Who is stronger at 30 points or 35 points per game? Harden was overlooked, and the results surprised you!
In the NBA, the mecca of basketball, scoring ability has always been extremely admired and pursued. When we talk about scoring, we often see players averaging 30 or 35 points per game, so between these two numbers, who is more representative of a player's scoring ability? Is the player who averages 30 points per game stronger, or the player who averages 35 points per game is better? Let's find out today!
First, we need to understand what these two numbers mean. Avgaging 30 points per game means that a player can score 30 points per game, while averaging 35 points per game means that a player can score 35 points per game. Numerically, 35 points is 5 points more than 30 points, and these 5 points are a real difference! So, intuitively, players who average 35 points per game have a stronger ability to score.
However, it's not that simple. We can't ignore the playing time of the players and the quality of the opposition. The more minutes a player plays and the more defensive pressure he faces, the more difficult it will be for him to get a high score. So, when comparing these two numbers, we need to weigh these factors.
Let's look at the example of Harden. Harden is one of the NBA's leading scorers, and he has excellent scoring ability and high scoring efficiency. However, he didn't average 35 points per game. This is because he often chooses to pass the ball in the game for the sake of the team's victory, rather than blindly chasing high scores. Although this choice has reduced his personal average points per game, it has improved the team's overall combat effectiveness.
So, when we compare an average of 30 points per game to an average of 35 points per game, we can't just look at the size of the number. We need to take into account the playing time of the players, the quality of the opponents, the wins and losses of the game, etc. Only in this way can we more accurately evaluate a player's scoring ability.
Of course, there are many players in the history of the NBA who have averaged 30+ or even 35+ points per game. But they all differ in how they score, in segments, and for what purpose. Some people prefer to go it alone and score points in a row, while others are more adept at using teamwork to get easy scoring opportunities through movement and playmaking. There is no absolute good or bad between these two ways, it just depends on the needs of the team and the characteristics of the players.
Finally, I would like to say that whether it is 30 points per game or 35 points per game, it represents a player's excellent scoring ability. And a true superstar is not only judged by his scoring ability, but also by his other performances in the game, such as defense, organization, leadership, and so on. Only well-rounded players can truly become legends in the NBA.
In short, there is really no fixed answer to the question of who is stronger with 30 points or 35 points per game. Scoring is just one aspect of a player's ability. We have to look at a player's performance holistically, not just his scoring stats. Only in this way can we truly appreciate the charm of the NBA, the mecca of basketball!