After two years, AMD officially lifted the ban on the new APU Ryzen 8000 series and 8XXXG series yesterday.
You must know that APU has a lot of audiences in the DIY market, and there are also a lot of people who pay attention to it. In addition, the previous marketing has always been the strongest nuclear display, and the second kill XX50 and the like have increased everyone's expectations for it.
Snail also watched some big UP main debut reviews.,After reading it, one word:Confused,Next, snail will talk to you about the snail's feelings after watching the big UP review.。
A total of four APUs were released this time, of which 8300G and 8500G direct PASS did not exist. Everyone's attention is basically on the R5 8600G and R7 8700G two U.
So today Snail only introduces these two.
The snail mainly watched the two with the largest number of broadcasts on station B, as well as the evaluation of the super energy network as a supplement. The following data is taken from the video.
1. Processor performance
In terms of processor performance, Uncle Tony only listed the R23's running score and did not compare, FUN Technology made a comparison. The snail captures the contrast.
The R7 8700G is the stunt of the R7 7840HS, and there is no doubt that there is almost no difference between the two except for the multiple NPU units and the difference in power consumption.
Performance comparison
Although TS CPU is not a very professional CPU evaluation, it also has a certain reference value, which is mainly to test the multi-core performance of the processor.
Here is a comparison of the super energy networkR23,The conclusion is that the performance of this U is very poor in short,8700G is definitely not a castrated version of 7700。 Truth be told, the pure CPU performance of the R5 8600G and R7 8700G is pretty lazy.
Regarding the performance of these two CPUs, most UP masters are actually still secretive, because there is really nothing to brag about.
2. Processor defects
Except that the performance of the processor is a cut below that of its brothers of the same specifications, it is still castrated in invisible places.
The conventional does not support PCIE5.0、Only support PCIE4.0X8,The third-level cache is only half of 7700,This basic UP master has mentioned,In short, it is a word,It is not recommended to use this U with a slightly better graphics card。 Supernet even tested the 7700 and 8700g with 4090, and the conclusion was that this U with 4090 is not recommended.
3. Core display performance
It doesn't matter what processor performance and what castration about the APU, because this is true for each generation. The performance of the nuclear display is the most important, and the running scores of the three companies that the snail looks at on the default theory are basically the same.
The three are theoretically 8700G and there is still a very big gap between the 8700G core display and the 1650. But after all, 1650 are all on the last generation of graphics cards,In terms of optimization and the latest core graphics ratio,You must not just look at the theory,Everyone is most concerned about the actual game。
This is also the part that snails don't understand the most, because the reviews are different.
Tony's first,After reading it, I only think 1650 is a garbage card,Tony's game compared to pbug and big cousin2,1650 is slightly ahead of the normal 8700g,But it is still over 3400mhz memory over 8400mhz8700ghanging。 (refers to OC) other games basically can't beat 8700g, and after reading it, I think 8700g is so strong.
And after reading FUN Technology
The snail is TONY first, and then FUN technology, the contrast is not too big. In the old 3A and online games, 1650 is definitely a dimensionality reduction blow. In the new 3A and A card optimization games, it is 8700g ahead. In the end, the conclusion of FUN Technology is basically that it is five or five open (from the test, 1650 actually has a greater chance of winning), but this is based on the premise that the memory exceeds 8000. The Super Network did not compare the test of 1650, so I won't talk about it.
After reading the two comparisons,A little incomprehensible to the performance of 8700g,If the test results of the different games above are different, it is understandable,But on the 2077 game,The two UP also gave different comparisons。
Tony's 2077 comparison
1650 was even beaten by 8600g by default.
And look at FUN technology
The 1650 direct counter-kill 8700G is even 1 frame lower than the 8700G of the super 8000 memory. The same game, the same resolution, of course, the picture quality settings are not the same, but the contrast gap is so big, the snail really can't understand it.
Combining these three, Snail wants to share his views with everyone. First of all, the performance of these two U's is much lower than that of the non-APU versions of 7600 and 7700, plus the castration of cache and channels, if you want to change to a good graphics card in the future, don't consider it. However, compared to the 7000 Ryzen memory overclocking, it is more stable. Regarding the core display, the latest 3A masterpiece is basically ahead of 1650 with the blessing of ultra-high frequency memory, especially above 2k (if you have to use the core graphics to play 2K). But under the online game and some A black and old 3A, 1650 is actually more than a little stronger.
It can be said that this is 8700g is the strongest core graphics processor on the desktop at present, but if you say that you are beating 1650, unless everyone is like Tony, the memory is over 8400, and the core graphics frequency is over 3400, it is really a hanging. But if it defaults to 6000, it's really different who is beaten by whom.
Although it has not been officially released yet, the price has almost been revealed, in short, it is very expensive, and it is not cost-effective at present.
This issue of the snail is actually to talk to you about 8700g and 8600g what it is like, FUN technology and TONY snail are often seen, most players of TONY toss are impossible to toss, FUN technology test is relatively closer to daily use, as for the existence of data is different, snail guess may be caused by the difference in processor choice. 8700g and 8600g core display is very strong,But don't myth it,What hangs 1650,There is even something beyond 1060,You must know that 1060 is much stronger than 1650,It's not a game that's strong.
At present, the reality is that there is no desktop core display that can beat the 1650, let alone the 1060. It's just that many people don't want to believe that the comprehensive transcendence (running score + online game transcendence) 1650 can only hope for the next generation.