laitimes

Writing robot "artifact", has it defeated formalism?

author:Calligraphy Commune

Pay attention to ▲Calligraphy Commune▲ With thousands of book elites,

Explore a new way of life in China's calligraphy, painting and printing!

Writing robot "artifact", has it defeated formalism?

Source: l Governor of Chang'an Street

Author: l Tian Wenzhi

分享 El 书艺公社(ID:Schuffaorg)

Open the page of computer software, copy and paste electronic documents, and the writer can "write" a page of paper manuscripts with "divine restoration" of handwriting in a few minutes; it can also be "customized" to imitate one's own handwriting, "not even acquaintances can not see it." Recently, the "writing robot" imitation handwriting products on the e-commerce platform have been selling well. The price ranges from 200 yuan to 1,000 yuan, and some stores have sold more than 30,000 orders.

Writing robot "artifact", has it defeated formalism?

Who is robbing these "writing robots"? Media surveys have found that most of them are consumers who are deeply involved in various "handwritten" evaluations. For example, the group of teachers. Some middle school teachers complained that teaching has now been fully electronic, but they require that the lesson plans must be handwritten, and they must write at least seventy or eighty lesson plans a semester, full of several large books, "purely for inspection". If there are grassroots cadres with various handwriting tasks, some people share, "I make up notes day and night, copy large paragraphs of the original text", "I am busy working during the day, and I make up materials at night". In some localities, village cadres are even required to hand-copy "notes on law popularization" and copy a full copy of the legal provisions, but in fact they "cannot read it." When the anxiety was exhausted, such a "painless handwriting product" appeared, and it is no wonder that it was regarded as an "artifact".

Writing robot "artifact", has it defeated formalism?

In all fairness, "handwriting" helps with deep memory and deep thinking. Leaving traces is also a common working method, which can provide an intuitive reference for supervision and inspection. However, if you just "write by hand for the sake of handwriting" and "leave a mark for the sake of leaving a trace", it completely deviates from the original intention of assigning the task, and will only increase the workload. In order to cope with things, some people pondered some "skills", such as "big words" and "finding someone to copy on behalf of them" and so on. The popularity of "writing robots" is actually a ridiculous "soft resistance" to formalism.

Formalism is deeply hated by everyone, and many measures have been introduced to curb it, but it has always been difficult to eradicate it. As far as "handwriting traces" is concerned, it has been complained about before, but the inertia of some units to accumulate materials and pile up notes still exists. In the final analysis, it is it that "smells bad and tastes good".

Writing robot "artifact", has it defeated formalism?

To greet the inspection of superiors, present a thick pile of materials, full of handwritten notes, and neat documents, creating a sense of "arrangement, deployment, and effect", which can instantly impress people, and it is easier to get "praise" and "high scores". For superiors, supervising and inspecting the materials can see the "implementation process", which can be described as easy and labor-saving. To put it bluntly, the prevalence of formalism is behind the lazy government. Ignoring the basic rules of work and only working the scene will not only make the real people tired, but also may destroy the good working atmosphere.

It is not easy to clean up formalism, but no matter how difficult it is, it is necessary to "go under the knife". Realizing that there are too many "handwritten notes", some schools have taken the initiative to seek changes, stipulating that teachers can modify or annotate on the printed version of the group lesson plan. Some grassroots cadres also suggested that the popularization of the law should not be limited to "copying the law", and that using cases to explain the law can better promote the understanding of the mind.

Only by taking concrete and concrete measures to resolve air-to-air formalism can we help the mission return to its original intention. Of course, the most important thing is to abandon grandstanding and insist on seeking truth from facts. Say goodbye to "talking on paper", free grassroots cadres from "copying notes", and devote more time to entrepreneurship, why worry about not having thick and full political achievements?

Graphic and text comprehensive source network, sharing this article is intended to convey more valuable information. With thousands of book elites, let's explore a new way of life in China's calligraphy, painting and printing! The original text does not represent the views, positions and value judgments of the Calligraphy Commune. If you have any questions about the content, copyright, or other questions of the work, please contact the Book Art Commune.

Writing robot "artifact", has it defeated formalism?

Welcome|Connect

To contribute to the article, please contact: xshufa activity report, please contact: shiyu798 to join the community of Shuyi Commune, please contact: xshufa business and marketing cooperation, please contact: shiyu798

Writing robot "artifact", has it defeated formalism?

At the end of browsing, remember to follow @Shuyi Commune to watch more valuable articles in time

Read on