Recently, the American Alumni Association of Fudan University discovered an alumnus Sun Dongwei who had been wandering in the United States for many years, and organized forces to contact and help, with the aim of allowing Sun Dongwei to return to China for retirement. The move sparked widespread discussion on the Internet, with many netizens expressing anger and incomprehension at the behavior of these Americans. But we need to look at this event dialectically before we can make a moral judgment.
It is undeniable that Sun Dongwei himself does have something unforgivable. After he was selected to study abroad, he turned his back on the country, and after he arrived in the United States, he became a naturalized student and gave up his Chinese nationality. When his parents died, he ignored them and became addicted to gambling and owed huge debts. These behaviors are disappointing for him.
The People's Republic does not accept backers!
In the tank. Betrayal must bear the price of betrayal, and there should be a "release effect", otherwise I will be sorry for the national people who have a fist and a heart for China.
What has he done for the country? He still wants the country to provide for him? The path he has chosen will be completed with some ambition even if he starves to death
If China and the United States go to war, he, as an American, will of course aim at his enemies.
When I was young and middle-aged, I was loyal to the United States, but when I was old and sick, I wanted to return to China to support the elderly?
In the same way, we need to be rational and tolerant when we look at those Americans. First of all, they did want to help a compatriot in distress out of humanitarian considerations. Second, they may also have the consideration of using Sun Dongwei's return to China for their own benefit. But such considerations are not heinous, because it is natural to strike a balance between individual and collective interests.
Therefore, we should not simplify this event and look at all participants in a pan-moralistic light. Human nature is inherently complex, and everyone has their own difficulties in different situations. We need to be tolerant and understanding of the participants while having a correct understanding of the event. Only in this way can we not fall into the exemplary thinking of moral criticism, but make moral judgments in the true sense.