fangping is the prince and young master, Xuanhui Southern Yuan envoy Zhishi". [65] "History of the Song Dynasty: The Biography of Zhang Fangping" said that it "invites the old man, and the prince and young master are the masters." The official system is carried out, the Xuanhui envoy is abolished, and the only order is the same. Zhe Zongli, plus the prince Taibao". [66] In addition, Zhang Fangping signed the title of "Xuanhui Southern Yuan Envoy, Guanglu Doctor, Inspector Taifu, Prince Young Master Zhishi, Shangzhu Guo Zhang" on July 29 of the second year of Yuanfeng, and in the "Sacrifice to Zhao Shaoshi Wen" on April 16 of the sixth year of Yuanfeng, he signed the title "Xuanhui Southern Yuan Envoy, Inspector Taifu, Prince Young Master Zhishi, Shangzhu Guo Zhang". [67] Therefore, Yue Ke's "Baozhen Zhai Fa Shu Zan" volume 12 recorded "Su Wenzhong Jin Dan Ti", which was written by Su Shi "Huang Shi", and he called Zhang Fangping "Mr. Young Master Wenzhang Deacon",[68] but not "Taibao". and Fan Zuyu's "Giving the New Removal of Xuanhui Southern Yuan Envoy Inspection Taifu Yiformer Prince Taibao Zhishi Zhang Fangping Resignation Exemption from Grace and Not Allowing the Edict", which was written on July 24 in the sixth year of Yuan You. [69] It can be proved that Zhang Fangping was the envoy of the Xuanhui Southern Academy, the Taifu of the inspection school, and the envoy of the East Taiyi Palace as the young master of the prince and the envoy of the Xuanhui Southern Academy. Zhang Fangping's "Xing Zheng" written by Wang Gong Yun Qi "to Xuanhui Southern Yuan Envoy, Inspector Taibao, Taifu, Prince Shaoshi Zhishi",[70] According to the official system of the Song Dynasty, it is impossible to grant one person to inspect the school Taibao and the inspector Taifu at the same time, so it can be seen that the word "Taibao" is a derivative text.
Second, Wang Gong's "Xing Zheng" states that Zhang Fangping's officials "advised the doctors, and gave the matter to the courtesy, officials, household servants, Shangshu Zuocheng, Gong, Li, Criminal, and Hubu Shangshu, Xuanhui North and South Yuan, Xuanhui North and South Yuan, and inspected the school Taibao and Taifu, and took the prince and young master to give the Shi", which was his taste to confer the official inspection of the school Taibao, but according to the "Long Edition" volume 269, Zhang Fangping was sentenced to the Xuanhui Southern Court to be sentenced to Tianfu in October of the eighth year of Xining,[71] In October of the eighth year of Xining, when he was sentenced to Tianfu, he had already inspected the school Taifu, and the official quality was higher than that of the school Taibao, so it was balanced against the officialdom customs of the Song Dynasty, and in the early years of Yuanfeng, Su Shi honored Zhang Fangping as "Zhang Taifu", and should not be called "Zhang Taibao". Or think that this is according to the practice of the Song people, and call it "Zhang Taibao" after Zhang Fangping and Yuan You's final official prince Taibao. However, in Su Shi's collection, the title of the poem is called "Zhang Andao", such as the title of the poem is "The Second Rhyme Zhang Andao Reads Du Poems", "Send Zhang Andao to the Southern Capital to Stay in Taiwan", "Zhang Andao Le Quantang", "Zhang Andao Sees the Near Poem", "Mr. Le Quan's Birthday Two Songs", etc., the title of the article has "On Zhang Andao's Health Tips", and the "Zhang Taibao" is called "Zhang Taibao" in addition to "Xie Zhang Taibao wrote the tomb book of the ancestors", only the article "With Zhang Taibao", there is "a certain is not good at pitching, and it has been repeatedly caused, and I have heard it in detail." Those who are near are invited to the county, and Dumen is on standby for a few twenty days. Wen Mu Yingsheng, deep love and hypocrisy, German and sound, Chinese and foreign convincing. There are almost some dispatches, and the public is reconciled. There is a decree for a few days, and the number of people who speak are all urging service, and tomorrow they should see "Yunyun", which was written on the 26th day of the first month of the second year of Yuanyou. [72] Because Zhang Fangping had changed to the crown prince Taibao at this time, he could be called "Zhang Taibao". And if Su Shi called Zhang Fangping "Zhang Taibao" in the early years of Yuanfeng, it was quite inconsistent with the official and private customs of the Song Dynasty.
Wang Wen believes that another important reason why Su Shi's "Book of Xie" was written between the first year of Yuanfeng and the third year of Yuanfeng: "The Book of Xie was included in the 29th volume of the Dongpo Collection published by Song Xiaozong. This is the first rare book of the surviving Suji. The poems before and after this book are roughly chronological. Included in the twenty-ninth volume of the text, the "Shu Shu of Xie" and the "Shu of Xie" before the "Shu of Xie" were written during Su Shi's tenure in Xuzhou, and the "Book of Xie" after the "Book of Xie" and the "Book of Li Duan" were written when the official Huangzhou was demoted. Su Shi dismissed Xuzhou in March of the second year of Yuanfeng, and went to Huangzhou in February of the third year of Yuanfeng, so it can also be roughly speculated that the "Book of Thanks" should have been written at this stage (about the first year of Yuanfeng to the third year)". It is also said that the seventeenth volume of Kong Fanli's "Su Shi Annals" "is the article of this "Book of Thanks" in the first year of Yuanfeng". [73]
Indeed, the Song people also said that the poems and texts in the "Dongpo Qianji" were roughly arranged according to time. For example, at the end of volume 96 of "The Complete Works of Ouyang Xiu", there is a commentary from the Southern Song Dynasty: "Today, Su Wenzhong is used to compile the method of "Dongpo Qianji", and all the expressions are in the order of worship. [74] The Dongpo Collection, Volume 29, which was published during the examination of Song Xiaozong (with a preface written in the first month of the ninth year of Xiaozong's Qiandao, that is, the collection of the Japanese Cabinet Library as called by Wang Wen), contains ten articles, namely: "The Book of the Prime Minister of Shang Han on Disasters and Injuries", "The Book of Robbers and Rewards", "The Book of Salt in the Above Servants", "The Book of Answering Shuhuan", "The Book of Answering Huang Luzhi", "The Book of Answering Song Temple", "The Book of Huangzhou Shangwen Lugong", "The Book of the Tomb of the Ancestors of Xie Zhang Taibao", "The Book of Thick Books with Zhangzi" and "The Book of Answering Uncle Li Duan".
Han Jiang's "The Book of the Prime Minister of Shang Han on Disasters and Injuries" is written by Han Jiang, the prime minister, and there is a saying that "the deacon of the Prime Minister of the History Museum: Shi has been to the county for more than 20 days", Han Jiang took the servant of the Ministry of Officials as the Tongping chapter and supervised the revision of the history of the country in April of the seventh year of Xining, and he left in August of the eighth year;[75] and Su Shi moved from Hangzhou to Mizhou in September of the seventh year and arrived in Mizhou on December 3. [76] In addition, the two books "The Book of Robbers and Rewards" and "The Book of Salt in the Above" were both written by Wen Yanbo in Mizhou, and when Wen Yanbo was appointed as the envoy of the Hedong Festival, Shou Situ and the Judge of the Daimyo's Mansion in the Servant, and stayed in Beijing. [77] In addition, the "Book of Answering Shu Huan" and "Answering the Book of Huang Lu Zhishu" were written in Xuzhou, and the "Book of Answering Song Temple" has "Shi self-pretending to guard Pengcheng, that is, he wants to ask questions for a book, and he has been suffering for a long time, but he is the first to do it, and he is ashamed to be unspeakable", which was also written when he was in Xuzhou. [78]
According to their contents, the three books of "Huangzhou Shangwen Lu Gongshu", "He Zhangzi Houshu" and "Reply to Li Duanshushu" were all written when Huangzhou was demoted after the "Wutai Poetry Case". Because "Xie Zhang Taibao Wrote the Book of the Tombs of the Ancestors" is placed after the "Huangzhou Shangwen Lu Gongshu", according to the example of "poems and texts before and after, roughly chronological" in the Southern Song Dynasty Hangben's "Dongpo Collection", then the "Book of Xie" was also written when Su Shi was in Huangzhou, so it seems inappropriate to tie it in the first year of Yuanfeng. Later, Liu Anshi tasted and said, "At the turn of the autumn and winter of the second year of Yuanfeng, Dongpo went down to the imperial history prison, and the people of the world were in pain, and they looked around and did not dare to save it." When Zhang Andao was in Nanjing, he angrily wrote a letter and wanted to attach it to Nanjing, but the government officials did not dare to accept it, but ordered his son to be held to Dengwen Yuan to vote, and he was stupid and cowardly, and he did not dare to vote. After a long time, Dongpo was released from prison. Later, Dongpo saw its copy, because of the tongue for a long time, people asked why, Dongpo did not answer. Later, the son also saw it, and the cloud: 'It is appropriate for my brother to stick out his tongue.' At this time, Zhang Shuli is being forced. Or ask the reason, Ziyou said: "I don't see Zheng Chang's rescue cover is wide, and he is sparse and cloudy, "There is no permission and history on the top, and there is no gold and Zhang Zhituo below", this sentence is the anger of Emperor Xuan. And forgiveness is to make a mistake, and the history has this calamity, and now it is to be ridiculed again, which is to benefit its anger. And what is the crime of Dongpo, the name is too high, and the court is victorious. Today's Andao is a cloud, "in fact, the strange material of the world", which does not provoke the anger of the master, so it is said for this reason." [79] Therefore, Su Shi has been very cautious since he was released from prison and demoted to Huangzhou, so as not to cause trouble, such as his "Reply to Li Duanshushu" has a cloud "After offending, he did not dare to write"; [80] There is even a saying in the "Huangzhou Shangwen Lu Gongshu" that "when the public reads it, it is just burned". [81] This can be seen. Because the Chinese characters of "Tomb Table" and "Book of Thanks" involve "The Theory of Identifying Adultery", Su Shidang, who was afraid that he would not be able to avoid trouble, did not want to cause trouble with this, and Zhang Fangping probably would not have written such an article attacking Wang Anshi as a "traitor" and causing trouble to the world at this time, so as to increase Su Shi's crisis.
(2) Due to the increasingly fierce party struggle during the Shen and Zhe periods, Su Shi after the "Wutai Poetry Case" was much more cautious in writing poems. At the beginning of Yuan Youchu, "Sima Wenzheng Gongxue, Fan Shu Gong took Su Hanlin's "Xingzhi" as a chronicle, and tied it to the inscription. Hanlin was a book stone, and with the subtle meaning of the "Spring and Autumn Period", he advised the public holiday: "Shi does not quit the book, I am afraid it is not the blessing of the three families." 'Just change the name.' [82] In this regard, Zhu Xi of the Southern Song Dynasty commented on the cloud: "Fan Shugong's "Epitaph of Wen Gong" is all based on Dongpo's "Xingzhi", and the inscriptions made later mostly remember the traitorous party affairs at that time. Dongpo ordered it to be changed, and the Duke of Shu ordered Dongpo to do it himself, because they all came out with the name of the Duke of Shu, but there was nothing to do afterwards. If Fan did it, I am afraid that it will inevitably be dug up by the villain. [83] However, after Zhezong's pro-government, Su Shi was still repeatedly belittled, and he was even included in the "Yuanyou Party" after his death. In April of the second year of Chongning of Huizong, "Yihai destroyed the "Dongpo Anthology", "Tang Jian", "Feng Zicai Anthology", "Qin Bachelor", "Yu Zhang", "Sansu Anthology", "Dongzhai Chronicle", "Yuzhang Shujian", "Xiangshan Lu", "Meishan Collection", "Other Collection", "Po Ci", "Liu Gongfu's Poems", "Chao", "Zhang", "Mr. Huang's Anthology", "Qin Bachelor's Essays". [84] At that time, there was not "a decree, should be the world's monument, the author of the Dongpo book, and a case of destruction." Gaiben was invited by Huo Ying to be sentenced to prison on Huainan West Road". [85] The late Wang Tingqi Zeng Yun: "The books of the time were afraid of crime, and the two books of Po and Gu were all destroyed. [86] When the government made peace thereafter, the ban was slightly relaxed. However, the five-year ban on Xuanhe became more severe, so on July 13 of the year, the Chinese book said: Kanhui Fujian and other roads were recently printed Su Shi, Sima Guang's anthologies, etc. Edict: In the future, people will be taught to learn Yuanyou's scholarship, and those who violate the system will be guilty of the same crime as those who print and sell. See the collection of printed and sold papers, in Beijing ordered Kaifeng Mansion, Sichuan Road, Fujian Road ordered Zhuzhou Army to destroy the board". [87] On the afternoon of October of the sixth year, he issued an edict that "those who collect and use Su and Huang Zhiwen will be ordered to be burned, and the offender will be judged as disrespectful." [88] In the winter of the sixth year of Xuanhe, he issued an edict to "Shen Yan" to ban books: "I have been serving since the beginning, and I will abolish Yuanyou's academics." Compared with the year, Su Shi and Huang Tingjian are restored. Shi and Tingjian were convicted of the temple, and they were not righteous, and the text was only a word, and they were ordered to burn it and not to save it, and the violators were judged as disrespectful. "To Qinzong" Jingkang Chu quit. [89]
At the same time, Wang Anshi's status is like the sky: in June of the third year of Chongning, "Zhu You, with Wang Anshi with Confucius Temple". In the first month of the third year of Zhenghe, "Zhu You, posthumously crowned Wang Anshi as King Shu, Ziyan as Linchuan Bo, and served Wenxuan Wang Temple". [90] Therefore, Shao Bo's "Shaw Brothers Hearing and Seeing the Later Record" said:
Since Shaosheng, the ministers of power have coerced the successor of the Shenzong as a changer, and they must first coerce Wang Jinggong. Cai's Zhi Jing Gong is a saint. As soon as the world is talking about derogating Jing Gong, it says: "If you don't demean Jing Gong, you slander Shenzong, and you are not loyal to the succession." "The righteous argument is completely wasted, the hook party is incomprehensible, and the benevolent gentleman knows that it will be a disaster of the other day, and its fierceness is irreversible, and there is no way to save it. Chen Wanying was in tears and asked the doctor Liu Anshizhi to say: "What can I do?" The relatives of the instrument were learned by Sima Wenzhenggong, and he was extremely brave and wise, saying: "If you don't go from Shenzong, you can't save yourself." Therefore, Yingzhong's anti-Shu Cai family's Jing Gong's "Diary" slandered the gods and sects, and said "Zun Yao Ji" cloud. If the mind is not equal to Jing Gong, then Cai's can be cut, the correct theory can be released, the hook party can be solved, and the disaster of the other day can be saved. Yingzhong sat down to die. [91]
Therefore, if Su Shi's self-compiled version and even the Northern Song Dynasty edition of the "Dongpo Collection" has indeed included this "Book of Thanks", and also returned the cloud and "Fu Meng again showed the ancestors of the "Tomb Table", and specially contained an article "Distinguishing Adultery", "However, the Si people use small decimal numbers to deceive the world, the world is unconscious, and I am afraid that there will be a sigh of no one in the future", those who tried their best to find fault with Su Shi's writing in the Zhe and Hui periods in search of evidence of the crime probably would not have turned a blind eye to it, and did not see a single word about it.
(3) Regarding the connection between Su Xun's "Theory of Distinguishing Adultery", Zhang Fangping's "Tomb Table" and Su Shi's "Book of Thanks", Hu Shiwei wrote a short article to explain Ye Mengde's "Summer Retreat" Yun "Ming Yun wrote an article on "Distinguishing Adultery", and secretly dedicated An Dao,...... and not to show Ou Wenzhong", because Ouyang Xiuwei wrote "Epitaph" for Su Xun, and did not mention "The Theory of Distinguishing Treachery", so it is hereby stated to dispel the doubts of future generations. [92] In other words, these three texts "have their own mutually corroborating relationship", but as far as the analysis of historical data is concerned, the most controversial and inconclusive person between the two sides of the debate today lies in Su Shi's "Book of Thanks". That is, the key point and important premise that Su Shi's "Book of Thanks" is not based on by the pseudo-trustee, that is, it asserts that "the Shichuan "Qianji" (i.e., "Dongpo Collection") is the self-editor of Dongpo's hand, and according to its source, the ancient laws and poems are interspersed, and there are few fallacies", and "Hangben was already in the world when Po Gong was unharmed", and the collection names and volumes of the two are the same. It can also prove that Hangben's compilation is really from the intention of the Su family", so "there must be no forgery in it". In short, that is, he believed that the Southern Song Dynasty remnants (i.e., the inner library books) published during the time of Xiaozong of the Southern Song Dynasty belonged to the Hangzhou system, and that the Hangzhou books that were "already in the world when Po Gong was unharmed" were "compiled by Su Shi's intentions", and Su Shi's self-compiled version of course "must not allow forgeries to enter", so Su Shi's "Book of Thanks", which was included in the fragments of the Southern Song Dynasty, is naturally authentic and not false. However, although "the Song Dynasty Hangben Su Shi Collection is not available today", there are quite few historical materials related to the early version of the "Dongpo Collection" seen today, and there are still contradictions between some historical materials, but after a detailed analysis of its related historical materials, it can still be found that this explanation of the origin of the early version of the "Dongpo Collection", which is almost regarded by scholars as self-evident by default, is quite doubtful.
According to one of them, the "rarest book" praised by the Song people as "the first collection of the world is the self-editor of Dongpo's hand", refers to the Gusu Jushi Yingjia edition, not to the Hangben that "was already in the world when Po Gong was unharmed". "Tiaoxi Yuyin Cong Words" cloud:
The Dongpo anthology is in the world, and its name is different, but the two collections of poems and essays of "Daquan" and "Beicheng" are the most, as said, the truth is half the same. Later, Ju Shiying's family published the big-character "Dongpo Before and After Collection", which is the most rare book. The biography "The First Collection" is the self-editor of Dongpo's hand, with its source, the ancient rhythm and poetry are intertwined, and there are few fallacies. For example, the poems of the Imperial History Mansion do not want to be passed on to the world, and "The Old Man's Line" and "The Painting of the King of Shen" are not his works, so they are all gone. [93]
and the third volume of "Xitang Collection of Old Stories" also praised "Guxu Jushiying's "Dongpo Complete Works" is very described, and it is rarely absurd, and it is very rewardable." [94] Ju Shiyingzi Yanshi, a native of Suzhou, tasted the official Privy Council editor. [95] The history of Shengzhang in the Zhenghe period of the three knowledge of Suzhou (Pingjiang Mansion), and "in July of the first year of Xuanhe, the ministers said that the chapter kept the Pingjiang Day, borrowed money from the wealthy people's house in Shiying's house, moved thousands of hundreds, asked for entrustment, and learned that he was in his hands, and the matter was noisy." The chapter then took the wife of the woman and the foreign council". [96] "Wu Junzhi", volume 28, Ju Shiying, in the sixth year of Xuanhe, Shen Hui, Jin Shidengdi. [97] Although the "Dongpo Collection" published by the former residence Shiyingjia has not been passed down to later generations, it can still be inferred that the "Dongpo Before and After Collection" was published in the early years of the Southern Song Dynasty, and after the Hangben that "was already in the world when the Po Gong was unharmed". Therefore, it seems that the reputation of Ju Shiying's family book "Dongpo Qianji" published according to "the Shichuan "Qianji" is the "best book" published by Dongpo is not allowed to be transferred by the way to praise Hangben. As for the Hangben, Chen Zhensun's "Zhizhai Shulu Solution" states that it "was already in the world when Po Gong was unharmed", referring to the editions that were printed much earlier than those published in the Southern Song Dynasty, implying that the quality of their compilation is more reliable, but it does not "prove that the compilation of Hangben is actually from Su's intention".
Second, Su Shi's poems and essays were widely disseminated in society during his lifetime, and many of them compiled collections for him,[98] but there were many errors in them and mistaken collections of others' works. Su Shi said to himself: "There are many poets and writers in the world, and the truth is half of the falsehood, and most of them are changed by the vulgar, and reading them makes people unfair." [99] According to Su Shi's "Answer to Chen's Five Songs of Preaching No. 2":
The poems of Qiantang are all written frankly, and they are annoyed to include them one by one, only to beat their short ears. A certain sick city people seek profit, good to publish a certain clumsy article, want to destroy its board, and want to publish it even more? Take his words from the public, and send a copy of the order. The one shown today is not only free, but also has other humanity in the process. [100]
and "Answer to Chen's Preaching Five Songs No. 3" cloud:
It is a Shinto tablet, several epitaphs, the tablet cover is ordered, and the chronicle is not resigned to Jingrenzhang's deed. If you want to write a presentation, you are not flawless, and you can see it when you hear it. [101]
These two books were written in May of the fourth year of Yuan You, when Su Shi left Beijing to know Hangzhou. It is known that the "first collection" in the "Seven Episodes of Dongpo" is Su Shi's "hand-edited author", but from the "Answer to Chen's Preaching Five Songs", "When you have a little time, take all the old poems and texts, and save them as a set", knowing that Su Shi has not compiled his own poems into a collection at this time. Also, Jingren is the character of Fan Zhen, died in the leap December of the second year of Yuan You, and was buried in August of the fourth year of Yuan You. [102] However, the "Three of the Five Poems of Replies to Chen's Preaching" said that he "wanted to write ("Fan Jingren's Epitaph"), but he was not flawless. It refers to the collection of Su Shi's poems compiled by others and included in this "Epitaph" that has been "opened" and printed by Jingshi at this time. In addition, the "Shaw Brothers Wenjian Houlu" said that "mistaken 'spring mash' for 'fragrant mash'" of the "Jingshi printed version of the "Dongpo Collection",[103] the full sentence of this poem is "the border city is full of wind and snow, and the spring mash and the monarch are forced to say goodbye", which comes from the first couplet of Su Shi's "Sending Zeng Zhongxi to the Judgment of Rujingshi", when it was written at the end of the eighth year of the Yuan Dynasty, when Su Shi knew Dingzhou,[104] it was recorded in the third volume of the current biography "Dongpo Later Collection", then it is known that the "Jingshi printed version of the "Dongpo Collection" of the Shaw Family, when it was based on the Su Shi anthology published by the Jingshi of Yuan Youjian, it was added to the Su Shi anthology published by the Jingshi of Yuan Youjian.
However, when was Su Shi's "hand-edited" "Qianji" compiled? [105] The Chenkui Pavilion Tablet was written on the third day of the first month of the sixth year of the Yuan Dynasty, and it was written shortly before that. [106] The "Annals of Su Shi" said that "the forty-volume "Dongpo Collection" of this biography ends in "Hun Ling Gong Yanyu Chao Entu", which was written in Hangzhou in the spring of the sixth year of Yuan You". [107] On the 26th day of the first month of the sixth year of the reign of Yuan You, Su Shi removed the official department of Shangshu, and on February 4, he changed the decree of the Hanlin Bachelor, and was dismissed from the resignation of the Son of Heaven, so he left Hangzhou in early March and went north to Beijing. [108] However, the "First Collection" does not include poems written by Su Shi in the sixth year of the Yuan Dynasty and later, so it is inferred that this "First Collection" was compiled in the early sixth year of the Yuan Dynasty.
As for the "Dongpo Later Collection", the Song people also called it Su Shi's self-editor, such as Zhou Bida's "This Dynasty Su Shi compiled the "Dongpo Before and After Collection", and also listed the poems. [109] On the occasion of the Two Song Dynasty, Sun Mao's "and Su Shoujiwen" Yun and "Luancheng Three Episodes", Huangmenshou compiled the times, and there was nothing left behind. "Dongpo Later Collection", or Yun is Liu Yuanzhong's collection of twenty volumes, there is room for unfinished. "Recital" and "Formula", there is no definitive version in the world, and the public collection can be seen at once?"[110] This Liu Yuanzhong, who immediately had a correspondence with Su Shi, was the capital of Cao Liu Wei. [111] Su Shi in "Answer to Liu Weidu Cao Shu" slightly cloud:
Twenty volumes of books and texts were taught and compiled. Shi Pingsheng is known in the world with words and words, and he also uses this to take advantage of others, and the gains and losses make up for each other, so it is better not to do it. In this way, he often wants to burn the pen and inkstone, for the silent people, and the habit of the karma can not be exhausted, which is also said to be scattered with the birds. I don't know how to follow silently, pick up the embellishments, and leave nothing behind. The shame of the sweat can be a ring of many words. ...... There is not a single false or false in the twenty volumes shown here, and there are few fallacies. [112]
That is, the twenty volumes of the "Dongpo Later Collection" compiled by Liu Wei have also been reviewed by Su Shi, "there is no falsity, and there are few fallacies", Zhou Bida may be in this sense and "Su Shi self-compiled "Dongpo Before and After Collection". The eighth volume of the "Dongpo Later Collection" contains the "Tianqing Guan Milk Spring Fu", and the fourth library book "Dongpo Complete Works" volume 33 is at the end of the "Tianqing Guan Milk Spring Fu" note: "A certain person made this endowment in Hainan, did not try to show people, both crossed the sea, and personally wrote two copies, one to show Qin Shaoyou, and the other to show Liu Yuanzhong." March 21 of the first year of the founding of the Yasukuni Dynasty. [113] It is inferred that Su Shi's endowment should be sent to Liu Wei at the same time as the "Answer to Liu Weidu Cao Shu".
Su Shi died on July 28 of the first year of the founding of Yasukuni. For example, volume 15 "The Legend of the Shunji Wangmiao's New Stone Tomb" was written after "The First Day of April in the First Year of the Yasukuni Dynasty", volume 20 "Ode to Guanyin Bodhisattva" was written on "May Day of the First Year of the Yasukuni Dynasty, Returning from Hainan to Jinling" and Volume 4 "Elder Answering the Path to Shanlin" was written on July 26, which is a masterpiece of the book. [114] Apparently from those who have since made up for it. [115] In April of the second year of Chongning, Huizong of the Song Dynasty "ordered to burn Su Shi's "Dongpo Collection" and the printing plate of "Later Collection". [116] This "Later Collection" should have been compiled before April of the second year of Chongning.
According to the Song people, there is a phenomenon of supplementation in the "Dongpo Collection", and there are also false authors in the poems and texts that have been added. For example, Hu Zai of the Southern Song Dynasty tasted the clouds in "Tiaoxi Yuyin Cong Words": "There is a poem "King Shen Painting a Horse" in the "Dongpo Collection", that is, the apocalypse. Later, Gusu Jushiying's family magazine "Dongpo Before and After Collection" was deleted. [117] When Ju Shiying's family published the "Collection of Before and After the Dongpo", the manuscript on which it was based mistakenly included the poem "King Shen Painting Horses" written by Cai Tianqi. Hu Zai Youyun:
"Dongpo Later Collection" has "three palindromes on the title brocade map", one of which is a cloud: "The flowers fall on the spring evening, and the green grass remains, and the night is cool and the moon is half withered." People follow the distant geese in the twilight of the border city, and the rain reflects the sparse curtains and embroiders the pavilion. The second cloud: "The red hand silk thousand words brocade, the old man's new song nine intestines." The wind blows the snow and the bones are sad, and the tears are sprinkled with tears and hatred to see Lang. Its three clouds: "Be ashamed to look at a palindrome brocade, brocade like Wenjun, don't hate deeply." The head white is sad and sorrowful, and the broken heart is a broken string. "Huaihai Collection" contains Dongpo Bayun: "Yu Shao saw a Jiangnan Ben, and then someone inscribed more than ten poems, all of which are wonderful, and now remember three of them. However, this poem was not written by Dongpo. Shaoyou Youyun: "Zizhan remembers that the poems inscribed by Jiangnan are incomplete, and the rest of them are seen, and they remember their five uniques, and now they will make up for Zizhan's legacy." That is, the "Five Palindromic Poems" contained in the "First Collection of Cong Words" is also. The world thinks that it is made by less travel, and it is not also. [118]
The twelfth volume of the "Dongpo Qianji" includes this "Three Palindromics on the Inscription Brocade Map", and the twelfth volume of the fragment of the "Dongpo Collection" published by Xiaozong of the Southern Song Dynasty also includes this poem. Press, Hu Zai's "Dongpo Later Collection" may be regarded as a "former collection". Qin Guan Yunyun, contained in the second volume of the second collection of the "Huaihai Collection", entitled "Su Zizhan Ji Jiangnan inscribed poems are not complete and the rest of the taste of the record of its five unique today to supplement the legacy of Zizhan". According to the research of later generations, the five poems recorded by Qin Guan "are the poems of Kong Yi's father, see "Qingjiang Three Holes", and the title is "Inscription Brocade Xuanji Map". [119] Obviously, this poem could not have been mistakenly received by the "Dongpo Hand Editor", but was infiltrated when it was circulated and copied. Therefore, it seems that there is no way to verify or falsify whether the Hangben of the Southern Song Dynasty, which "was already in the world when Po Gong was unharmed", and whether the fragment of the "Dongpo Collection" published by Xiaozong of the Southern Song Dynasty, which "belongs to the same version system as the Hangben", is consistent with the Hangben, but this fragment of the Southern Song Dynasty, which is known as the "rarest book" today, does have at least "one forgery", so the so-called "no one has been able to point out any of the forgeries" so far, and as a proof of the "Book of Thanks" collected in Volume 29 The premise of being true or false is obviously untenable.
In addition, the "Zhizhai Shulu Problem Solving" cited above has a cloud "Dongpo Collection" "Hangzhou and Shu are the same, but Hangzhou does not have a "Ying Zhao Collection". He also recorded the forty-six volumes of "Dongpo Collection", Yun "Po's great-grandson gave Shiqiao Ji Zhenkan's family collection in Jian'an, roughly the same as Hangben", and "Masha Bookstore has "Daquan Collection", which also contains "Zhilin", miscellaneous sayings, etc., and is also mixed with Yingbin and Xiaopo's texts, and there are false intruders. There is Zhang for Jizhou, take Jian'an to publish all the legacy, without examination, in the edict, policy discussion. Gai Jian'an also does not have a "Collection of Edicts". And before the second set of "Tiaoxi Yuyin Cong Words" volume 28 "Dongpo Three" is also before the "Dongpo Before and After Collection" of the Yunju Shiying family magazine, there are "the most poems and essays in the two collections of "Daquan" and "Beicheng", but during the "truth and falsehood are half".
In addition, the Southern Song Dynasty Xie Ge in the fourth year of Chunxi's September Shuo's "Huangyu History Collection Preface" cloud and "Yu taste Meishan Jingshan Yuan's "Dongpo" and "Daquan" two episodes, which were published by his grandson Shu Shou Zhonghu and his younger brother Jiwen, compared with other places, the most unmistakable, and what is passed on today is based on this book." [120] Press, Zhonghu is Su Fu character. According to the history of Shaoxing in May of the 14th year, "the right is the Zhan dialect: 'The left Chao Sanlang, the new knowledge of Suining Mansion Su Fu Ju is the place of thought, the knowledge is shallow, the court is convenient to the county, and the year is not good, wandering close to the ground, watching current affairs, artificially cutting teeth. 'The edict descends to the second official, and the task of fun'. [121] In October of the sixteenth year of Shaoxing, "Chaofeng Lang Zhi Suining Mansion Su Fu Fu Wen Pavilion to be systemized". [122] In the first month of the twenty-fifth year of Shaoxing, "Fuwen Pavilion is to be made in the new knowledge of Raozhou Su Fu begging shrine." Shang said: 'The court first discussed a truce, and Fu quite thought so. and Wang Lun was left behind, and then he was reinstated, and now he is no longer willing to go out of Shu. 'It is to lift the Taizhou Chongdao Temple with a symbol.' [123] In May of the twenty-sixth year of Shaoxing, Fu Wenge Zhi Bachelor, raised Taizhou Chongdao Temple Su Fu Zhi Qiongzhou. In October, Su Fu died in Qiongzhou. [124] It is inferred that the publication of the "Dongpo Collection" was about the sixteenth year of Shaoxing when the Suining Mansion was known.
Hong Mai's "Rong Zhai Five Strokes" tastes the "Dongpo Collection" and has "two large and small copies engraved by the Meishan Merit Temple of the Su Family, and Ji Zhen engraved in Lin'an, and Jiangzhou Ben, Masha Bookstore "Daquan Collection". [125] Press, Ji Zhen is Su Qiaozi. According to the cloud of "Rong Zhai Essays", Yu Jiaxi pointed out that Su Qiao's "Dongpo Collection" was "not only from the construction of Anben, but also engraved in Lin'an". [126] "Examination of Chinese Books in Japan" Yun Japanese Cabinet Library Collection has "Inscription of Su Qiao in the Ninth Year of the Ninth Year of the Dry Road", [127] which seems to be this book. In addition, in the second and fifth volumes of the "(Yongzheng) Fujian Tongzhi", Su Qiao knew Jianzhou during the reign of Xiaozong Chunxi. Jian'an should have been at this time. Hongmai Soyun "Su's Meishan Merit Temple engraved two large and small copies", now there is a fragment, it is the Southern Song Dynasty Ningzong time printed. [128]
The "Dongpo Collection" by Shangzhigu Su Jushi was printed after the "Great Collection" and "Beicheng" of Masha Bookstore, and the printed copies published by the Su Fu brothers in the middle and late Shaoxing periods were all before the fragment of the "Dongpo Collection" published by Xiaozong, the "most rare book" that survives today, and the Jian'an version engraved by Su Qiao was later. The situation in Jiangzhou is unknown, Fu Zengxiang's "Tibetan Garden Group Books Jing Yan Lu" volume 13 records "Dongpo Collection" 10 volumes (volumes 6 to 15), "Later Collection" 9 volumes (volumes 1 to 3, volumes 5 to 10), "avoid the Song Dynasty to the word 'cautious', review its font, and suspect the Jiangxi carving". [129] This is not specified. The Jizhou edition published by Zhang's family, that is, the "Chunyou Jiachen Luling County Inscription" in Zhao Xiben's "Reading Appendix", is the "deletion" of the Jian'an book, but in fact, the "addendum" of the Jian'an book. [130] Therefore, it may be argued that the first six episodes of the extant Ming Chenghua edition of the Dongpo Seven Episodes were from the Southern Song Dynasty Cao Xun edition, and that Cao Ben "immediately re-engraved according to the Shu version", and that "except for the Shu Edition, the other six episodes (including the Dongpo Collection) are all the same as the Hang Ben", which is not sufficient.
After Qinzong ascended the throne, the prohibitions against the Yuanyou party were lifted, so after entering the Southern Song Dynasty, there were quite a few people in the world who collected Su Shi's scattered poems and texts and compiled them into a collection and published them, during which they were often mistakenly included in the "forgery". For example, at the beginning of the Southern Song Dynasty, Wang Gong's "Four and Six Words" "At the end of the first volume, his father was known as Teng Fu's slander of the beggar county, and Su Shi was mistakenly engraved in the collection. According to the handwriting, it will not be false. This article is still contained in the collection today, and it is lost in the correction." [131] According to Wang Gongyun: "The first son made a statement for Teng, and the hand is still there, but it is mistakenly printed in this article in Dongpo City." [132] This article is contained in the fifteenth volume of the "Concert Collection" of the present biography of the "Seven Episodes of Dongpo", with the title "Dai Tengfu defends the beggar county". Chen Shan's "New Words of Lice and Lice" also recorded: ""Dongpo Collection" has "Ye Jia's Biography", which is also written by Chen Biaomin. ...... There is no complete collection of Jing Gong and Dongpo texts so far. ...... In the "Po Collection", such as "Drunken Township" and "Sleeping Township", etc., the slang is shallow and close, and it is by no means a slope work. Or Yunpo only has "The Biography of Jiang Shaozhu", it is not. Today's market is often added and changed from time to time, in order to sell quickly, and the official does not prohibit it. Although the "Ou Gong Ji" has been compiled on the eastern slope, there are still articles that have been added to it, but it has not been compiled"[133] This can be seen. However, this phenomenon not only exists in the Dongpo Collection, but also exists in the anthologies compiled and printed in the early years of the Southern Song Dynasty, such as Ouyang Xiu, Wang Anshi, and Sima Guang. This is the social and cultural demand of the Song Dynasty, and the popularization of book printing technology, so the literary and literary collections were compiled again and again, and often "continued" poems and texts in the transmission and printing, which is also a common thing, and the Song people have many records about it.
To sum up, it can be seen that the relationship between Su Shi's "hand-compiled version" and Hangben, Hangben has long been dead, and the Song people have not left much record except for Chen Zhensun's "Zhizhai Shulu Solution" cloud and "Cover Hangben, when Po Gong was unharmed, it has been in the world". Since the Hangben includes the first and second collections of the "Dongpo Collection", and the present biography includes the Southern Song Dynasty Xiaozong's edition of the "Dongpo Later Collection", which included Su Shi's text shortly before his death, it is known that its compilation should be behind him, so it can be inferred that the so-called Hangben could not have "been in the world when Po Gong was unharmed". Therefore, if the "collection name and number of volumes" of Su Shi's anthology listed in Su Zhe's "(Su Shi) Epitaph" are the same as those of Hangben. It can also prove that Hangben's compilation is actually from Su's intention. "Dongpo Collection" is also compiled by Shi Shou", so the assertion that "when Po Gong is unharmed", Hang Ben "cannot be a forgery" is quite questionable.
5. Whether the "Shaw Brothers' Hearing and Seeing" is the first to mention the "Theory of Distinguishing Adultery"
Written at the turn of the Song Dynasty and the Song Dynasty, Shao Bowen's "Records of the Hearing and Seeing of the Shaw Brothers" contains Su Xun's article "On Distinguishing Adultery", saying that "the Treatise on Distinguishing Adultery" is "contained in the tomb of Mr. Duzhang Wending", and describes the origin of Su Xun's writing of "Distinguishing Adultery" and the influence of his text. [134] However, analyzing the text of "Shaw Brothers' Wenjianlu", it can be seen that it is not completely recorded from Zhang Fangping's "Tomb Table of Mr. Wen'an", for example, the "Tomb Table" states that Su Xun wrote "The Theory of Distinguishing Adultery" shortly after the death of Wang Anshi's mother in the eighth year of Jiayou, while Shao Bowen changed it to the first acquaintance of Wang Anshi and Su Xun in Jiazhi;
Because there are many doubts in Shao Bowen's record, Li Fu of the Qing Dynasty said that the article "On Distinguishing Adultery" "was first seen in the "Shaw Brothers Wenjianlu". "Wenjianlu" was compiled in the second year of Shaoxing, to the seventeenth year, and Shen Fei, a professor of Wuzhou studies, compiled the collection of Lao Su's writings, appendix two volumes, which contained Zhang Wending's Gong Fangping's "Laoquan Tomb Table", and "Distinguishing Adultery". There is also a pass of Dongpo's "Xie Zhanggong's Tomb Book", which is dedicated to "Identifying Adultery". The three texts are all fakes, and they are sought by the circumstances of the day, which are uneven and inconsistent", so "it is suspected that "The Tomb Table" and "Identifying the Adulterer" are both made up by Shaw Brothers after the fact. [135] Cai Shangxiang also deduced that these three texts were all forgeries of the Shaw Brothers based on the many slanderous words of Wang Anshi in Shao Bowen's book. However, Li and Cai's arguments are not sufficient, and there is quite a lot of room for discussion, or only from the similarities in the tone of the text, so they are also suspicious. However, this opened up the controversy over the authenticity of the author of "The Theory of Distinguishing Adultery", because most of the people below Li Fu and Cai Shangxiang who held the false theory thought that Su Xun's "On Distinguishing Adultery", Zhang Fangping's "Tomb Table" and Su Shi's "Book of Thanks" were all written by Shao Bowen, so to a considerable extent, they transferred the debate on whether "On Distinguishing Adultery" was forged to the discussion of whether "On Distinguishing Adultery" was forged by Shao Bowen.
As early as 1908, Liang Qichao wrote "Wang Jinggong" (later known as "The Biography of Wang Anshi"), which discussed the authenticity of "The Theory of Distinguishing Adultery", and basically stated the theory of Li Fu and Cai Shangxiang, calling it a forgery of Shao Bowen: "Fu Mingyun is not a saint, so let him try to slander Jing Gong for this article, what is enough for Jing Gong's disease! However, the hypocrite is self-hypocritical and cannot be regarded as true." The Shaw Brothers and the like are just slandering Jing Gong and falsely accusing Mingyun". [136] Hu Shi also said that "The Theory of Distinguishing Adultery is a forgery, and Li Fu distinguishes it best." [137] Later, Deng Guangming pointed out in the "Preface" of Wang Anshi: "The Theory of Distinguishing Adultery pretends to be the work of Su Xun of the Northern Song Dynasty, but in fact it was fabricated by a literati in the early years of the Southern Song Dynasty. In the early years of the Southern Song Dynasty, the political aspect was full of opposition to the new party and the new law, and ordinary literati and scholars were extremely admired for the works of Su Xun and Su Shi", so "Shao Bowen, the son of Shao Yong, a conservative party member in the Northern Song Dynasty, pretended to be a prophet in the name of Su Xun, and listed some events in a shadowy manner", and wrote "On Distinguishing Adultery", "It was concluded that once Wang Anshi was in power, he would inevitably bring disaster to the world." Therefore, the "Theory of Distinguishing Treachery" was made in place of the "gentry and big landlords" who opposed Wang Anshi's reforms, so after the successful forgery, it was immediately widely disseminated. [138] As a result, scholars such as Zhang Peiheng and Wang Shuizhao wrote articles emphasizing that long before Shao Bowen wrote "Shaw Brothers' Wenjianlu", Fang Shao's "Bozhai Edition" had already written "The Theory of Distinguishing Adultery":
When Duke Wen was in Hanyuan, he tasted the guests and went to the guests, and the old man Su Shaoliu stayed alone, and said to the public: "Who is the one who is suitable to sit and have a prisoner's head mourning?" Xun said: "From a certain point of view, this person will chaos the world at different times, so that he will have the ambition to establish a dynasty, although the wise lord will also bewitch him." Why does Nehan swim with it?" Xun retreated, so he wrote "The Theory of Distinguishing Adultery" and traveled to the world. It was Shi Jiefu who was the librarian, and Ming Yun was also clothed. [139]
Fang Spoon's "Bozhai Edition" is divided into two systems: three volumes and ten volumes. The text of the Treatise on the Identification of Adultery is contained in only three volumes. There are only ten volumes recorded in the "Sub-part and Novels" of "History of the Song Dynasty, Art and Literature", and the eleventh volume of Chen Zhensun's "Zhizhai Shulu Solution", and the "Bozhai Edition" quoted in the Southern Song Dynasty Zhushu are all from the ten-volume version. "Although the three-volume version contains 110 articles, although it is 81 articles less than the 10-volume version, there are 26 articles that are not contained in the 10-volume version", so some scholars have speculated that this three-volume version "may be the first draft of the manuscript before Fang Shao made this edition, which was not published at that time, and was only widely distributed after it was engraved into the "Barnyard Sea" during the Wanli period of the Ming Dynasty. [140] Zhang Peiheng pointed out that "the ten-volume version is actually an expanded version of the three-volume version, which has been supplemented and deleted", and it has been verified that "the three-volume book should be written in seven years after Xuanhe", and "the ten-volume book should be written eight years after Shaoxing". As for Shao Bowen's "Hearing and Seeing Records in the second year of Shaoxing", it is probably based on Zhang Fangping's "Epitaph" and the article "On Distinguishing Adultery". It can be seen that "the Song people's notes mention "Distinguishing Adultery" should be the earliest." [141]
Zhang Wen believes that Shao Bowen's writing of Wenjianlu in the second year of Shaoxing is based on Shao Bowen's Wenjianlu Self-Preface and his son Shao Bozhi's Preface. Shao Bowen's "Self-Introduction" has clouds:
Bowen flea took the reason of the first gentleman, personally received the seniors, served the family with the husband, lived in the township party, traveled to the eunuch to learn, and had a lot of prefaces. The animal does not dare to be virtuous, and the old scene invades, and occasionally bears the responsibility of the deceased, and the like is a book, called "Hearing and Seeing Records", and it is still a few Yan. On November 15 of the second year of Shaoxing, Renshen, Shao Bowen, Henan. [142]
Shao Bo's "Preface" is the cloud "Ancestor...... This book came out late, although the guest is sick, the pen is not sharpened, and his heart is sad. The ancestors were unfortunate, but they were worthy of the words of his life, and they were praised by the system. Bo is not good, and there is no way to show the virtue of the ancestors. The class of his testament has been completed, and the "Wenjian Lu" is obtained in the absolute compilation and conciseness, which is the twentieth volume of the second volume, and has been passed down from generation to generation". [143] In addition, the fifth volume of the "Hearing and Seeing Record" contains "(Yuan You), and later supplemented by many saints in difficulties. After the collapse, the mourning is very much, and the courtiers can not be seen to be tired, and the edict is in decline, and it is said that the holy sacrifice of Zhaoci is said. [144] Because Empress Yuanyou collapsed in April of the first year of Shaoxing, she was called Zhaoci and martyred, and in April of the third year of Shaoxing, it was changed to Zhaoci Shengxian. [145] Therefore, Zhangwen believes that "Shao Bowen's "Wenjianlu" was written in November of the second year of Shaoxing, and it had not yet been finalized by the time of Bowen's death in the fourth year of Shaoxing, and was later compiled by his son Shao Bo in separate volumes and then carried out in the world"; [146]
Deng Guangming agrees with Zhang Wen's view that the three-volume book of the Bo Zhai Bian was written in the seventh year of Xuanhe, but believes that the word "class" in Shao Bowen's "Wenjianlu Self-Preface" is "the meaning of the order", and "the word 'zhi' must refer to a number of records that have already been written", and pointed out that "if it were not for the accumulation of many entries, what would Shao Bowen have classified into a book? It was written seven or eight years ago or even more than ten years ago in the second year of Shaoxing, that is, two or three years earlier than the article in the three-volume "Bo Zhai Edition", and after it was written, it was widely disseminated and publicized in order to expand its influence, so that Fang Lao wrote it in the "Bo Zhai Edition" immediately after hearing about it? As Shao Bo said in the "Preface", "Wen Jianlu" was published after the death of Shaw, but it does not rule out that some entries were preceded by copying or engraving before the book was printed." He also cites Wang Anshi's "Gaoshu with Sun Tzu" as an example to prove that in the Song Dynasty, "it was very easy and common to publish articles or documents with few pages." Therefore, it is not possible to use the "Wenjianlu" printed four years after Shaoxing to refute Shao Bowen's account of the "Theory of Distinguishing Adultery" that was not circulated in the world seven years before Xuanhe." and further determined that "the information that Zhang Fangping wrote Lao Su's "Tomb Table" and Su Shi wrote Zhang Fangping's "Tomb Table" in his letter to thank Zhang Fangping for writing "Tomb Table" were both revealed for the first time in the same account of Shao Bowen, of course, it can be asserted that they were forged by Shao Bowen." [147] However, Wang Shuizhao wrote an article in support of Zhang's theory, arguing that Deng Wen Suoyun "After the Shaw Brothers forged the "Theory of Distinguishing Treachery", they first circulated a single article, which unfortunately has no evidence. [148] Later, Deng Guangming wrote another article to reiterate his argument that it was "completely wrong" to misinterpret "like a book" as "starting to write a book". [149] Wang Shuizhao also wrote another article to state his own statement, and gave the example of Zhu Benfeng, who was detained by the Jin Dynasty for 17 years in the first year of Song Jianyan in Yunnan, until he returned to the south in the thirteenth year of Shaoxing, and died the following year. Volume 121 of the "General Catalogue of the Four Libraries" examines Zhu Ben's notes "Qu Wei's Old News" written "Qu Wei's Old News" "recounting the relics of the Northern Song Dynasty, without a word about Jin, so it is called 'Old News'", and in Volume 10, Su Xun's "Discussion on Distinguishing Adultery" is mentioned in Volume 10, because at that time, Zhu Ben "It was difficult to see the "Shaw Clan's Wenjianlu" published four years later in Shaoxing in the north", so his "account of Su Xun's "Treatise on Distinguishing Adultery" should be the 'old news' obtained by Jin Qian, and it has nothing to do with Shao Shu. [150]
To sum up, Zhang Wen thinks that the phrase "like a book" refers to Shao Bowen's "Wenjianlu" in "November of the second year of Shaoxing", which seems to be a lost obstacle. However, Deng Wen's explanation of the writing process of "Shaw Brothers' Wenjianlu" and the text of "Distinguishing Adultery" in "Bozhai Edition" is copied from Shao Bowen, which is obviously reluctant. Judging from the current historical materials and the general situation of the notes written by the Song people, it can be concluded that the three-volume book of Fang Lao's "Bo Zhai Bian" was written before the "Shaw Brothers Wenjianlu", that is, the "Shaw Brothers Wenjianlu" is not the earliest Song people's notes that mention the "Theory of Distinguishing Adultery".
In addition, Fang Jian also said that Zong Ze died in the second year of Jianyan because there was a note cloud and Zong Ze "Jingkang Zhong was the deputy marshal, and then Yin Kaifeng died" because there was a note in the three-volume "Bo Zhai Edition", so "Fang Lao is the editor, and the earliest finalization was undoubtedly in the early Southern Song Dynasty", then Zhang Peiheng examined and bound the three-volume "Bo Zhai Edition" into a book in the seventh year of Xuanhe, "not without small mistakes". [151] However, Fang Jian is really suspicious of this. The inspection of the "Bozhai Edition" is based on the "Reading Zhai Series", and the school notes are published under the sentence "Ze Jingkang is the deputy marshal, and Yin Kaifeng is the pawn": "According to the three-volume version of the "Barnyard Sea" and the "Jinhua Series", there are no such thirteen characters. [152] The chapter also cites seven pieces of evidence in the book to prove that the three-volume "Bo Zhai Bian" was written in the seventh year of Xuanhe, and stresses: "The three-volume version is based on the Ming version of the Barnyard Sea; [153] According to the relevant texts of the three-volume and ten-volume editions, Zhang's statement can be derived from the above-mentioned thirteen characters of "Ze Jingkang Zhong is the deputy marshal, and Yin Kaifeng is the pawn of the later Yin", which should be added from the ten-volume version.
6. The time and motive for the writing of "The Theory of Distinguishing Adultery" and the relationship between the Su family and the Wang family
Regarding the time of writing "The Theory of Distinguishing Treachery", according to the books, there is probably a difference between the beginning of Jiayou and the end of Jiayou.
Zhang Fangping's "Mr. Wen'an's Tomb Table" cloud:
At the beginning of Jiayou, Wang Anshi's name was prosperous, and his party friends poured for a while, and his fate was said: "Since the birth of the people, there are only a few people." "He is a man of words who is better than a saint. Ouyang Xiu is also good, persuading Mr. to swim with him, and An Shi is also willing to hand it over to Mr. Mr. said: "I know that he is a person who is not close to people, and he is rarely troubled by the world." "Anshi's mother died, and the scholars and doctors all hung her, and Mr. was alone, making an article on "Distinguishing Adultery".
And said, "Mr. has not been in the stone for three years, and his words are believed." [154] According to the law, Wang Anshi's mother Wu Jiayou died in Beijing in August of the eighth year. [155] However, if "The Theory of Distinguishing Adultery" was written in the eighth year of Jiayou, because Su Shi and Wang Anshi first met in the first year of Jiayou, it would be quite a loss of Su Xun's "foresight" of "seeing the subtleties and knowing", that is, seeing Wang Anshi, he could identify him as a "great traitor", and more importantly, as pointed out by later generations, Su Xun's "move is unreasonable, and the mother of the friendship is mourned, not only does not hang, but instead makes the article "Identifying Adultery" viciously attacked, unless the two have a deep hatred or the author is psychopathic, ordinary people will never have such an unbelievable act." [156] Indeed, according to the "Silent Notes", Wang Anshi "Ding's mother was worried, she was fifty years old, she was too sad, she did not stay at home, and she took straw as a recommendation, and slept on the ground." [157] Such acts are the virtues of filial piety praised by secular traditions. Therefore, the "Theory of Distinguishing Adultery" emphasizes that "those who are not close to human feelings in everything are rarely guilty of great adultery", and Su Xun's behavior in this way is also obviously "those who are not close to human feelings", so they should also be classified as "great traitors"? It seems that in view of this, there are quite a few people in the writings of the Song people who advanced the time of writing "The Theory of Distinguishing Adultery" to the early years of Jiayou. Fang Lao's "Bo Zhai Edition" describes the clouds:
When Gong Wen was in Hanyuan, he tasted the guests, the guests went, and the old man Su Shaoliu stayed alone, and said to the public: "Who is the one who is suitable to sit with the head of the prisoner mourning?" The public said: "Wang Jiefu is also a man of literature and practice, and the son does not hear it?" Xun said: "From a certain point of view, this person will chaos the world at different times, so that he can aspire to establish a dynasty, although the wise lord will also be confused by him." Why does Nehan swim with it?" Xun retreated, so he wrote "The Theory of Distinguishing Adultery" and traveled to the world. It was Shi Jiefu who was the librarian, and Ming Yun was also clothed. [158]
According to the report, there are quite a few errors in the "Bozhai Edition". As one of them, Wen Gong is Sima Guang, to Shenzong Zhiping in March of the fourth year of the worship of Hanlin Bachelor, in April in addition to the Imperial History Zhongcheng, in September to return to the Hanlin Bachelor, to Xining three years of September out of the Yongxing Army. [159] Ouyang Xiu was removed from the Hanlin Bachelor in September of the first year of Zhihe, and the Privy Deputy in November of the fifth year of Jiayou. [160] It can be seen that the "Wen Gong" in the "Bo Zhai Edition" is regarded as "Ou Gong". Second, Su Xun was indeed clothed at the beginning of Jiayou, but although Wang Anshi tasted the special award of Jixian School in March of the second year of Zhihe, Wang Anshi "stubbornly did not worship"; Anshi is still tired and bows". [161] It can be proved that Wang Anshi of Jiayou was not yet a museum officer.
Later, Shao Bowen wrote "Shaw Brothers' Wenjianlu", according to Zhang Fangping's "Epitaph", quoted the full text of "On Distinguishing Adultery", and described the time when it was written.
Mr. Su Mingyun of Meishan, Jiayou first visited Beijing, when Wang Jinggong's name was prosperous, the party was with a while, and Ouyang Wenzhong was also good. Sir, Wen Zhongke also, Mr. Wen Zhong persuaded Mr. Jing to see Jing Gong, and Jing Gong was also willing to hand over to Mr. Yu. Mr. said: "I know that he is a person who is not close to people, and he is rarely troubled by the world." "Wrote an article on "Arguments on Adultery", which was also issued by Jing Gong. ...... After more than ten years, Jing Gong was a traitor, and all of them were inferior to Mr. [162]
According to the Shaw Brothers, instead of taking Zhang Fangping's "Tomb Table" and saying that "The Theory of Distinguishing Adultery" was written at the end of Jiayou, the Shaw Brothers renamed this article as written in the beginning of Jiayou, which is suspected to be a reference to Fang Lao's theory; and stated that "after more than ten years, Jing Gong was first appointed as a traitor", which was to cover up the loss of the "Tomb Table".
In addition, "The Tomb Table" said that "The Theory of Distinguishing Adultery" was completed, "it is not true that there were many people who saw it at that time", and "Bo Zhai Edition" Yun This article was written in the beginning of Jiayou, "walking in the world", and "Shaw Brothers Wenjianlu" also said that "Siwen came out, and many commentators thought it was otherwise". Although the statements are not the same, they all say that the "Theory of Distinguishing Adultery" was passed down to the world after it was written. However, considering the articles and discussions of people at that time or later, none of them were able to quote or discuss their words (except for the two articles "Tomb Table" and "Book of Thanks"), and even Sima Guang, who was famous for collecting contemporary historical materials, was called "a person who hears new things, that is, records them in the book, and remembers what he says", so there was a proverb at that time that "don't tell the truth about today",[163] and his "Records of Lianshui" recorded the words and deeds of many scholars and doctors (including Su Xun) at that time, but there was not only a single word about the article "On Distinguishing Adultery". For this reason, in response to Sima Guang's remark that "Lu Xianke's foresight is too late", Shao Bowen was quite puzzled: "If Mr. Mingyun knew that Jing Gong had been more than ten years before Xianke, how could Wen Gong not see "Distinguishing Adultery"[164] This can also be used as a proof that "The Theory of Distinguishing Adultery" was not written in the Jiayou period and even in the Yingzong and Shenzong dynasties.
As recorded in "Bo Zhai Edition" and "Shaw Brothers Wenjianlu", Su Xun first met Wang Anshi, and immediately concluded that he was a "great traitor", and wrote an article to attack him, which naturally caused people to be suspicious. For this reason, everyone is looking for the reason. For example, there are clouds on the roll of Ye Mengde's "Summer Retreat":
(Su Xun) Jiayou first came to Beijing and pushed his article for a while. Wang Jinggong is a knowledgeable system, and he talks about scriptures, but he does not praise it, and repeatedly slanders the public, so it is clear that Jing Gong is more evil than hatred. Hui Zhang Andao is also arranged by Jing Gong, the two are good, and Ming Yun wrote an article of "Identifying Adultery", which is secretly dedicated to Andao. [165]
However, Ye Mengde's cloud probably also came from rumors, and added his own speculation: for example, Wang Anshi was in June of the sixth year of Jiayou,[166] and "Zhang Andao was also arranged by Jing Gong", according to Fang Lao's "Bo Zhai Edition", "Wang Jing Gong was in charge of the country, and wanted to chase Zhang Fangping" Yunyun,[167] when he was in Xining. And his remark "Ming Yun wrote an article on "Distinguishing Adultery" and secretly offering Andao" is to echo the following words ""Distinguishing Adultery" has not been published for a long time".
Another example is Gong Yizheng's "Mustard Hidden Notes" cloud:
Jing Gong sat in Ou Gong, and sent Pei Ru to know Wujiang with rhyme, and rhymed with "Gloomy soul, only farewell". Shike and Gong are eight people, Jing Gong, Zimei, Shengyu, Pingfu, Lao Su, Yao Zizhang, and Jiao Boqiang. When the old Su De" and" the word "talk about poetry". Jing Gongnai also made two poems of "and": "Picking whales to resist waves, and the wind to make scales." Cover with "Zhou Li: Examination of the Work Record": "Ziren is deep in its claws, out of its eyes, and as its scales." (Original note: Cheeks and jaws too.) Another cloud: "The spring breeze is hanging in the rainbow pavilion, and a cup is held on the lake." Proud guests, two selfless and selfless. "The most workmanlike. The gentleman doesn't want to have more masters, and the regret of the king and Su may not be indifferent to this. [168]
According to this, Su Xun arrived in Beijing in May and June of the first year of Jiayou, and Pei Yu (the word is obscure) came out of Wujiang County in mid-October. [169] When Wang Anshi was in Beijing as a herd judge, Wang and Su first met in the same year.
In the Song Dynasty, it was the norm for scholars and scholars to write poems in rhyme at the banquet at that time, and it was about the same year that everyone tasted the poem "Tiger Picture" on the banquet, "or Wang Jiefu, Ouyang Yongshu, Mei Shengyu and a moment of hearing people, sitting on the topic of the Tiger Picture." Jiefu is the first, the public is convinced, and Uncle Yong is a sleeve". [170] It is so elegant that it is allowed to be a good story in the literary world. Fang Jian also verified that in the first year of Jiayou, Wang Anshi and Su Xun participated in at least two other gatherings at the same time: one was a singing remuneration with the theme of the white rabbit in Ouyang Xiu's house, and the participants were Mei Yaochen, Liu Chang, Liu Chu, Han Wei, and seven people in addition to Ouyang, Wang, and Su; In the first year of Jiayou when Su Xun first arrived in Bianjing, he and Wang Anshi had at least three experiences of traveling in such a banquet and singing activities, "If you have a grudge when you first know each other, it is impossible to have a relationship again and again." In the circle of literati in the officialdom society of Bianjing, the two can be called frequent customers, and it is unimaginable that they will have a bad relationship because of poetry." [171] Indeed, at the poetry meeting to bid farewell to Li Dalin, according to Su Song's poem "Sending Li Caiyuan to Bachelor Shoulin Qiong" with the sentence "The year is miserable, and the heart of the service is happy", it is inferred that the banquet was at the end of the year. [172] In addition, Fang Jian also tasted the poem "Narrative" in Su Xun Jiayou's fourth year of "Ziyou", which has a cloud: "To be born and harmless to things." Living in the countryside for a long time, he is suitable for all directions, and he is far away from his injustice with his gentleman. is one in fifty years, and there is no one who is especially good at the beginning, and no one is especially good at me", thinking that Su Xun should not meet Wang Anshi for the first time, that is, because of the poetry and elegant collection, he was unhappy and even resentful, and even wrote "The Theory of Distinguishing Adultery" to stab him. And in the eighth year of Jiayou, Wuzhong returned to Zhitan Prefecture, Wang Anshi, Su Xun and others all had poems to see off, which seems to show that Wang and Su have not broken off their friendship at this time. [173]
Obviously, it is still quite unreasonable to say that Su Xun wrote "On Distinguishing Adultery" in the first year of Jiayou, when he and Wang Anshi first met, for this reason, Zhu Xi put forward another explanation for Su Xun's motive for writing "On Distinguishing Adultery", saying:
Lao Su's "Identifying Adultery", at the beginning, he just had his own intentions, but later Jing Gong couldn't do it, so he said. However, Jing Gong is accustomed to being a corpse, leaving the world, and eating things without knowing hunger. Try to memorize a book, carry it in the food, never have any hobbies, but those who are near will be exhausted. Left and right suspect that it is good, and it is easy to use other things tomorrow, and if you put this product far away, you will not eat it. Often in the food does not taste the taste also. ...... In modern times, Lu Bogong is the same, his face is dirty, he seems to be untouched, and he doesn't know how much to eat. If you want it, you can rest assured. "Identifying Adultery" is a traitor with this, I'm afraid it would be otherwise. Lao Su was very respectful at the time, but Jing Gong didn't think so, so his father and son both cut their teeth. [174]
However, what Zhu Xi said was obviously because he saw that the time and motive of Su Xun's writing "On Distinguishing Adultery" that were rumored by the world were unreasonable, but his words, "Old Su's "Distinguishing Adultery", at first it was just a private intention, and later Jing Gong couldn't do it, so he said", it still seems to be otherwise. Zhu Ben, who was slightly earlier than Zhu Xi, recorded in "Qu Wei Old News":
Wang Jinggong is simple and straightforward, does not groom and serve, his clothes are dirty, his diet is evil, and he has no choice, which is true since he was a child. Su Mingyun wrote "Distinguishing Adultery", and his words were the clothes of the courtiers, the food of the dogs, and the mourning of the prisoners and talked about poetry and books. Ran Shaoxi traveled with Lu Huimu and Han Xiansu brothers. When the museum is employed, Yu Ru often takes a bath with the monk temple, and prepares a new dress, changing his clothes, and bathing out, so that his servants can raise the clothes and not to tell them, and Jing Gongfu is as inherent, and does not think it is different at the beginning. And for the ruler, or said that he liked to eat roe deer, his wife was suspicious when she heard this, and said: "On the fair day, there is no choice of food, why should you be only fond of it?" Because the order asked the deacons on the left and right, he said: "Why do you know the public's love for roe deer?" He asked, "When eating, where do you put the roe deer?" and said, "At the place near the dagger." The lady said: "Tomorrow, I will be close to the dagger." "Since the fruit eats all other things, and the roe deer is fixed, and later generations know that it is eaten by its proximity, and it is not a hobby at first. People see it too much, or they doubt its hypocrisy. [175]
It can be seen that Zhu Xi's so-called "taste and remember a book" seems to refer to Zhu Ben's book. However, Zhu Xi's statement is rarely echoed by the world. At the end of the Song Dynasty, Zhou Mi pointed out against Zhu Xi's statement:
Su Mingyun's "Distinguishing Adultery", I saw that Mr. Zhizhai Chen said that although this was Jiefufa, it was also similar to Ercheng, so later Zhu Han'an tried his best to protect Yun: "Lao Su's "Distinguishing Adultery" was just a private intention at the beginning, and then Jing Gong couldn't do it, so he said it. However, Jing Gong is accustomed to the scale of the body and the world, and it is reassuring to know this. "Identifying Adultery" is a traitor, but I am afraid it will not. ”[176]
Zhou Miyun Yunyun, but later generations have quite a lot of people. For example, in 1961, Zhang Jiaju wrote an article pointing out that in the context of fierce party disputes in the late Northern Song Dynasty, Shao Bowen, who belonged to the Luo Party, "also used sentences such as 'summoning people with good names' and 'thinking that Yan Yuan and Meng Ke were coming back' in the article "On Distinguishing Adultery" and other sentences, pretending to be Su's tone to allude to Ercheng", and he "not only forged a "Theory of Distinguishing Adultery", but also forged Su Shi's "Xie Zhang Fangping's Book", as a false evidence for Su Xun's "On Distinguishing Adultery". It shows that the reason why he attacked Wang Anshi under the pretense of a name is that he wants to borrow the name of this literati, and more importantly, it contains the meaning of slandering the Su family and his son." [177] Qiyun's "Theory of Distinguishing Adultery" "alludes to Ercheng", which seems to be derived from Yunyun in "Haoran Zhaiya Talk", but then thinks that Shao Bowen pseudo-Tuo Suxun's "Theory of Distinguishing Adultery" "Although he wants to borrow the name of this literati, and more importantly, it contains the meaning of slandering Su's father and son", but it has never been said before. After that, Wu Mengfu and Zhan Yayuan also believed that "The Theory of Distinguishing Adultery" does not seem to be specifically aimed at Wang Anshi, "If it is aimed at Northern Song Dynasty physicists, it seems to be more comfortable." [178] According to the above statements, most of them are based on speculation and cannot be trusted.
In addition, Liu Shaoquan's "Annals of Su Laoquan" [179] dates the "Theory of Distinguishing Adultery" to the fifth year of Jiayou, when "Wang Anshi's reputation began to flourish, and Ouyang Xiu advised Su Xun to travel with him, and Xun said: 'Those who are not close to people are rarely troubled by the world. It is the Treatise on Adultery." According to this, Liu Shaoquan's statement obviously lacks basis, and it is necessary to attach to the saying that "party friends are pouring out for a while." Therefore, Zeng Zaozhuang tried to write an article criticizing this. [180]
Although Su Xun claimed to be over half a hundred years old and had never had a grudge against anyone, because of the article "On Distinguishing Adultery", there are many records of Wang Anshi and Su Xun's interactions and even evil relations in Song literature. As quoted above, Zhang Fangping's "Tomb Table", Fang Lao's "Bo Zhai Edition", and Shao Bowen's "Shaw Brothers' Wenjian Record" do not directly record that Su Xun tasted and Wang Anshi had a bad relationship, but said that when the two first met in the first year of Jiayou, Su Xun "I know that he is a person, he is not close to people, and he is rarely troubled by the world", but "Tomb Table" said that although the two first met in Jiayou, Su Xun's "Theory of Distinguishing Adultery" was written at the time of the death of Wang Anshi's mother at the end of Jiayou. As for Gong Yizheng's "Notes on Mustard Concealment", it is inferred that Wang and Su were at odds with each other because of the banquet poems; Ye Mengde's "Summer Retreat" said that Su Xun "was a good soldier, but when he saw that Yuan Hao rebelled against the West, he used his troops for a long time without success, and the world should be changed. Wang Jinggong is a knowledgeable system, and he talks about scriptures, but he does not praise it, and he repeatedly slanders the public, so it is clear that he is more evil than he is hateful." [181] Although the statements vary, most of them are based on speculation.
As for the reason why Su Xun concluded that Wang Anshi was "treacherous" when he first met him, and predicted that he would "suffer for the world" in a few years, Zeng Zaozhuang believed that before the first year of Jiayou, "due to differences of opinion and the influence of friends, Su Xun formed a bad opinion of Wang Anshi", and his "Heng Lun" and "Book of Quan" and so on "seem to be specially aimed at Wang Anshi", and the "roundabout" theory of "people from the world" restoring Jingtian criticized in his "Tian System" undoubtedly includes Wang Anshi, who advocated the restoration of the Jingtian system. Therefore, according to Zhang Fangping's "Tomb Table" and Fang Lao's "Bo Zhai Edition", Zeng Wen said that when Wang and Su first met, they "despised and slandered each other". The contradiction between Wang and Su is so "deep", it is by no means "caused by poetry alone", but is inseparable from the "difference in political and academic opinions" between the two: the main reason is that Su Xun "is a good soldier", and his "Theory of Machine" and "Heng Ce" are very beautiful, but most of them are about the change of military power",[182] while Wang Anshi "talked about scriptures", so he "did not praise Su Xun". In the third year of Yu Jiayou, both of them tried to write to Song Renzong about the rule of law, but their views were opposite. In the sixth year of Jiayou, Su Shi should make the "Advance Strategy" written by the scientific examination, which refutes Wang Anshi's arguments, so Wang Anshi has Su Shi's policy essay "All kinds of Warring States articles, if Anshi is the examiner, he must be deposed", and then wrote the words of implicit lessons in the writing of Su Shi's Dali commentary, and was unwilling to write the words of Su Zhe's Shangzhou military promotion system, that is, Wang Anshi believed that Su Zhe's policy was intended to be "the right prime minister, specializing in the master, compared to Gu Yong, and refused to write words". Zeng Wen also said that Su Zhe "had no choice but to ask to serve his father at home, but he was unable to go to work". Therefore, as the contradiction sharpened, Wang Anshi's "prestige became higher and higher", and the scholar could not "distinguish between adultery", so Su Xun "finally had the impulse to write "On Distinguishing Adultery". [183] In response to Zeng's argument, Xu Wenming published an article entitled "The Similarities and Differences between Su Xun and Wang Anshi's Thoughts", citing a large number of materials to prove the similarities between Su Xun and Wang Anshi's thoughts, pointing out that the two "basic positions and political propositions are very similar, and the basis for the establishment of the "Theory of Distinguishing Adultery" cannot be established by fabricating the conflict between Su and Wang's thoughts", and said that "in order to attack Wang Anshi and the reform movement, in order to explain the "Theory of Distinguishing Adultery" is true, Su Xun is always deliberately dressed as the spokesperson of conservatives by later generations, which is far from the real Su Xun." [184]
Indeed, the Song people also had the saying that the "Theory of Distinguishing Adultery" was "Su's regretful words"[185], but Zeng Wen did not distinguish the inaccuracy of their records in order to prove some of the historical materials of Su Xun and Wang Anshi's evil, and there were places where they were played at will, so there were many disagreements about the political opinions of Su and Wang Yu before the first year of Jiayou, and the contradiction became more and more acute since then, and the theory of "Distinguishing Adultery" is indeed quite far-fetched.
As to whether the "Treatise on Distinguishing Adultery" was known and disseminated by others after it was written, what is the attitude of the people towards this article, and what is its impact on the relationship between Su and Wang, the books are also quite similar and different.
First, Zhang Fangping's "Tomb Table" and "Theory of Distinguishing Treachery" were completed, "At that time, there were many people who saw it, and it was said that 'hee is very serious'." [186] And Su Shi's "Book of Thanks" is said to be "Fu Meng shows the tomb table of the ancestors again, and specially contains an article "Distinguishing Adultery". ...... the beginning of "Identifying Adultery", Zishi and his younger brother both have the advice of 'hee and his brother', regardless of others, Du Minggong saw it and thought it was in line with me. The public has been discussed in the annals of history. Although there is no knowledge of today, it will not be indispensable for future generations." [187] In this way, when the "Theory of Discerning Adultery" was written, it was already circulated, so there is a saying that "it is not true that there were many people who saw it at that time". Shao Bowen's "Shaw Brothers Hearing and Seeing Records" is also known as "Si Wen, many commentators think otherwise, although his two sons, there is also a sigh of 'hee and very much'", which is obviously quoted from the "Book of Thanks". But Shaw Brothers again:
Lu Xianke Zhongcheng visited the governor of Jing Gong at the beginning of Xining, and said that he was treacherous, and every time he pointed at Jing Gong, he said: "Those who disturb the world will also be this person." ”...... Gong Wen said abruptly: "Lu Xianke's foresight is too late. "If Mr. Mingyun knew that Jing Gong had been more than ten years before the dedication, how could Gong Wen not see "Argument for Adultery"? [188]
Indeed, except for Su Shi's "Book of Thanks", no one seems to know that there is also this "Theory of Distinguishing Adultery" or "Tomb Table" in the late Northern Song Dynasty. So Ye Mengde said in "Summer Retreat" that at that time, "Ming Yun wrote an article of "Identifying Adultery", and secretly dedicated An Dao. Jing Gong is compared to Wang Yan and Lu Qi, not to show Ou Wenzhong. After Jing Gonghou heard about it, because he was not happy with his brothers, the gap between the two families was insoluble. "Identifying Adultery" has not been out for a long time, Yuanfeng, Ziyou from Andao to Nanjing, please be Mingyun's tomb table, especially full of it. The Su family is also not in the stone, and it has been passed down to the world when it is younger." [189] In this way, the world did not know that until the late Northern Song Dynasty, there were two articles: "On Distinguishing Adultery" and "Tomb Table". However, this statement is different from Shao Bo's "Shaw Brothers Hearing and Seeing the Later Record":
Dongpo Zhongzhi Department, Wang Jinggong asked Lu Shengong if he saw Su Shi's policy, and Shen Gong called it. Jing Gong said: "All kinds of Warring States articles, if Anshi is the examiner, he will be deposed." Therefore, Jing Gong later revised the "Yingzong Record", saying that Su Mingyun had the learning cloud of the Warring States Period.
Shao Bo Youyun:
"Yingzong Record": "Su Xun died, and his son Shi Ci gave him a silver silk, and asked for a gift, so he gave Xun Guanglu Temple." It is different from Ouyang Gongzhi's "Zhi" "The Son of Heaven mourns when he hears it, and gives it to Guanglu Temple". Or Yun "Actual Record", Wang Jinggongshu also. Another book, "Xun's "Theory of Machines" and "Heng Ce" are very beautiful, but they are also about the words of the military to seek power and machine changes." When Ming Yun was covered, Jing Gong's name was already prosperous, and Ming Yun did not take it, so he made "Identifying Adultery" to stab him, so Jing Gong was not happy. [190]
Shao Bogai took his father's so-called "Theory of Distinguishing Adultery" as written in the early years of Jiayou, so Wang Anshi was "unhappy" with Su Xun's "Theory of Distinguishing Adultery", so he did not take Su Shi's strategy, and belittled Su Xun's learning as "the study of the Warring States Period" in the "Records of Yingzong". However, according to the above analysis, the theory that "The Theory of Distinguishing Adultery" was written in the first year of Jiayou is not valid, so the so-called Wang Anshi was "unhappy" because he heard that Su Xun had written "The Theory of Distinguishing Adultery", and the Su father and son were not happy because they heard that Su Xun had written "The Theory of Distinguishing Adultery".
Because Wang Anshi lived in Jinling in the eighth year of Jiayou's mother's worries, he was used as a bachelor of Hanlin in the fourth year of Zhiping, and participated in the governor's affairs in February of the second year of Xining. Su Xun died in the third year of Zhiping, and the Su Shi brothers returned to Shu with the help of the coffin, and arrived in Bianjing in early February of the second year of Xining. In mid-February, Su Shi sued the court as a judge of the palace and the Zhishi Museum, and concurrently judged the ancestral hall of Shangshu; in mid-March, Su Zhe inspected the detailed text for the preparation of the regulations of the three divisions. [191] At that time, "Wang Anshi was in power and Chen Shengzhi led the three divisions, and the fate was to belong to it". [192] "History of the Song Dynasty and Career Officials" cloud: "The three divisions of the regulations were established, the scriptures were drawn and the state plan was drawn, and the old law was changed to benefit the world." In the second year of Xining, Chen Shengzhi of the Privy Council and Wang Anshi, the governor of the Privy Council, and Su Zhe and Cheng Hao were also subordinate officials. [193] Su Zhe appointed this official as the official of the Daimyo Mansion, Ding Wei, who was "dismissed", which was obviously reused. And "History of the Song Dynasty: The Biography of Su Shi" said that Su Shi "returned to the dynasty in the second year of Xining, Wang Anshi was in power, and he hated his dissidents, and sued the court with a judge." In four years, Anshi wanted to change the imperial examination, build the school, and discuss the two systems and three halls, and discuss the discussion. ...... An Shi is displeased, and the power of Kaifeng Mansion is the official of the Kaifeng Prefecture, and he will be trapped in trouble." [194] According to "The History of the Song Dynasty: The Biography of Su Shi", it is derived from Su Zhe's "Epitaph of the Dead Brother Zhan Duanming":
(Su Shi) was served, and Shi Xining was also in the second year. Wang Jiefu used things and established many institutes. The public and Jiefu discussed the differences, and both returned to the court, and the official of the court sued the court. In four years, Jiefu wanted to change the imperial examination, but he was suspicious, so that the two systems and three halls discussed it. The public discussion ,...... Jiefu's party was displeased, and ordered Kaifeng to push the official, intending to be troubled. [195]
Later scholars sometimes said that Wang Anshi was "unhappy with his brothers" because of the "Theory of Distinguishing Adultery", so he reprimanded and snubbed him. However, according to the "History of the Song Dynasty and the Chronicles of Vocational Officials", the official told the court that "in the old system, one person was promoted to be filled with knowledge, and one person was sentenced to the court to lead the official charge of the Beijing Dynasty". [196] According to the first month of the sixth year of Jiayou, "the edict sentenced the Shangshu to test the merits, the ancestral hall, and the official court, and from now on, and the people who are sent to the capital will be combined, and they will still be given an additional 10,000." The story, Shangshu Province Zhu Cao, but the sentence, the Ministry of South Cao Xu Li order, Yu Yu Youque, that is, Shen Zhongshu, the book was sentenced to a certain official, which was said to be sent to print. When the hall excludes the senders, and the three Cao have something to do, so they are sent to the court." [197] It can be seen that the Guanzhu Yuan is also an important ministry institution of the imperial court, and Su Shi's official palace Zhongcheng and Zhishi Museum at this time are the "officials of the Beijing Dynasty", so Su Shi's judgment of the Guanzhu Yuan can also be called reused to a certain extent. As for the appointment of Su Shi as the official of Kaifeng Prefecture, the cause has nothing to do with the "Theory of Distinguishing Adultery", and the official of Kaifeng Prefecture is also an important official. In the second year of Yuanfeng, when Su Shi fell into the "Wutai Poetry Case", "the old legend of Yuanfeng was that the imperial court spoke in groups, and the temple cherished its talents and could not bear to kill." Prime Minister Wang Wengong said: "How can there be a saint in the world and kill talented people!" [198] Although there are doubts about the validity of Wang Anshi's words, it can be seen that the Song people believed that Wang Anshi tried to speak out to save Su Shi who was in crisis. [199] In the seventh year of Yuanfeng, Wang Anshi and Su Shi met in Jinling, stayed and sang and harmonized, "reciting poems and talking about Buddha", "talking about ancient texts", and they were very happy. However, this kind of interaction is biased towards the nature of entertainment, and it is far from eliminating the serious political differences between the two. [200] However, such an exchange seems to prove that Wang Anshi's theory that "he is not happy to see his brothers, and the gap between the two families is insoluble" cannot be established because of his "slight news" and "Discerning Adultery".
In addition, the above quotation of Shao Bo's "Records of the Shaw Brothers after hearing and seeing" also said that because of Su Xun's "Theory of Distinguishing Adultery", Wang Anshi was "unhappy", so in the "Yingzong Record", "it is said that Su Mingyun has the study of the Warring States Period"; Therefore, some people use this to confirm that Wang and Su "the gap between the two families is insoluble". There are three things that need to be analyzed here: first, whether the text involving Su Xun in the "Yingzong Records" was written by Wang Anshi; second, whether it is fair to comment on Su Xun's "Warring States Periodical Studies"; and third, whether it is true that "Su Xun was a pawn, and his son Shi Ci gave a silver silk to ask for an official, so he gave Xun Guanglu Temple" is true.
Regarding the "Records of Yingzong", according to the "History of the Song Dynasty and the Records of Shenzong", in the first month of the first year of Xining, "Ding You, edicted to revise the "Records of Yingzong"; in February of the second year, "Gengzi, with Wang Anshi, participated in political affairs, and ordered Lu Gong, a scholar of Hanlin, to revise the "Records of Yingzong"; and in July, "Ji Chou, Han Qi went to the "Records of Renzong", and Zeng Gongliang went to the "Records of Yingzong". [201] Chao Gongwu's "Junzhai Reading Chronicles" contains Zeng Gongliang et al.'s "Yingzong Shilu" in 30 volumes, cloud: "In the first month of the first year of Xining, Zhao Gongliang raised it, wrote by Lu Gong, Han Weiwei, and reviewed by Sun Jue and Zeng Gong. In March, it was reviewed again. In April, it was revised by Wang Anshi and Wu Chong. In July of the second year, the book was completed. [202] Chen Zhensun's "Zhizhai Shulu Solution" said that the "Yingzong Shilu" was "written by the scholar Shouchun Lu Gong, the uncle of the Changshe Han Zhiguo, and the knowledge system of the city of Hepu Wu Chongchongqing". [203] In addition to the above-mentioned Zeng Gongliang's citation, Lü Gongshu, Han Wei, Wang Anshi, and Wu Chongwei's revision, and Sun Jue, Zeng Gong, and Qian Zao's review, Jia An, [204] Wang Qi, etc., who participated in the compilation of the Yingzong Records. [205] Regarding the compilation process of the "Yingzong Records", Wang Mingqing tried to record the cloud according to the "Ancestors' Notes": "The "Yingzong Records", in the first year of Xining, was promoted by Xuanjing, and Wang Jinggong had entered the Hanlin Dynasty. Mr. Dongpo said to Liu Zhuangyu Xi Zhongyun: "This book is concise and prepared, ancient and clear, and it is the crown of the history of the dynasty." [206] Shao Bo's "Records of the Shaw Brothers after Hearing and Seeing" or Yun "Shilu", Wang Jinggongshu also "" or "Yun", which probably refers to the "Waving Lulu". When Ran Ma came to the "General Examination of Literature and Classics" and quoted the "Wave Lu", he made "please" as "Xuanjing" in "please do it yourself", that is, "Xuanjing does it yourself". [207] According to Xuanjing, Xuanjing was Zeng Gongliang's name, and when he worshiped Zhao Wenxiang, he cited the "Yingzong Record", and the book was completed, and it was from him to the imperial court. In September of the fourth year of Zhiping, Wang Anshi was in addition to the bachelor of Hanlin, and arrived in Beijing at the end of March of the first year of Xining, and then he and Wu Chong went on to repair the "Yingzong Record". [208] However, at that time, Wang Anshi tasted Zazi begging: "The minister is allowed to report to the door, and the minister and Wu Chong are the same cultivators of the "Records of Emperor Yingzong". The thief is subordinate to Wu Chong, and he is worried about working together. Today, the Record Institute has stopped Que Lu Gong and is a person, and he is subordinate to the discussion and embellishment, which is not as precise as Wu Chong, and if Wu Chong is sent to act on behalf of the public, he will be self-sufficient. Looking at the grace of God, he carefully commanded, and all the edicts did not dare to be accepted. [209] Shi Lu Gong wrote from the Hanlin Bachelor's Quan Zhi Kaifeng Mansion, so Wang Anshi had the words "The Actual Record Academy stopped Que Lu Gong and wrote one person". Because of the resignation and did not agree, so the history records Wang Anshi "in Hanlin, and also repaired the record, one day, with a poem to record the courtyard wall cloud,...... After a few days, he participated in the governor's affairs",[210] in February of the second year of Xining. Wang Anshi was in power, and then ordered Lu Gong, a scholar of Hanlin, to revise the "Records of Yingzong". By July, the "Record" was completed. Therefore, it is not accurate to regard the article cited above as "Xuanjing was promoted in the first year of Xining, and Wang Jinggong had already entered the Hanlin Dynasty, please do it yourself, and the actual record was revised, and the thirty volumes were written without official affiliation, out of one hand", and it is not accurate to regard the thirty volumes of the "Yingzong Actual Records" as Wang Anshi's "one-handed" work, and Wang Anshi only revised it by the Shilu Academy, and he did not have the power to decide on his own "not to set aside the official subordinates", so the statement that "Xuanjing did it himself" seems to be inappropriate and simply denied. Moreover, in view of the difference between the incident of Su Xun contained in the "Records of Yingzong" and the words "the Son of Heaven heard and mourned it, and gave it to Guanglu Temple" in Ouyang Xiu's "Epitaph", it claimed that "or the cloud "Record", Wang Jinggongshu also", and covered the suspicious words; as for the "Actual Record", it is also written that "Xun's "Theory of Machines" and "Heng Ce" are very beautiful, but it is also about the words of the military to seek power and machine changes", then the words are convincingly claiming, "When Ming Yun was covered, Jing Gong's name was already prosperous, and Ming Yun did not take it, and he made "Identifying Adultery" to stab him, so Jing Gong was not happy , and in another account, it is clearly stated that "Therefore, Jing Gong later revised the "Yingzong Shilu", saying that Su Mingyun had the learning cloud of the Warring States Period",[211] and confirmed it. "Taiping Zhizhi Traces" Volume 25 quoted "Ding Weilu" Yun Suxun "came to visit the Beijing Division, Hanlin Ouyang Xiu saw it and praised it at first sight, and wrote it in the court. When Wang Anshi was famous, the party was leaning for a while, and the cultivation was also good, persuading Xun and An Shi to travel, and An Shi was also willing to hand over to Xun. Xun said: 'I know that he is not close to people, and he is rarely troubled by the world. 'Write "The Doctrine of Adultery" to stab it. The text is out, and An Shi is the first to be called. As a result, An Shi asked Lu Gong to write: 'Do you see Su Shi's policy?' Gong is famous, and An Shi said: "All kinds of Warring States articles, if An Shi is the examiner, he will be deposed." Therefore, An Shixiu's "Yingzong Shilu" also said that Xun had the study of the Warring States Period"Yunyun,[212] which was copied from the "Shaw Brothers Wenjianlu" and "Later Record". It can be seen that the world thinks that the Su Xun text in the "Yingzong Record" is written by Wang Anshi, which still lacks historical evidence and is mostly speculative.
Regarding the "Yingzong Record" "Xun has the study of the Warring States Period" Yunyun, it also belongs to the general view of Su Xun's learning at that time. For example, Yang Shi "said because of Su Mingyun's "Book of Quan" and "Heng Lun": 'Looking at the name of his book, how can there be mountains and forests and people who stand up for the world, but draw from the use of soldiers? [213] It is also known as "Daoshan Qinghua":
When Lao Su first came out of Shu, he saw all the nobles with military books, but he didn't understand it very much. Later, someone said that his name was Yu Fu Han Gong, and the public said: "This monarch exhorts people to kill in order to establish his authority, how can he be so worthy of an official position!" [214]
And Ye Mengde also tasted the clouds:
Su Mingyun was a good soldier, seeing Yuan Hao's rebellion, the West had used troops for a long time without success, and the world should be changed. ...... Han Wei Gongzhi and Zhonghuan Dynasty as privy envoys, when the military and political affairs were relaxed for a long time, the soldiers were arrogant and lazy, and they wanted to be slightly restricted, fearing that their grievances would change, and Fang Yin tried to do it. It will be clear that it will come from Shu, but it is to explore the public will, and it will be a book, showing what it says, and claiming that the public will be beheaded first. The public was shocked, Xie didn't dare to say goodbye, and blamed Ou Wenzhong slightly, and Fu Zheng Gong was not happy when he was in charge, so Ming Yun returned without success for a long time. [215]
It can be seen that Shao Bo regarded the phrase "Xun has the study of the Warring States Period" as Wang Anshi's resentful words, and it should also be his speculation.
Regarding the "Yingzong Shilu" contained in the "Yingzong Shilu" "Su Xun pawn, his son Shi Ci gave the silver silk, asked for a gift to the official, so he gave Xun Guanglu Temple Cheng" Yunyun, also recorded in the "Long Edition" volume 208, [216] Song "National History: The Biography of Lao Su Ben", [217] "Song History: Su Xun Biography" [218] and "Song Hui to Compile Manuscripts and Elections" 34-39, etc., should be true records. And Ouyang Xiu's "Epitaph of Su Jun in the Main Book of Wen'an County, Bazhou", "The Son of Heaven mourns when he hears it, and gives it to Guanglu Temple" is just a common ornament when the ancients wrote epitaphs on tablets, so Shao Bo Yunyun is really subtle.
Therefore, although the matter of Su Xun mentioned in the "Yingzong Record" was regarded by later generations such as Shao Bo as Wang Anshi's attack and jealousy of Su Xun, but after checking other documents at the time, it can be seen that it is only a true record, and in view of the fact that the 30 volumes of the "Yingzong Record" are "out of the hand" and have quite high academic value, Su Shi also praised at that time that "this book is concise and well-prepared, ancient and clear, and is the crown of the history of the national dynasty".
Notes
[1] (Ming) Wang Shizhen, "After Reading", vol. 4, "Shu Lao Su Wenhou", photocopy of Wenyuan Ge Siku Quanshu, vol. 1285, p. 48.
[2] (Qing) Li Fu, "The First Draft of Mu Tang and the Second Two Rules of the Book of Distinguishing Treachery", quoted from (Qing) Cai Shangxiang, Pei Rucheng Dianxiao: Wang Jinggong's Annals Examination and Strategy, vol. 10, Zhonghua Book Company, 1994, Wang Anshi's Three Kinds of Annals, pp. 376-379.
[3] The Annals of Wang Jinggong, vol. 10, pp. 363-376.
[4] Zhang Peiheng, "<辨奸论>Non-Shao Bowen Forgeries: On the Relevant Issues in the Examination of Wang Jinggong's Annals", in Journal of Fudan University, Supplement to Classical Literature Essays, Shanghai People's Publishing House, 1980, later included in the book: "Collection of Doubts", Yuelu Academy, 1993 edition, slightly revised text, and attached to the article "The Relationship between Zhang Fangping and Ouyang Xiu, Han Qi and Sima Guang", and also included in the article: "Bujing Buhai Collection", Fudan University Press, 2012. Deng Guangming, "<辨奸论>Re-examination and Re-judgment of the Question of Authenticity and Falsity", in Studies of Chinese Studies, Vol. 3, Peking University Press, 1995, and later included in Deng Guangming's Complete Works, Vol. 9, Hebei Education Press, 2005. Wang Shuizhao, "The <辨奸论>Dispute over Authenticity", Xinmin Evening News, February 15, 1997; Deng Guangming, "Re-Discussion on 'Distinguishing Adultery' Not Written by Su Xun -- A Reply to Professor Wang Shuizhao", in Academic Collections, Vol. 13, Shanghai Far East Publishing House, 1998; At the time of the publication of this paper, Mr. Tang Guangming had passed away. Wang Shuizhao, "On the <辨奸论>Controversy of Authenticity Again: Reading Mr. Deng Guangming< Re-Discussing the Theory of Distinguishing Adultery, > Not Written by Su Xun", in Academic Collection, Vol. 15, Shanghai Far East Publishing House, 1999;
[5] (Song) Ouyang Xiu, Li Yi'an, "Ouyang Xiu's Complete Works", vol. 35, "The Epitaph of Su Jun in the Main Book of Wen'an County, Ancient Bazhou", Zhonghua Book Company, 2001 edition, p. 513.
[6] (Song) Zeng Gong, Chen Xingzhen, Chao Ji Zhou Dianxiao: Zeng Gongji, vol. 41, Su Mingyun's Lamentation, Zhonghua Book Company, 1984, p. 561.
[7] (Song) Su Xun, "The History of the People's Republic of China: The Biography of Lao Su Ben" quoted in the appendix volume of the Jiayou Collection, photocopied by the Commercial Press of Taipei, Wenyuan Ge Siku Quanshu, vol. 1104, p. 978.
[8] (Song) Wang said, "The Story of the Eastern Capital", vol. 114, "The Biography of Su Xun", photocopy of Wenyuan Pavilion Siku Quanshu, vol. 382, p. 745, by the Commercial Press, Taipei.
[9] (Yuan) Totokh et al., History of the Song Dynasty, vol. 443, "The Biography of Su Xun", Zhonghua Book Company, 1985, p. 13097.
[10] (Song) Chao Gongwu, Sun Meng, "Junzhai Reading Zhi School Certificate", Vol. 19, Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House, 1990, p. 996.
[11] (Song) Chen Zhensun, Xu Xiaoman, Gu Meihua Dianxiao, Zhizhai Shulu Problem Solving, Vol. 17, Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House, 1987, p. 502.
[12] History of the Song Dynasty, vol. 208, Yiwen Zhi VII, p. 5365.
[13] (Song) Zheng Qiao, "Tongzhi", vol. 70, "Yiwenluo", photocopy of Wenyuan Ge Siku Quanshu, vol. 374, p. 398, by the Commercial Press, Taipei. According to the report, "30 volumes" is suspected to be divided into 15 volumes, one volume is two, or "30 volumes" is "20 volumes".
[14] See Zhu Shangshu, "Narrative of the Song People's Collection", vol. 5, Jiayou Ji, Zhonghua Book Company, 1999 edition, p. 215.
[15] (Qing) Yongying et al., Siku Quanshu Zongmu, vol. 153, Zhonghua Book Company, 1965, pp. 1324-1325.
[16] Wang Jinggong's Annals of the Chronicles, vol. 10, pp. 378-379. Wu Xiaoru, "On the <辨奸论>Question of Authenticity" agrees with this statement, Wen Wei Po, March 28, 1957, and "Reading the Common Book Journal", Zhonghua Book Company, 1958, p. 133.
[17] Zhou Benchun, "'The Theory of Distinguishing Adultery' Is Not a Forgery", Journal of Nanjing University, No. 1, 1979;
[18] Zhang Peiheng, "<辨奸论>Non-Shao Bowen Forgeries: Also on the Relevant Issues in the Annals of Wang Jinggong", in Bujing Buhai Ji, pp. 38-39.
[19] Deng Guangming, "The <辨奸论>Re-examination and Re-judgment of the Question of Authenticity and Falsity", in Studies in Sinology, Vol. 3, Peking University Press, 1995, p.436.
[20] Pei Rucheng, "Su Xun's Collected Works<辨奸论>", Zaishi, Bansu Collection, Hebei University Press, 2000, p. 164.
[21] Zeng Zaozhuang, "The <辨奸论>Examination of Authenticity and Falsity", Journal of Sichuan University, Series of Classical Literature, Vol. 15, Sichuan University Press, 1982. Press, after a slight revision, included in the book: "Sansu Studies: Zeng Zaozhuang Wencun No. 1", Bashu Publishing House, 1999 edition, pp. 124-126.
[22] Deng Guangming, "The <辨奸论>Re-examination and Re-judgment of the Question of Authenticity and Falsity", Studies in Chinese Studies, vol. 3, pp. 435-436.
[23] Deng Guangming, "Re-Discussion on 'Distinguishing Adultery' Not Written by Su Xun -- A Reply to Professor Wang Shuizhao", in Academic Collection, vol. 13, p. 83.
[24] (Song) Ye Mengde, Xu Shiyi, "Summer Retreat", Vol. 1, Elephant Publishing House, 2006, Notes on the Song Dynasty (Part II), p. 247.
[25] (Song) Hu Zai, "Tiaoxi Yuyin Conghua", Later Collection Volume 27, Dongpo II, Shanghai Commercial Press, 1937, Wanyou Library, p. 617.
[26] Liu Shangrong, "A <类编老苏大全文集>Preliminary Study", Social Science Front, No. 1, 1983.
[27] (Qing) Qu Shi, "The Bibliography of the Song and Yuan Dynasty Books in the Collection of the Iron Qin and Bronze Sword Building", edited by Ding Youyuan and Jiang Shi of the Qing Dynasty, p. 5.
[28] Wang Shuizhao, "°The <辨奸论>Dispute of Authenticity"±, Xinmin Evening News, "Luminous Cup" supplement, February 15, 1997, and Wang Shuizhao's Selected Works, Shanghai Education Publishing House, 2000.
[29] Deng Guangming, "Re-Discussion on 'Distinguishing Adultery' Not Written by Su Xun -- A Reply to Professor Wang Shuizhao", in Academic Collection, vol. 13, Shanghai Far East Publishing House, 1998, pp. 84-86.
[30] Wang Shuizhao, "On the <辨奸论>Controversy of Authenticity Again: Reading Mr. Deng Guangming< Re-Discussing the > of Su Xun's Non-Su Xun", in Academic Collection, vol. 15, Shanghai Far East Publishing House, 1999, p.255.
[31] (Song) Wang Yinglin, (Qing) Yan Ruoxuan, He Zhuo, Quan Zu Wangzhu, Luan Baoqun, Tian Songqing, "Records of Sleepy Learning", vol. 17, "Commentary", Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House, 2015, p. 496.
[32] (Song) Yang Jie, "Wu Wei Ji", vol. 15 "Shangyan Dale Seven Things", photocopy of Wenyuan Ge Siku Quanshu, vol. 1099, p. 777.
[33] (Song) Chang Fangping, "The Complete Works of Music", vol. 39, "The Tomb of Mr. Wen'an", photocopy of Wenyuan Ge Siku Quanshu, Taipei Commercial Press, vol. 1104, p. 486.
[34] Wang Jinggong's Annals of the Chronicles, vol. 10, p. 377.
[35] Wang Jinggong's Annals of the Chronicles, vol. 10, p. 374.
[36] Li Qingyi, "°The <辨奸论>Question of Authenticity on the Trial"±, Guangming Daily, March 17, 1957, column "Literary Heritage".
[37] Zhou Benchun, "The Theory of Distinguishing Adultery Is Not a Forgery," in Notes on Reading Common Books, p. 13.
[38] Zhang Peiheng, "<辨奸论>Non-Shao Bowen Forgeries: Also on the Relevant Issues in the Annals of Wang Jinggong", in Bujing Buhai Ji, pp. 34-35.
[39] Liu Naichang, "The Interaction between Su Shi and Wang Anshi", Journal of Northeast Normal University, No. 3, 1981.
[40] Appendix to "The Complete Works of Music", Wang Gong, "Xingzhi", photocopy of Wenyuan Ge Siku Quanshu, Taipei Commercial Press, vol. 1104, p. 540.
[41] (Song) Su Shi, Zhang Zhilie, Ma Defu, Zhou Yukai (eds.), "Su Shi's Complete Works Proofreading", vol. 14, "Zhang Wending Cemetery Epitaph", Hebei People's Publishing House, 2010, p. 1496;
[42] "Junzhai Reading Chronicles School Certificate", Zhao Xiben: "Reading Supplementary Notes", vol. II, p. 1177.
[43] Zhizhai Shulu Solution, vol. 17, p. 497.
[44] History of the Song Dynasty, vol. 208, Yiwen Zhi VII, pp. 5354, 5367.
[45] "The Complete Works of Music", vol. 34, "Preface to the Complete Works of Xie Su Zizhan Jile", photocopy of Wenyuan Ge Siku Quanshu, vol. 1104, p. 381.
[46] "Proofnotes on the Complete Works of Su Shi", vol. 10, "The Collected Narratives of Mr. Lequan", pp. 972-973.
[47] "The Complete Works of Music", vol. 34, "Xie Liu Xin Lao Ji Yutang Collection Preface", photocopy of Wenyuan Ge Siku Quanshu, Taipei Commercial Press, vol. 1104, p. 380.
[48] Zeng Zaozhuang and Liu Lin, eds., The Complete Song Dynasty, vol. 1677, Liu Zhi, "Preface to the Yutang Collection", Shanghai Lexicographical Publishing House, Anhui Education Publishing House, 2006, vol. 77, p. 97.
[49] "Proofnotes on the Complete Works of Su Shi", vol. 14, "Epitaph on the Tomb of Zhang Wending", p. 1495.
[50] The Complete Song Dynasty, vol. 1677, Liu Zhi, Preface to the Yutang Collection, vol. 77, p. 97.
[51] Siku Quanshu General Catalogue, vol. 153, Le Quanji, p. 1324. According to the "Synopsis" before the book of "Siku Quanshu", "Zongfu" is "Zongge", yes; from "Kao Wang Gongzuo" to "Therefore the collection does not contain ears", and the "Summary" before the book is "Zhidang is in the "Yutang Collection", but now it is dead, and only this collection exists. In addition, Qu Qijia's collection: "Tieqin Bronze Sword Building Collection of Books and Inscriptions" Volume 4 records Zhang Fangping's "Mr. Le Quan's Anthology" 40 volumes, Yun "County Xi Chubai to Wang's collection of Song originals." The beginning of the seventeenth, the end of the thirty-four volumes, the engraving is clear, the words are strong and the paper is strong, and it is still the first printing of the best book. Twenty-four lines per leaf, twenty-two words in the line, the word "structure" is annotated with the word "Taishang Imperial Name", and the word "Shen" is annotated with the word "Jinshang Imperial Name", which is undoubtedly engraved for the early years of Chunxi. Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House, 2019, p. 233.
[52] See Zhang Guye and Li Qiushi, "Zheng Qiao's Citation<四库书目>", Library, No. 6, 2009.
[53] Summer Retreat, vol. 1, p. 247.
[54] "Proofnotes on the Complete Works of Su Shi", vol. 49, Xie Zhang Taibao wrote the book of the tombs of the ancestors, p. 5319.
[55] Wang Jinggong's Annals of the Chronicles, vol. 10, p. 378.
[56] The Annals of Wang Jinggong, vol. 10, p. 370.
[57] Zhizhai Shulu Solution, vol. 17, pp. 502-503.
[58] Zhang Peiheng, "<辨奸论>Non-Shao Bowen Forgeries: Also on the Relevant Issues in the Annals of Wang Jinggong", in Collection of Doubts, pp. 32-34.
[59] Deng Guangming, "The <辨奸论>Re-examination and Re-judgment of the Question of Authenticity and Falsity", Studies in Chinese Studies, vol. 3, p. 441.
[60] Wang Shuizhao, "The <辨奸论>Dispute over Authenticity", in Wang Shuizhao's Selected Works, p. 741. According to the National Library of the Southern Song Dynasty, the large-character edition of the Southern Song Dynasty Xiaozong "Dongpo Collection", with 18 characters and 30 volumes. The Imperial Household Agency's Sholing Department of the Southern Song Dynasty filial piety period of the Southern Song Dynasty has 37 volumes, 8 volumes of the Later Collection, and 18 characters, which should be "printed on the same carved plate" as the National Library. The Japanese Cabinet Library collects the Southern Song Dynasty filial piety period "Dongpo Collection", line two crosses, save 23 volumes, "there is a nine-year imperial preface in front of the main road", Fu Zengxiang's postscript cloud This line of layout "since the southern crossing of Zhejiang and Hangzhou demeanor". See Zhu Shangshu, "Narrative of the Song People's Collection", vol. 9, Dongpo Ji, pp. 413-418.
[61] Deng Guangming, "A Re-Discussion on the 'Theory of Distinguishing Treachery' Not Written by Su Xun -- A Reply to Professor Wang Shuizhao", Academic Collection, vol. 13, pp. 80-81.
[62] Wang Shuizhao, "On the <辨奸论>Dispute of Authenticity Again: Reading Mr. Deng Guangming< Re-Discussing the > of Su Xun's Non-Su Xun", Academic Collection, vol. 15, pp. 246-247.
[63] Wang Shuizhao, "On the <辨奸论>Dispute of Authenticity Again: Reading Mr. Deng Guangming< Re-Discussing the Theory of Distinguishing Adultery and > by Su Xun", Academic Collection, vol. 15, p. 242.
[64] "Proofnotes on the Complete Works of Su Shi", vol. 14, "Epitaph of Zhang Wending Cemetery", pp. 1494, 1495.
[65] (Song) Li Tao, Institute of Ancient Books Collation, Shanghai Normal University, Institute of Ancient Books, East China Normal University, "Continuation of Capital and Governance Tongjian", vol. 299 Yuanfeng 2nd Year July Jiaxu Tiao, Zhonghua Book Company, 2004 edition, p. 7267. Press, hereinafter referred to as the "long series".
[66] History of the Song Dynasty, vol. 318, Biography of Zhang Fangping, p. 10358.
[67] "The Complete Works of Music", vol. 35, "Sacrifice to Cai Zizheng Wen", "Sacrifice to Zhao Shaoshi", photocopy of Wenyuan Pavilion Siku Quanshu by the Taipei Commercial Press, vol. 1104, pp. 391, 392.
[68] (Song) Yue Ke, "Bao Zhen Zhai Fa Shu Zan", vol. 12 "Su Wenzhong Jin Dan Ti", photocopy of Wenyuan Ge Siku Quanshu by the Taipei Commercial Press, vol. 813, p. 701. Press, this post is also included in the second volume of "Su Shi's Complete Works Proofreading: Su Shi's Essays Compilation", entitled "Two Songs with Zhang Andao", page 8527.
[69] (Song) Fan Zuyu, "Fan Taishi Collection", vol. 28, "Ci Xin Except Xuanhui Southern Yuan Envoy Inspector Taifu Yi Former Prince Taibao Zhi Shi Zhang Fangping Resignation Exemption from Grace and Order", Taipei Commercial Press, photocopy of Wenyuan Pavilion Siku Quanshu, vol. 1100, p. 321.
[70] Appendix to "The Complete Works of Music" Wang Gong, "Xingzhi", photocopy of Wenyuan Ge Siku Quanshu, Taipei Commercial Press, vol. 1104, p. 539.
[71] "Long Edition", vol. 269, Xining 8th Winter, October Renchen Tiao, p. 6591.
[72] "Su Shi's Complete Works Proofnotes", vol. 49, "A Book with Zhang Tai'an", p. 5389.
[73] Wang Shuizhao, "On <辨奸论>the Dispute of Authenticity Again: Reading Mr. Deng Guangming< Re-Discussing the Theory of Distinguishing Adultery > Not Su Xun", Academic Collection, vol. 15, p. 242. Press, Kong Fanli: Volume 7 of "Su Zhe Annals" is also Su Shi's "Book of Thanks" in the first year of Yuanfeng. Academy Press, 2001, p. 182.
[74] Ouyang Xiu's Complete Works, vol. 96, p. 1487.
[75] History of the Song Dynasty, vol. 211, Zaifu Table II, p. 5488.
[76] Kong Fanli, The Annals of Su Shi, Vol. 13, Zhonghua Book Company, 1998, pp. 284, 302.
[77] Kong Fanli, Su Shi Annals, vol. 13, pp. 320, 321.
[78] Kong Fanli, Su Shi Annals, vol. 13, pp. 380-381.
[79] (Song) Ma Yongqing, Chang Shuang Shuang Proofreading: "Quotations of Mr. Yuancheng", Volume II, Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House, 2022 edition, p. 47.
[80] "Proofnotes on the Complete Works of Su Shi", vol. 49, "Reply to Li Duanshushu", p. 5345.
[81] "Proofnotes on the Complete Works of Su Shi", vol. 48, Huangzhou Shangwen Lu Gongshu, p. 5203.
[82] (Song) Shao Bo, edited by Liu Dequan and Li Jianxiong, Shaw Brothers Hearing and Seeing the Later Records, vol. 15, Zhonghua Book Company, 1983, p. 117.
[83] (Song) Li Jingde, ed., Wang Xingxian, Zhuzi Language, vol. 130, Zhonghua Book Company, 1986, p. 3104.
[84] (Song) Anonymous: The Complete History of the Song Dynasty, vol. 14, photocopied by the Taipei Commercial Press, Wenyuan Ge Siku Quanshu, vol. 330, p. 455. According to the "History of the Song Dynasty", Volume 19, "Huizong Ji I" (page 367) Yun "Yihai, the edict destroyed and published the "Tang Jian" and the three Su, Qin, Huang and other anthologies.
[85] (Song) Wu Zeng, "Neng Gai Zhai Manlu", vol. 11, "Except for the Dongpo Book Writing Tablet", Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House, 1979, new 1st edition, p. 327.
[86] (Song) Yang Wanli, Xin Gengru Jianxiao: Yang Wanli Ji Ji Ji School, vol. 83 "Shanxi Jushi Ji Hou Preface", Zhonghua Book Company, 2007 edition, p. 3352.
[87] (Qing) Xu Song, Liu Lin et al., "Song Hui Yao Manuscript Criminal Law" 2-88, Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House, 2014, p. 8330.
[88] History of the Song Dynasty, vol. 22, Huizong Ji IV, p. 414.
[89] (Song) Chen Jun, "Nine Dynasties Chronicle Notes" 29, photocopy of Wenyuan Pavilion Siku Quanshu by the Commercial Press, Taipei, vol. 328, p. 799.
[90] History of the Song Dynasty, vol. 19, Huizong Ji I, p. 369, Juan 21, Huizong Ji III, p. 390.
[91] Shaw Brothers Records After Hearing and Seeing, vol. 23, p. 179.
[92] Hu Shi, "Su Xun's Identification of Adultery"±, Wusong Monthly, No. 1, April 1929. He also included in the three collections of Hu Shi's Wencun, Shanghai Oriental Library, 1930, and the third volume of Hu Shi's Complete Works, Anhui Education Publishing House, 2003.
[93] "Tiaoxi Yuyin Cong Words", vol. 28, Dongpo III, p. 624.
[94] (Song) Chen Hu, edited by Kong Fanli, "Xitang Collection of the Old Continued", vol. 3 "Hong Yufu's Yu Zhangji Before and After Conflict", Zhonghua Book Company, 2002, p. 313.
[95] (Song) He Xue, Zhang Minghua Dianxiao, "Chunzhu Chronicles", vol. 3 "Ju Shi Lang Dan", Zhonghua Book Company, 1983 edition, p. 42.
[96] (Ming) Wang Wei, "Gusu Zhi", vol. 39, photocopied by the Taipei Commercial Press, Wenyuan Ge Siku Quanshu, vol. 493, p. 637.
[97] (Song) Fan Chengda, Chen Zhenyue, Wu Junzhi, vol. 28, "Jinshi Inscription", Jiangsu Ancient Books Publishing House, 1999, p. 411.
[98] See Zhu Shangshu, "Narrative of the Song People's Collections", vol. 9, Dongpo Collection, pp. 402-403.
[99] "Proofnotes on the Complete Works of Su Shi", vol. 49, "Reply to Liu Weidu Caoshu", pp. 5330-5331.
[100] "Proofnotes on the Complete Works of Su Shi", vol. 53, "Reply to Chen's Preaching of the Five Songs-2", p. 5905.
[101] "Proofnotes on the Complete Works of Su Shi", vol. 53, "Reply to Chen's Preaching Five Songs-3", p. 5907.
[102] "Proofnotes on the Complete Works of Su Shi", vol. 14, Fan Jingren's Epitaph, pp. 1445, 1447.
[103] (Song) Shao Bo, edited by Liu Dequan and Li Jianxiong, Shaw Brothers Hearing and Seeing the Later Records, vol. 19, Zhonghua Book Company, 1983, p. 148.
[104] Su Shi Annals, vol. 32, p. 1123.
[105] Su Shi Annals, vol. 29, pp. 923, 944.
[106] Su Shi Annals, vol. 30, pp. 947-948.
[107] Su Shi Annals, vol. 39, p. 1373.
[108] Su Shi Annals, vol. 30, pp. 951-952, 965.
[109] (Song) Zhou Bida, Wang Ruilai Proof: Zhou Bida Collection Proof, vol. 54 "Preface to the Collection of Shanxi Jushi Essays", Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House, 2020, p. 796.
[110] (Song) Sun Mao, (Song) Li Zuyao's Note, "Nei Jian Qi Mu", vol. 7 "With Su Shoujiwen", photocopy of Wenyuan Ge Siku Quanshu, vol. 1135, p. 536.
[111] According to the proofreading of the Complete Works of Su Shi, the proofreading of "The Complete Works of Su Shi" refers to Lang Ye's note to Yun Liu Wei's "Zi Shuzhi", and according to Lu Tao's "Epitaph on the Tomb of the Privy Liu Gong", Liu Wei is called Liu Zhenzi. This is not true. Examining Lu Tao's "Jingde Collection" Volume 21 "Epitaph of the Privy Privy Liu Gong", Liu Wei is the grandson of Liu Zhen, and Liu Zhen died in March of the first year of Yuan You. (Photocopy of Wenyuan Ge Siku Quanshu, Volume 1098, pp. 170, 176 by the Taipei Commercial Press.) According to the custom of the Song people, Su Shi should be called "Privy Prince" by Liu Zhen, instead of "my brother Longtu Gong in the same year" as in the "Answer to Liu Shuducao". And when Lu Tao Yuanyou wrote the "Epitaph on the Tomb of Privy Counsellor Liu" in the second year, Liu Wei was a "fake undertaker", and only thirteen or fourteen years later, he has been promoted to the capital transfer envoy, which seems to be too fast. Therefore, it is inferred that this Liu Wei is a different person with the same name, and Lang Ye's note is wrong. Again, (Ming) Wang Peiyu: "Coral Net" Volume 4 "Po Weng Nine Songs Scroll Authentic Works" cloud: "Song Nian from the flea year to respect Mr., Mr. Jiazang's writing is very rich, in recent years to buy Mr. 's books, especially in recent years, this is Mr. old books, letter treasure also." On the eighth day of the second month of the fourth year of Xuanhe, Liu Wei wrote. The Taipei Commercial Press photocopied the Wenyuan Pavilion Siku Quanshu, vol. 818, p. 59. Liu Wei was still there at the end of the Northern Song Dynasty.
[112] "Proofnotes on the Complete Works of Su Shi", vol. 49, "Reply to Liu Weidu Caoshu", pp. 5330-5332.
[113] (Song) Su Shi, "The Complete Works of Dongpo", vol. 33, "Tianqing Guan Ruquan Fu", photocopy of Wenyuan Pavilion Siku Quanshu, Taipei Commercial Press, vol. 1107, p. 471.
[114] Su Shi Annals, vol. 40, p. 1418.
[115] According to Zhu Shangshu's "Narrative of the Song People's Collections", vol. 9 "Dongpo Collection" (p. 401) and Yeyun's "Dongpo Later Collection" 20 volumes, "that is, it was supplemented by Liu Wei's catalogue and collected the poems and essays written on the way back to the north after the abolition of Hangzhou Zhizhou."
[116] (Song) Yang Zhongliang, "Huang Song Tongjian Changbian Chronicle", vol. 121 "Ban Yuan Yu Dangren Shang", Jiangsu Ancient Books Publishing House, 1988, photocopy of Wanwei Beizang, p. 3774.
[117] "Tiaoxi Yuyin Cong Words", vol. 37, Cai Tianqi, p. 243.
[118] "Tiaoxi Yuyin Cong Words", vol. 40, "Beauty Miscellaneous", p. 744.
[119] (Song) Qin Guan, Xu Peijun's Note: Huaihai Collection Note, Volume 2 of the Second Collection of Su Zizhan Ji Jiangnan Inscription Poems Incomplete Remainder Taste Record of Its Five Absolute Presents to Supplement Zizhan Zhi's Legacy, Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House, 1994, pp. 1404-1405.
[120] (Tang) Huang Tao, "Huang Yu Shi Ji" frontispiece Xie Ge, "Preface", photocopy of Wenyuan Ge Siku Quanshu, Taipei Commercial Press, vol. 1084, p. 90.
[121] (Song) Li Xinchuan, Xin Gengru Dianxiao, "Since the Establishment of the Yan Dynasty Chronicles", vol. 151, Shaoxing, 14th May, Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House, 2018, p. 2581.
[122] "Records of the Years since the Establishment of Yan", vol. 155, Shaoxing, 16th year, October Jiyoutiao, p. 2667.
[123] "Records of the Year since the Establishment of Yan", vol. 168, Shaoxing 25th year, Jiaxu Article, p. 2902.
[124] "Records of the Years since the Establishment of Yan", vol. 172, Shaoxing 26th May, Xin Choushuo, p. 3007, vol. 175, Shaoxing, 26th October, Yihai Article, p. 3057.
[125] (Song) Hong Mai, "Rong Zhai Essays: Five Strokes", vol. 9 "Zhu Wen of the Ghost Capture Chapter", Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House, 1978, p. 909.
[126] Yu Jiaxi, "The Dialectic of the Outline of the Four Libraries", vol. 22, The Complete Works of Dongpo One Hundred and Fifteen Volumes, Zhonghua Book Company, 1980, p. 1361.
[127] Quoted from Zhu Shangshu, "Narrative of the Song People's Collections", vol. 9, Dongpo Collection, p. 417.
[128] See Zhu Shangshu, "Narrative of the Song People's Collection", vol. 9, Dongpo Ji, pp. 419-421. According to Su Shi's anthology, there is still a Huangzhou version, "the end of the Northern Song Dynasty, the Southern Song Dynasty handed over the revised version", and the fragments of "Dongpo Later Collection", "Concert Collection", "Foreign Production Collection" and "He Tao Poems" are still preserved, "divided into several places", because the "First Collection" has been lost, so this article is not discussed. See the Narrative of the Song People's Collections, vol. 9, Dongpo Collection, pp. 409-413.
[129] Fu Zengxiang, "Zangyuan Qunshu Jing Yanlu", vol. 13, Zhonghua Book Company, 2009, p. 1164.
[130] "The Dialectic of the Four Libraries", vol. 22, Dongpo Complete Works One Hundred and Fifteen Volumes, p. 1361.
[131] Siku Quanshu General Catalogue, vol. 195, Siliu Words, p. 1783.
[132] (Song) Wang Gong, "Four Six Words", vol. 1478, p. 950, photocopied by the Commercial Press, Taipei.
[133] (Song) Chen Shan, Zha Qinghua, "The New Words of the Lice and the New Words", vol. 6 "The Biography of Chen Biaomin Ye Jia", Elephant Publishing House, 2012, Notes on the Song Dynasty (Part 5), p. 54.
[134] (Song) Shao Bowen, edited by Li Jianxiong and Liu Dequan, Shaw Brothers Wenjianlu, vol. 12, Zhonghua Book Company, 1983, pp. 130-131. Press, Zhang Fangping's word Antao, Zhen Wending.
[135] Wang Jinggong's Annals of the Chronicles, vol. 10, pp. 376-378.
[136] Liang Qichao, The Biography of Wang Anshi, Hainan Publishing House, 1993, pp. 61-62.
[137] Hu Shi, "°Su Xun's Identification of Adultery"±, Wusong Monthly, No. 1, April 1929. He also included in the three collections of Hu Shi's Wencun, Shanghai Oriental Library, 1930, and the third volume of Hu Shi's Complete Works, Anhui Education Publishing House, 2003.
[138] Deng Guangming, "Wang Anshi", Life, Reading, New Knowledge, 1953, "Preface", p. 5. According to the limitations of genre and space, Deng Guangming did not carry out further argumentation on this issue.
[139] (Song) Fang Shao, Xu Peizao and Yang Liyang, "Bo Zhai Ed.", Zhonghua Book Company, 1983, pp. 65-66. Press, "Gong Wen" should be a slander of "Gong Ou", which is said below.
[140] "Notes on the Proofreading" at the beginning of the book, p. 2.
[141] Zhang Peiheng, "°<辨奸论>Non-Shao Bowen Forgeries: Also on the Relevant Issues in the Annals of Wang Jinggong"±, in Collection of Doubts, pp. 76-81.
[142] Frontispiece of Shaw Brothers, "Original Preface", p. 1.
[143] Appendix to "Shaw Brothers Wenjianlu", "Shao Bo Henan Shaw Clans Wenjian Record Preface", p. 231.
[144] Shaw Brothers, vol. 5, p. 41.
[145] History of the Song Dynasty, vol. 26, Gaozong Ji III, vol. 27, Gaozong Ji IV, pp. 487, 504.
[146] Zhang Peiheng, "°<辨奸论>Non-Shao Bowen Forgeries: Also on the Relevant Issues in the Annals of Wang Jinggong"±, in Collection of Doubts, pp. 30-31.
[147] Deng Guangming, "°The <辨奸论>Re-examination and Re-judgment of the Question of Authenticity and Falsity"±, Studies in Chinese Studies, vol. 3, pp. 444-446.
[148] Wang Shuizhao, "°The <辨奸论>Dispute over Authenticity"±, in Wang Shuizhao's Selected Works, p. 741.
[149] Deng Guangming, "°Re-Discussion on 'Distinguishing Adultery' Not Written by Su Xun -- A Reply to Professor Wang Shuizhao"±, Academic Collection, vol. 13, p. 77.
[150] Wang Shuizhao, "°On the <辨奸论>Dispute of Authenticity Again: Reading Mr. Deng Guangming< Re-Discussing the Non-Su Xun's > in Discerning Adultery", Academic Collection, vol. 15, pp. 257-258.
[151] Fang Jian, "°<辨奸论>Pseudo-Writing and New Evidence: Commemorating the First Anniversary of Mr. Xu Gui's Return to Daoshan"±, in Huiyin Yongzhu: Professor Xu Gui's Memorial Collection, East China Normal University Press, 2012, p.284.
[152] Bozhai Ed., vol. I, p. 77.
[153] Zhang Peiheng, "°<辨奸论>Non-Shao Bowen Forgeries—Also on the Relevant Issues in the Examination of the Annals of Wang Jinggong"±, in Collection of Doubts, p. 76.
[154] "The Complete Works of Music", vol. 39, "The Tomb of Mr. Wen'an"±, photocopy of Wenyuan Ge Siku Quanshu, Taipei Commercial Press, vol. 1104, p. 488.
[155] Wang Jinggong's Annals of the Chronicles, vol. 9, p. 355.
[156] Fang Jian, "°The <辨奸论>New Evidence of False Writings: Commemorating the First Anniversary of Mr. Xu Gui's Return to Daoshan"±, in Huiyin Yongzhu: Professor Xu Gui's Memorial Anthology, p. 270.
[157] (Song) Wang Gong, Zhu Jieren, "Silent Notes", vol. II, Zhonghua Book Company, 1981, p. 48.
[158] Bo Zhai Ed., vol. I, pp. 65-66.
[159] (Ming) Ma Luan and (Qing) Gu Donggao, Feng Huimin, Sima Guangnian, Zhonghua Book Company, 1990, pp. 106, 107, 118, 158.
[160] Liu Deqing, "Ouyang Xiuji Annals", Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House, 2006, pp. 258, 349.
[161] "Long Edition", vol. 179 to March of the 2nd year, vol. 189 Jiayu 4th May, pp. 4324, 4566.
[162] Shaw Brothers, vol. 12, pp. 130-131.
[163] "Zhou Bi Da Ji Proof", vol. 182, Erlaotang Magazine, Ji Lu Wuguan Ershuo, p. 2778.
[164] Shaw Brothers, vol. 12, p. 131.
[165] Summer Retreat, vol. 1, p. 247.
[166] Wang Jinggong's Annals of the Chronicles, vol. 9, p. 351.
[167] Bo Zhai (Bo Zhai Ed.), vol. 7, p. 41.
[168] (Song) Gong Yizheng, Li Guoqiang, "Mustard Hidden Notes: Jing Gong Zhu and Zi", Elephant Publishing House, 2012, Notes on the Song Dynasty (Part 5), pp. 92-93.
[169] Liu Chengguo, "Wang Anshi's Annals", vol. 3, Zhonghua Book Company, 2018, pp. 367-368.
[170] (Song) Wang Anshi, (Song) Li Bijian, Gao Keqindianxiao: Wang Jingwen Gong's Poetry Note, vol. 7 "Tiger Map", Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House, 2010, p. 164.
[171] Fang Jian, "°New <辨奸论>Evidence of False Writings: Commemorating the First Anniversary of Mr. Xu Gui's Return to Daoshan"±, in Huiyin Yongzhu: Professor Xu Gui's Memorial Collection, p. 269.
[172] See Liu Chengguo, Wang Anshi's Annals, vol. 3, pp. 375-376.
[173] Fang Jian, "°New <辨奸论>Evidence of False Writings: Commemorating the First Anniversary of Mr. Xu Gui's Return to Daoshan"±, Huiyin Yongzhu: Professor Xu Gui's Memorial Essays, pp. 269-270.
[174] Zhu Zi Linguistics, vol. 130, p. 3109.
[175] (Song) Zhu Ben, edited by Kong Fanli, Qu Wei Old News, vol. 10, Zhonghua Book Company, 2002, pp. 230-231.
[176] (Song) Zhou Mi, compiled by Huang Baohua, "Hao Ran Zhai Ya Tan" vol. shang, Elephant Publishing House, 2017, Notes on the Song Dynasty (Part VIII), p. 137.
[177] Zhang Jiaju, "°<辨奸论>The Forgery is the Microcosm of the Party Struggle in the Last Years of the Northern Song Dynasty -- and a Brief Discussion on Shao Bowen and Him<闻见录>"±, Wen Wei Po, April 4, 1961. He also wrote "Zhang Jiaju's Historical Studies", entitled "<辨奸论>The Forgery is the Microcosm of the Party Struggle in the Last Years of the Northern Song Dynasty", Shanghai People's Publishing House, 2010, pp. 231-232.
[178] Wu Mengfu and Zhan Yayuan, "°A New Exploration of Su Xun's Thought"±, Journal of Anhui University, No. 3, 1982.
[179] Liu Shaoquan, "Su Laoquan Annals"±, Sichuan Provincial Central Book Committee, 1981.
[180] Zeng Zaozhuang, "°Liu Shaoquan <苏老泉年谱>Discussion"±, Journal of Sichuan Library, No. 4, 1983.
[181] Summer Retreat, vol. I, p. 247.
[182] Records of the Aftermath of Hearing and Seeing, vol. 14, p. 111. Press, "Machine Theory and Balance" is regarded as "Machine Strategy and Balance Theory", and the title of the two articles written by Su Xun.
[183] Zeng Zaozhuang, "°<辨奸论>Examination of Authenticity and Falsity"±, in Sansu Studies: Zeng Zaozhuang Wencun No. 1, pp. 116-121.
[184] Xu Wenming, "°The Similarities and Differences between Su Xun and Wang Anshi"±, Journal of Tsinghua University, No. 2, 2002.
[185] "The New Words of the Lice and the Lice of the Lice Novel," vol. 6, "Su Mingyun's Treatise on Distinguishing Treachery," p. 50.
[186] "The Complete Works of Music", vol. 39, "The Tomb of Mr. Wen'an"±, photocopy of Wenyuan Ge Siku Quanshu, Taipei Commercial Press, vol. 1104, p. 488.
[187] "Su Shi's Complete Works Proofnotes", vol. 49, Xie Zhang Taibao wrote the book of the tombs of the ancestors, p. 5319.
[188] Shaw Brothers, vol. 12, p. 131.
[189] Summer Retreat, vol. I., p. 247.
[190] Shaw Brothers Records after Hearing and Seeing, vol. 14, p. 111.
[191] Kong Fanli, Su Shi Annals, vol. 8, p. 158.
[192] History of the Song Dynasty, vol. 339, Su Zhe Biography, p. 10822.
[193] History of the Song Dynasty, vol. 161, Zhiguan Zhi I, p. 3792.
[194] History of the Song Dynasty, vol. 338, Biography of Su Shi, pp. 10802, 10804.
[195] (Song) Su Zhe, Chen Hongtian and Gao Xiufang, "Su Zhe Ji Luancheng Later Collection", vol. 23, "Epitaph of the Deceased Brother Zhan Duanming", Zhonghua Book Company, 1990 edition, p. 1118.
[196] History of the Song Dynasty, vol. 163, Zhi Guan Zhi III, p. 3841.
[197] "Long Edition", vol. 193 Jiayu Zhengyue Ding Weitiao, p. 4662.
[198] (Song) Zhou Zizhi, "Taicang Rice Collection", vol. 49 "Reading Poetry"±, photocopy of Wenyuan Ge Siku Quanshu, vol. 1141, p. 347, Taipei Commercial Press.
[199] See Liu Chengguo, Wang Anshi's Annals Long Edition, vol. 7, p. 2014.
[200] See Zhang Peiheng, "<辨奸论>Non-Shao Bowen Forgeries: Also on the Relevant Issues in the Annals of Wang Jinggong", in Collection of Doubts, pp. 71-72.
[201] History of the Song Dynasty, vol. 14, Shenzong Ji I, pp. 268, 270, 271.
[202] "Junzhai Reading Chronicles", vol. 6, Yingzong Shilu, p. 230.
[203] Zhizhai Shulu Solution, vol. 4, Yingzong Shilu, p. 129.
[204] "Long Edition", vol. 378 Yuanyou, May Jiashen Article (p. 9192) Yun: "Recorded the grandson of Jia An, a scholar of Hanlin, who wrote the "Records of Emperor Yingzong" in advance, and died before he could push his grace. ”
[205] (Song) Written by Du Daqi, proofread by Gu Hongyi and Su Xian: The first volume of the first volume of the "Famous Minister's Tablet Biography Wanyan Collection" Li Qingchen's "Wang Wengong Gongqi Shendao Tablet" said that Wang Qi tried to "revise the "Renzong", "Yingzong Shilu" and "Zhengshi", many of which were published, but not long words. On the draft, the first emperor issued an edict to Biban and Ma". Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House, 2021 edition, p. 176.
[206] (Song) Wang Mingqing, Yan Yongcheng, ed., Vol. 1 of the Third Record of the Wave of the Lu, Elephant Publishing House, 2013, Notes on the Song Dynasty (Part VI), p. 253.
[207] (Song) Ma Duanlin, Institute of Ancient Books, Shanghai Normal University, Institute of Ancient Books, East China Normal University, "Literature General Examination", vol. 194 "Jing Ji Kao 21", Zhonghua Book Company, 2011 edition, p. 5636.
[208] Liu Chengguo, Wang Anshi's Annals, vol. 3, vol. 4, pp. 754, 770, 785.
[209] (Song) Wang Anshi, Liu Chengguo, "Wang Anshi's Collected Works", vol. 42, "Beggars and Exemptions from Repairing the Record", Zhonghua Book Company, 2021 edition, p. 702.
[210] (Song) by Lü Xizhe, compiled by Xia Guangxing, "Lü's Miscellaneous Notes", Elephant Publishing House, 2003, Notes on the Song Dynasty (Part I), p. 284.
[211] Shaw Brothers Records After Hearing and Seeing, vol. 14, p. 111.
[212] (Song) Peng Baichuan, "Taiping Zhizhi Tong", vol. 25 "Su Shi Lichao", Jiangsu Guangling Ancient Book Engraving and Printing Society, 1990, p. 442.
[213] (Song) Yang Shi, Song Yueyang, "Quotations of Mr. Guishan", vol. 3 "What Yu Hang Hears", Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House, 2022, p. 70. According to Zhu Xi's "Words and Deeds of Famous Ministers of the Five Dynasties", Volume 10-5 "Mr. Lao Su" also quoted this passage from "Guishan Quotations".
[214] (Song) Anonymous, edited by Zhao Weiguo, "Daoshan Qinghua", Elephant Publishing House, 2006, Notes on the Song Dynasty (Part II), p. 98.
[215] Summer Retreat, vol. I, pp. 246-247.
[216] "Long Edition", vol. 208 Zhiping 3rd June, p. 5054.
[217] "The Biography of Lao Su Ben", in the appendix volume of Jiayou Ji, photocopy of Wenyuan Ge Siku Quanshu, Taipei Commercial Press, vol. 1039, p. 283.
[218] History of the Song Dynasty, vol. 443, Su Xun Biography, p. 13097.
▼
1. Song Dynasty History Research Information 1
E-mail: [email protected]