On January 23, 2024, the Duli People's Court of the Sanyuan Court successfully mediated a special sales contract dispute case, and under the careful mediation of the undertaking judge, the defendant paid part of the payment in court, and the two parties reached an agreement and the case was satisfactorily resolved.
Details of the case
Plaintiff Sun Moumou and defendant Luo Moumou reached an oral agreement, the plaintiff supplied coffins and other longevity materials to the place designated by the defendant, and the defendant paid for the goods, and agreed to only supply to the defendant in the defendant's village. During the cooperation period, the plaintiff and the defendant signed and confirmed the supply order every time the plaintiff supplied goods. However, in May 2021, the plaintiff supplied coffins and other longevity materials to other longevity material operators in the defendant's same village, causing the defendant's business to be bad, and the defendant was dissatisfied with the plaintiff's behavior, so the plaintiff owed 14,000 yuan and refused to return it. Therefore, the plaintiff sued the court.
Judge
After understanding, the presiding judge found that the plaintiff and the defendant had been good friends, the facts of this case were clear and clear, and the failure to pay the arrears this time was not an economic reason, so he wanted to resolve the conflict between the two parties through mediation. The judge first found the two parties to communicate, patiently listened to the opinions of both parties, found the crux of the problem, patiently and meticulously did the ideological work of both parties from the perspective of reason and legal theory, and analyzed the pros and cons. In the end, the two parties reached an agreement, and the defendant paid half of the purchase price in court, and the relationship between the two eased. The plaintiff and the defendant reached a mediation agreement, and the defendant paid the remaining payment to the plaintiff before the end of February 2024.
The Duli People's Court has always adhered to the judicial concept of "people-centered", doing good deeds, handling facts, and solving difficulties for the people. Efforts should be made to solve the most concerning, most direct, and most realistic problems of the people, to achieve "the case is closed, the matter is settled, and the people are reconciled", and the fundamental purpose of justice for the people is practiced with practical actions.
(Source: Mihara Court)