Except for Mao Xinghuo, no one dares to claim the title of king! The main reason why his lawsuit against Mo Yan is called a farce is that his so-called evidence is all taken from Mo Yan's novels and taken out of context. This point was made very clear by Zhejiang Literature and Art Publishing House in its reply. Unfortunately, many people don't understand and instead attack the publishing house. It's ridiculous.
For example, he said that Mo Yan glorified the Japanese invaders, but the fragments and sentences he found were actually the perspective of the characters in the book, and he said that Mo Yan's smearing of the Eighth Route Army was actually the perspective of the characters in the book. And the description of the atrocities of the Japanese army in the book, the positive description of the discipline and heroic battle of the Eighth Route Army, this guy did not mention a word, and someone told him that he also pretended not to see it.
For example, Mao Xinghuo found a passage from "Red Sorghum Family", if he was a member of the Iron Plate Club, he decided that this was Mo Yan smearing the Jiaodong Brigade. The Jiaodong Brigade was an army led by the Communist Party, which was still weak in Shandong at that time. The iron plate led by Yu Zhanao snatched the weapons of the Jiaodong Brigade, and the Jiaodong Brigade took advantage of Yu Zhanao's funeral for his wife to launch a surprise attack to retrieve the weapons.
This is the background of the scolding of the members of the Iron Plate Club. The Leng detachment commander was the army of the Kuomintang. And later in the story, the Japanese devils suddenly came again, and the team of the captain of the cold detachment could not resist, and someone came over to release the people of the Jiaodong Brigade and the Iron Plate Society, and the two sides worked together with the people of the captain of the cold detachment to fight the Japanese devils. This is the end of the story. But Mao Xinghuo avoided talking about these positive descriptions. He deliberately took the quote out of context to fool people who hadn't read the book.
Recently, Mao Xinghuo happily declared that he had found new evidence, and "facts speak louder than words"!
The picture he cites is the following one:
The sentence in the orange wireframe is the new "proof" that excites him. He picked these two sentences, and he was stupid, and he didn't erase the other words.
This is from "Writing in Our Time<酒国>: <生死疲劳>Dialogues." It is a discussion draft between New York University professor Zhang Xudong and Mo Yan, which was later compiled and published.
This traditional Chinese version was published by Oxford University Press in Hong Kong in November 2012 on the occasion of Mo Yan's Nobel Prize, and was also published by Shanghai Literature and Art Publishing House the following year.
However, when the Shanghai Literature and Art Publishing House was published, the title was changed to "Writing in Our Times", and some words were adjusted to remove what Mo Yan said:
For this evidence, Kunlun Ce also "used" it and joined Mao Xinghuo's "war" against Mo Yan. However, even from the perspective of Hong Kong publishing, it has context, and it cannot be taken out of context.
In the novel "Fatigue of Life and Death", the cow is beaten to death, but insists on going to the field of a single household to die. This implication is what Mo Yan said, "encouraging going it alone". Zhang Xudong said here, "If you are given a ...... on the platform."
Many people know that in that era, they often went online on some things, and they were "digging the corners of socialism" at every turn, just like the "socialist wool" said in the sketch. This was said to be reactionary at the time.
Mo Yan followed Zhang Xudong's words, meaning that according to the standards of that time, his novels were reactionary. But in this case, can it be said that Mo Yan is really reactionary? It is just that encouraging him to go it alone is contrary to the policy of the time.
Although Mo Yan's idea of encouraging going it alone was contrary to the policy of the time, later facts proved that going it alone was the right path, that is, after the Third Plenary Session of the 11th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China in 1978, the household responsibility system was introduced.
The so-called evidence discovered by Mao Xinghuo should also come from the blogger Qiu Shengcai, who also posted it on March 31, but the time was later than Qiu Shengcai, and he was a second-class dealer, but it must also be "like a treasure".
I was still surprised that Leng Yan could follow Mao Xinghuo and shout. Leng Yan, the poems he wrote are good. I thought I was a literati who knew literature, but it seemed that he only knew poetry. Poetry is jumpy, and his thinking always seems to be jumping, not knowing the context to connect and read.
Interestingly, such a poet is also a fan of Mao Xinghuo, and I don't know if there is a reward.
Now that we have obtained the "real evidence," we should report it directly to the relevant departments, and what is the use of posting it on the Internet? You can call the police to see if the police will arrest people. If you don't call the police, you can only get angry if you only shout on the Internet.
If a writer can be taken down by taking it out of context, then needless to say, go back in time. This used to happen almost every day. A word, a word, can ruin a person's future and become a reactionary element.