After exhausting the property investigation measures, the court found that Zheng Shuang had no property to enforce
The official website of the Shanghai High People's Court recently disclosed an enforcement ruling, which was issued by the Shanghai Songjiang District Court on the contract dispute between Zheng Shuang and Zhejiang Haining Dongkai Star Film and Television Investment Co., Ltd. According to the content of the document, the court held that after exhausting the property investigation measures, Zheng Shuang, the person subject to enforcement in the case, had no property to be enforced, so there was no condition for continued enforcement, and the enforcement procedure should be terminated. According to the information, Zheng Shuang was previously forced to pay 90.5 million yuan for this case, and was restricted from high consumption and equity freezing.
The result of the ruling of the instrument
The Dawan News reporter saw from the document that the execution relationship was a dispute over the service contract between Zhejiang Haining Dongkai Star Film and Television Investment Co., Ltd. and Zheng Shuang. The effective legal documents determined that Zheng Shuang would return the service fee of 30.5 million yuan and compensate the company for economic losses of 60 million yuan. Because the obligor Zheng Shuang failed to perform its obligations in accordance with the provisions of the effective legal documents, the obligee applied to the court for enforcement. On December 7, 2023, the court filed the case for enforcement, and issued an enforcement notice and a property report order to the person subject to enforcement, ordering it to perform the above obligations within a time limit, and bear the enforcement fee of RMB 157,900 and the interest payable for delay in performance in accordance with the law.
In the course of enforcement, the court adopted a variety of enforcement measures in accordance with the law, issued an enforcement notice to Zheng Shuang, ordering him to perform the obligations set forth in the legal documents within the time limit, summoning him to accept investigation and questioning, and reporting the status of his property, but he did not appear in court within the time limit. It also issued inquiry notices to multiple departments through the enforcement network inspection and control system to inquire about the property in the name of Zheng Shuang, the person subject to enforcement, and Zheng Shuang was restricted from high consumption and equity frozen.
After an interview with the person applying for enforcement, the court has informed the implementation of the case, the property investigation measures, the property situation of the person subject to enforcement, the basis for terminating the enforcement procedure and the legal consequences, etc., and the applicant for enforcement cannot provide the court with clues about the property of the person subject to enforcement within the specified time limit, and agrees to terminate the enforcement procedure.
The court held that after exhausting the property investigation measures, the person subject to enforcement, Zheng Shuang, has no property available for enforcement for the time being, so there is no condition for continuing enforcement, and the enforcement procedure should be terminated. Therefore, it was decided to terminate the enforcement procedure.
According to the official website of the Shanghai High People's Court, previously, on December 21, 2023, the Shanghai Songjiang District People's Court served an announcement to Zheng Shuang in accordance with the law: Due to the failure to perform the obligations determined by the civil judgment, Haining Dongkai Star Film and Television Investment Co., Ltd. has applied to the court for enforcement, and is now serving the enforcement notice, the property reporting order, and the legal documents made in the future enforcement, such as the consumption restriction order, the inclusion in the list of dishonest judgment defaulters, the restriction on leaving the country, etc., sealing, seizure, freezing, seizure, detention, withdrawal, auction, Where there is no change in the circumstances of rulings such as for the sale, as well as assessment reports and other legal documents, a separate announcement is not to be made.
Case Enforcement Context
Dawan News reporter Zhu Qingling
Edited by Wang Cui