Behind this Taiwan election campaign, there are more invisible minds, and a series of actions and statements on the political stage seem to have become a subtle political wrestling, which makes people wonder whether this is just a superficial election campaign, or is there a more profound conspiracy and strategy behind it?
It seems that Lai Qingde's intention for a showdown seems to be to counter a possible future crisis in the Taiwan Strait, while Zhao Shaokang called on the mainland to exercise restraint at this tense moment in order to ease cross-strait relations. The statements made by these politicians make people ponder whether they are genuine worries or political tactics, and whether this election campaign is just a prelude to a big drama, we may need to think more deeply.
In this election campaign, Taiwan's defense department has issued a document to all circles demanding the signing of an agreement on stockpiling ammunition; is this unprecedented preparation aimed at dealing with external threats or to create an image of war preparedness during the election campaign? This question requires us to think deeply and reveal the strategic intent behind it.
Between the words, Lai Qingde's team once again emphasized "rejecting reunification and seeking independence" and made it clear that Taiwan will not accept peaceful reunification. Does this kind of statement really mean that Taiwan is ready to deal with everything, or is it just a statement on the political stage? We need to make a more prudent analysis of this kind of rhetoric.
Zhao Yixiang's remarks reveal the DPP's position. He said that the DPP's job is to push back the time point of reunification, and whether this is just to win more space or to escape the general trend of history? This is a question worth pondering.
However, Zhao's appeal appears more rational at this tense moment. Is his proposal to "exercise restraint" just a diplomatic rhetoric or a genuine expectation for maintaining regional stability? This may require us to discern his true intentions. The balance and stability of cross-strait relations require the joint efforts of both sides, rational thinking, and sober action.
At this juncture, rumors of possible action by the PLA are also uncertain. Is this a response to certain political forces, or is it an attempt to send a certain signal to the outside world? Will cross-strait relations really undergo earth-shaking changes because of the election of a certain political figure? This requires us to go beyond the surface and pay attention to the essential motive force of cross-strait relations.
Perhaps, in this political drama, we need to look farther and think deeper. The development of cross-strait relations should not only be constrained by the results of an election, but should also pay attention to common long-term interests. In this turbulent time, we need more cold thinking and rational expression in order to achieve a stable and peaceful future.