laitimes

The live broadcast of Dong Yuhui Museum caused controversy, and the fill light was filmed for a long time, which would destroy the cultural relics

author:Four pounds

There are many popular people, and the well-known Internet celebrity Dong Yuhui's trip to Hubei is constantly controversial.

First, when I visited the park, I was surrounded by dozens of security guards, and netizens complained about the pomp, and now, after going to the Hubei Museum for live broadcast, I was questioned by netizens about "illegal lighting".

The live broadcast of Dong Yuhui Museum caused controversy, and the fill light was filmed for a long time, which would destroy the cultural relics

It is reported that Dong Yuhui, the anchor with goods, started a high-profile live broadcast journey in Hubei, and was led to visit the Hubei Provincial Museum and Jingzhou Museum like the stars holding the moon.

Especially when he was in the Hubei Provincial Museum, Dong Yuhui conducted a two-and-a-half-hour live broadcast, and more than 200,000 people watched the "national son-in-law's" small essay on the mouth of the lotus.

Even Dr. Yang Lisheng, the director of academic research at the venue, and Cui Hang, a docent from the Ministry of Social Education, accompanied Dong Yuhui throughout the tour.

The live broadcast of Dong Yuhui Museum caused controversy, and the fill light was filmed for a long time, which would destroy the cultural relics

Big stars came to visit the Hubei Provincial Museum, which was originally a good thing to increase traffic and popularity.

As a result, careful netizens found that when Dong Yuhui was live broadcasting, the live broadcast team behind it actually used a fill light to follow the whole process, which was suspected of serious violations!

Through the screenshots of netizens, it can also be seen that in the reflection of some cultural relics in the museum, behind Dong Yuhui is someone holding a huge long light bulb for supplemental light shooting.

The live broadcast of Dong Yuhui Museum caused controversy, and the fill light was filmed for a long time, which would destroy the cultural relics

may be because the museum lights are relatively dim, which is not conducive to showing Dong Yuhui's tall image, so the staff behind him held up the light sign very hard, and desperately made Dong Yuhui brighter in the live broadcast footage.

But the problem is that the Hubei Provincial Museum had previously made it clear that visitors were prohibited from using flashing lights.

The live broadcast of Dong Yuhui Museum caused controversy, and the fill light was filmed for a long time, which would destroy the cultural relics

Relevant industry experts in the field of cultural relics protection have also said that many cultural relics in museums belong to light-sensitive materials, and strong light sources are likely to damage cultural relics and cause irreversible damage.

That's why most museums are dimly lit.

It's not that museums are reluctant to turn on the lights in order to save money, but to protect these precious cultural relics to the greatest extent.

On the other hand, after the Internet celebrity anchor Dong Yuhui came, after this group of people came, they not only used a strong light source, but even irradiated it for a long time during the live broadcast.

Although the target of the irradiation is Dong Yuhui himself, it will inevitably illuminate the surrounding cultural relics, which is likely to cause some damage.

The live broadcast of Dong Yuhui Museum caused controversy, and the fill light was filmed for a long time, which would destroy the cultural relics

In this regard, a reporter specifically asked the two museums for verification.

Here the reporter played a careful thought, and at first called the public consultation number of the Hubei Provincial Museum as an ordinary tourist.

We asked if the use of flash and fill lights is prohibited when visiting the museum.

The live broadcast of Dong Yuhui Museum caused controversy, and the fill light was filmed for a long time, which would destroy the cultural relics

The other party directly responded that yes, ordinary visitors are not allowed to use flashing lights, fill lights and similar lighting equipment in the museum.

But when the reporter then asked Dong Yuhui why he could turn on the lights during the live broadcast, the other party no longer answered.

After that, the reporter contacted the museum office again and asked by phone whether Dong Yuhui's live broadcast of the fill light would affect the cultural relics.

The staff of the other party replied quite cautiously, saying that if you need an interview, please "write" through a formal channel, and if not, you can't respond.

Although the museum's attitude is very vague, whether it is the visitor guide on the official website or the tour instructions written in the museum, it is clearly marked that please do not use flash to take photos in the exhibition hall.

The live broadcast of Dong Yuhui Museum caused controversy, and the fill light was filmed for a long time, which would destroy the cultural relics

On the official account of the museum, it has also posted a requirement for civilized visits, which clearly states that it is forbidden to use flash for taking photos and videos, because strong light can damage sensitive materials.

So the question is, why is it clear that the museum has banned strong light shooting cultural relics, and why ordinary people know that they can't use strong light when entering the museum, but when an Internet celebrity anchor is in the museum, he can follow the fill light throughout the whole process?

The live broadcast of Dong Yuhui Museum caused controversy, and the fill light was filmed for a long time, which would destroy the cultural relics

Some fans of Dong Yuhui may feel that the fill light of the live broadcast is not a flash, and this brightness may not cause damage to the cultural relics.

So what I said is not good, is it that as long as it is within a reasonable range, we ordinary people can also take the fill light into the museum to visit?

If we can, then the news of Dong Yuhui's visit will be fine, and we will also bring our own lights to take pictures in the future.

But if museums only use regulations to restrain and reject ordinary people, on the other hand, they are particularly tolerant of Internet celebrity anchors.

The live broadcast of Dong Yuhui Museum caused controversy, and the fill light was filmed for a long time, which would destroy the cultural relics

Then I don't think this is to serve the people, but to add to the people's blockage

The distinction cannot be so obvious.

Cultural relics can't make a sound and cry, and the fill light in Dong Yu's hand and the fill light in the hands of ordinary people will not cause a gap because of the nobility and wealth of the user, so I personally think Dong Yuhui has really gone too far this time.

The live broadcast of Dong Yuhui Museum caused controversy, and the fill light was filmed for a long time, which would destroy the cultural relics

If it is said that he used dozens of security guards to fight in a big formation and pomp when he visited the park before, and he was just a little forced to do so, then his live broadcast in the museum this time is a typical tail in the sky.

After he became popular, he really floated, and he was no longer the ordinary teenager who talked eloquently back then.

The live broadcast of Dong Yuhui Museum caused controversy, and the fill light was filmed for a long time, which would destroy the cultural relics

Read on