In this Qatar Asian Cup, the Chinese team successfully kicked the Asian Cup out of the feeling of participating in the World Cup. In three games, the national football team has achieved a record of 2 draws and 1 loss, and failed to score a goal. This is also the worst record in the history of the Chinese men's football team since participating in the Asian Cup, and head coach Jankovic's tactics and selection have been questioned. Whether Jankovic should leave class has become a hot topic of public opinion for a while.
There is no doubt that the level of the national football team is indeed not high, so a considerable part of public opinion believes that with the current level of the Chinese men's football team, it is useless to change any coach, and it is difficult for a clever woman to cook without rice. It was not coach Jankovic who delayed the national football team, but the national football team pulled Jankovic down. If that's the case, there is no such thing as a high-level coach or an average coach in the world of football. Our requirements for the national football team are not high, and even we just hope that the lower limit of the national football team is not too low.
For a team's coach, like a skilled player, he should know how to get the most out of his cards. A high-level coach is able to cohesive a mediocre team and put in an amazing performance in the game, even if the players are not at the top.
A high-level coach can also transform it into combat effectiveness, which is why there will be upset games on the field where the weak beat the strong, only from the strength of the paper alone, the weak team has no chance of winning, and the reason for the victory is that the team coach has deployed the team's offense and defense by studying the opponent. There is no doubt that the national football team is facing Lebanon and Tajikistan, which are far below their own in the world rankings, and Tajikistan is passive, with zero goals in three games, and it has to be said that Jankovic's lineup has a big problem.
Of course, we can't just put the blame on Jankovic. Injuries to players, some key decisions from referees, the state of key players, and the strength of opponents are all important factors that affect the outcome of the game. But as a head coach, Jankovic's professionalism and coaching ability will undoubtedly need to stand the test. China's defeat in the Asian Cup was due to a number of reasons, but Jankovic, as the head coach, must take responsibility for the defeat from a technical or professional level.
It would not be surprising if the Chinese Football Association fired Jankovic because of this. After all, football performance is one of the important criteria for measuring the quality of coaching. It's just that there is really not much time left for the Chinese men's football team now, and we have finished the task of the Asian Cup. The next game for the national football team is the World Preliminary Tournament in March, and if there are problems in the two World Preliminary Matches against Singapore in March, Chinese football will only fall deeper and deeper into the abyss. The question now is who will take over if we choose to replace Jankovic? Before the start of the Asian Cup, the Chinese Football Association has no intention of changing the coach, and if the foreign coach is temporarily looking for a foreign coach and does not know the level of the Chinese players, who has the ability and willingness to take over at the same time?
To live or to perish, this is the question that Hamlet encounters. Whether to change the head coach quickly is a problem encountered by the Chinese Football Association. Now it is an important watershed in Chinese football, and it is also a time to test the strategic vision of decision-makers, so do you think the national football team should change the head coach? Welcome to leave a message in the comment area to express your views.