Is there any difference between Mo Yan writing novels and publishing articles on the platform? In essence, there is no difference, both of them are text products that are exported to society.
In other words, Mo Yan and we are both social behaviors, subject to certain norms, and bear certain social responsibilities. Mo Yan's published works are subject to a set of review procedures, and we must comply with the platform rules when publishing works on the platform.
In the criticism and counter-criticism of Mo Yan, there is a view that Mo Yan has the freedom to create, and that criticizing Mo Yan is a manifestation of suppressing freedom. The moment your work is exported to society, the social responsibility you assume and the norms you have to be subject to begin, and the absolute freedom of your creation begins to change into relative freedom, and what is not suitable for publication cannot be published, and what is not suitable for publication cannot be passed.
Some people may say that there is no problem with Mo Yan's works having been published by the Taisha and winning numerous awards, and that is what a certain publishing group has said about the resumption of the petition department, but this is really not the case, and I have passed articles for many days and sometimes received notices saying that they are not suitable for publication! Did I say anything?
As long as you create not only for your own appreciation, but to export to society, there will be no absolute freedom, this is common sense, there is no "extraterritoriality" above the rules.
I remember a netizen said such a thing, she posted an article with text and pictures from Mo Yan's novel "Joy", but the article failed to pass the review on the grounds that it "involves vulgar and pornographic content", and was deducted 20 credit points. It can be seen from this that the lethality of Mo Yan's works is serious, and if measured by the standards of the platform, Mo Yan's works will be judged to violate the rules of the platform.
Now Mo Yan is facing a lot of criticism, very big, and even some people want to use legal means, this is not a question of suppressing the freedom of creation, but the conflict between the scale of freedom and social norms, the freedom of creation collides with the red line of social norms, and social norms will inevitably react, light up the alarm, and if the collision is severe, the reaction will be fierce.