Dian Wei Xu Chu is about the same, and Yan Liang added points because of the 20 quick defeat of Xu Huang Wen Chou because of the 3 rounds of cowardice in the super-first-class generals, Guan Zhang Zhao Ma I think there is no obvious gap, everyone has their own highlight record, Guan Yu Zhang Fei is not necessarily greater than Zhao Yun Ma Chao, Zhang He's record can be seen, Ma Chao 20 quick defeat, Zhao Yun 30 together, Zhang Fei is thirty or fifty without winning or losing, but Zhang Fei and Ma Chao fought more than 200 times without winning or losing, it can only be said that the super-first-class generals have their own characteristics, but I think Wen Chou is the most stretched, no matter what the strength is as a fierce general The 3 rounds of cowardice are too good。
And Huang Zhong is actually underrated... Huang Zhong's combat power is clearly described by a narrator and has been declining. From the bow of 3 stones to the bow of 2 stones, there is still a thousand catties of power, and to the bow of 2 stones, it still seems to have the power of a thousand catties, which clearly tells you the description of a straight line. Using Xiahou Yuan to comment on Changsha Huang Zhong is clearly unequal. Huang Zhong's highest light battle in Changsha is the strength of the pure Five Tigers, and he does not lose to Guan Zhang Zhaoma. Huang Zhong beat Guan Yu 100% of the draw, Huang Zhong didn't use the hidden weapon first, no matter what, he was nailed to the draw. This is not the strength of Huang Zhong, a young man who has not been written. There is no problem in front of Xu Chu. Xu Chu's high light is very different from Huang Zhongyuan. Xu Chu is a disadvantage to the four tigers (Zhao Yun once in Runan, Guan Yu once in Xiapi, Zhang Fei once in Hanzhong, and Ma Chao in Chang'an first) Huang Zhong at least tied Guan Yu.