Text | Land abandonment
The terrorist attack on the Moscow Concert Hall has already caused heavy casualties, with more than 140 dead, and some reports suggest that it could reach more than 150. This incident is undoubtedly one of the most serious terrorist attacks in the world since the 911 terrorist attacks. After the incident, all parties expressed great concern about the identity of the mastermind behind the scenes. Judging from the current situation, although the "Islamic State" has acknowledged the attack, neither Putin nor Russian officials have explicitly pointed the finger at the "Islamic State" or the K-group. This may be because the investigation is still ongoing and the truth is not yet fully clear, or it may be because of the complex international political factors involved that need to be approached with caution. The reasons behind this incident and the potential impact on the Russia-Ukraine war and the global situation are indeed worth exploring and studying in depth.
As of now, there are three main versions of the truth about the terrorist attack at the Moscow Concert Hall. First of all, the photos published by the ISIS-K organization have attracted a lot of attention. The photographs depict people who bear a striking resemblance to the four people directly involved in the Russian arrests, and their clothing also matches, providing strong evidence of ISIS-K's involvement in the incident. However, photographs alone do not fully conclude that ISIS-K was behind the attack, and further in-depth investigation is needed.
In addition, two other versions are also circulating internationally. One of them concerns Ukraine, a claim that has been officially denied by the Ukrainian side, despite being popular in Russia, calling into question the veracity of this version. The other version is more complex and speculative. Some believe that Russia may have some kind of secret connection with ISIS, or even that Russia may have staged the attack itself. However, this claim is currently not supported by conclusive evidence, and is only a speculation and speculation. In all three versions, there are many opinions on the international and Internet due to different opinions. Due to the lack of conclusive evidence, it is difficult to determine which version is authentic. Therefore, further investigation efforts are needed to gather more evidence to uncover the truth about this terrorist attack. Only through in-depth investigation and objective analysis can the truth be restored and strong support for victims and social justice.
The Russian side did not immediately give credence to ISIS-K's claims of responsibility for the terrorist attack, but maintained a cautious and cautious attitude. Although the Islamic State has come forward to admit it on its own, Russian officials do not intend to take this claim lightly, choosing instead to conduct a more in-depth and detailed investigation. At present, opinions and speculations on this matter are endless, and it is difficult to reach a consensus conclusion. Among the arrested suspects, their passports show that they are of Tajik nationality. However, it was verified that the names on the passports did not match the real individuals, and the names on the passports were still living in Tajikistan and had not left the country for a long time. This discovery suggests that the perpetrators of the terrorist attack most likely used forged passports to conceal their true identities and backgrounds, which makes the truth of the whole incident even more confusing.
Russian law enforcement agencies have used a variety of methods to interrogate the four men after their arrests, hoping to obtain more information about the masterminds behind the attack and the motives for the attacks. However, after repeated interrogations, they all insisted that they did not know who was behind the scenes. They claim that the instructions they receive, the delivery of money and the source of their weapons are all done through the Internet, and that they are merely executors. This statement makes the investigation of the whole incident more complicated and difficult. So far, the Russian side has arrested a total of 11 people related to the incident.
Of these, seven have been identified as relevant persons, but information on their specific identities and roles has not yet been released. The seven were not directly involved in the terrorist attack at the scene. As for the four people who directly carried out the attack, Russian law enforcement agencies have conducted various interrogations and interrogations, and their accounts have remained consistent so far, which has made it more difficult to uncover the truth of the incident. However, the Russian side has not given up on the investigation of the matter, believing that in the near future, with the deepening of the investigation and the accumulation of evidence, the truth of the incident will eventually be revealed to the world.
Judging from the information and intelligence that has been released so far, this incident seems to be far more complex than it seems. From the outset, ISIS was eager to claim responsibility, but upon closer inspection, it became clear that the truth may not be so simple. However, as the investigation progressed, Russia's position gradually emerged, and it seemed that the spearhead was pointed at Ukraine. President Putin has publicly stated that the arrested suspects are trying to flee in the direction of Ukraine, which has further sparked speculation about the possible involvement of external forces behind the incident. Of course, there are still different opinions about the truth of this matter, and various versions of speculation and speculation are endless. In this age of information and hard to distinguish between truth and falsehood, it has become extremely difficult to determine the truth. The multiplicity of different accounts and opinions makes it difficult to determine which one to believe.
Ask a hypothetical question: If it is ultimately confirmed that this incident is related to Ukraine, what will be the international repercussions? Although the Ukrainian president has publicly denied any connection to the incident, assuming that Putin or the Russian side firmly believes that Ukraine's involvement, or even broader external forces, such as the United States, NATO, etc., will undoubtedly cause an international uproar. It is not yet possible to draw a definitive conclusion as to whether such a situation will trigger a third world war.
The events in Ukraine will have a profound and significant impact on the rise of national unity and nationalist sentiment in Russia. The Russian nation has always been known for its unity and tenacity, and this incident seems to be further fueling the rise of national sentiment and making the atmosphere of unity in the country even stronger. The Russian media is also keenly aware of this trend and is actively promoting in this direction, trying to further consolidate domestic unity through the guidance of public opinion. Regarding the details of the incident, according to published information, the white liaison car was successfully intercepted about 350 kilometers from southern Russia and about 85 kilometers from the border. Several of the suspects in the car have been apprehended, and after preliminary interrogation, they appear intent on fleeing to Ukraine.
This finding undoubtedly adds more complexity and uncertainty to the context of the event, making it extremely difficult for Ukraine to completely dissociate itself from the incident. Against this background, if Russia manipulates it in the press and public opinion, the conflict between Russia and Ukraine will inevitably further expand and intensify. This expansion may not only involve confrontation at the military level, but may also involve all-out confrontation in the political, economic, cultural and other fields. The exact extent of the expansion is difficult to predict with precision, but it is certain that this incident has become an important turning point in Russia-Ukraine relations, with far-reaching implications for both sides and the world.
In addition, this incident implies a more serious question, that is, whether it will trigger a third world war. It's a chilling assumption, but the possibility of its existence must be confronted. Especially considering that Russia may use this incident, which they believe is a terrorist attack by Ukraine, to use tactical nuclear bombs. The likelihood has risen significantly, as Russia seems to have a strong reason and motivation to use this extremely destructive weapon. We must be soberly aware that the attack on the Crocus concert hall was the largest intra-city terrorist attack in the world since 911. The casualties and destruction caused by it have reached unprecedented proportions, causing great global shock and panic. If Russia really uses tactical nuclear weapons on this ground, it will be difficult for the international community to effectively stop and condemn it. This would be an extremely dangerous signal that could trigger panic and unrest on a global scale, or even lead to the outbreak of a larger war.
The change in Russia's designation of the conflict in Ukraine, from the original "special military operation" to what is now commonly referred to as the "Russia-Ukraine war", reflects the complexity and dynamics of the situation. Behind the different titles, there may be different strategic considerations, information interpretations, and different understandings of the nature of the event from the outside world.
Fears about whether this would lead to a third world war are indeed widespread. However, there is currently no conclusive evidence that this extreme scenario will occur. Conflicts and tensions in international relations are often influenced by multiple factors, including political, economic, military and cultural dimensions. The international community generally prefers to resolve disputes through peaceful means and to avoid the escalation of wars and conflicts. However, the future is still uncertain. Therefore, all parties should exercise restraint and rationality and seek a peaceful solution through dialogue and consultation. The international community should also strengthen cooperation to jointly maintain regional peace and stability and avoid further deterioration of the situation. Only in this way can we effectively reduce the risk of the outbreak of war and maintain world peace and tranquility.
Copyright Notice: This article is the author's original article, the picture comes from the Internet, the text content of this article is strictly prohibited from being illegally reproduced without authorization, if you need to reprint or quote must obtain the author's consent and indicate the source.