laitimes

In the post-mobile phone era, Chinese and Mi people are pressing forward step by step, how to break the situation with OV?

The X7 surpasses Xiaomi in terms of price-performance ratio!

The Find X7 series was released today. Surprisingly, this time there is no Pro, only the standard version and Ultra. In OPPO's words, the reason why we don't do the Pro version is because the standard version is beyond the existence of the Pro. The last time I heard this sentence, it was at the press conference of OnePlus 12, and it was the same rhetoric at the time, OnePlus 12 can surpass the Pro of its friends.

In the post-mobile phone era, Chinese and Mi people are pressing forward step by step, how to break the situation with OV?

To be honest, OPPO's two new machines today can play one more than the other, and the price is also quite powerful. Take the standard version of the 3999 as an example, there is no problem in beating the Xiaomi 14 released some time ago. At the same price, OPPO is even more cost-effective than Xiaomi, is Xiaomi changed, or OPPO has changed. In fact, everything has changed, but Xiaomi has taken a small step in the direction of moving away from cost performance, and OPPO has taken a big step in the direction of approaching cost performance.

In the post-mobile phone era, Chinese and Mi people are pressing forward step by step, how to break the situation with OV?

What kind of game did OV break?

This step, OPPO had to take a step. Everyone may have watched today's press conference, and it is not an exaggeration to say that OPPO has taken out the ability to press the bottom of the box. also take out all the skills to press the bottom of the box, as well as vivo. Counting the new machines released by OV recently, it is not difficult for us to find that both are rolling. The most intuitive manifestation is that periscope telephoto, something that other flagship machines may not be equipped with, ov from mid-range machines to high-end machines, from sub-brands to parent brands, are all paved.

In the post-mobile phone era, Chinese and Mi people are pressing forward step by step, how to break the situation with OV?

OV no longer cares about the homogenization between different products, and the ruthless heap configuration may be the only way for them to break the game. Speaking of which, the question finally comes out, why does OV want to break the game, and what kind of game is it breaking? The answer is that if OV does not break the game, it may be others, and it is the dead game jointly laid by Huawei and Xiaomi.

In the post-mobile phone era, Chinese and Mi people are pressing forward step by step, how to break the situation with OV?

The data of the fourth quarter of the OV is ugly, and it is difficult to see to what extent? The domestic market share of the two companies has dropped from 20% at the peak to less than 13%, which is the reason behind the seemingly crazy operation of the OV in the fourth quarter, but it is not the reason.

Huami and Xiaomi make both keys and locks!

In my opinion, the whole ecology of people, cars and homes created by Huawei and Xiaomi is the post-mobile phone era. In the post-mobile era, mobile phones are no longer a tool for communication, entertainment, or shopping. Rather, it is a key that opens your whole ecological life, and this key can only open a specific lock, and a specific lock can only be opened by this key.

Huawei and Xiaomi's lock has made its own achievements, this lock is the car, it is the smart home. Although Huawei does not make cars, some of its own car companies are willing to work for Huawei through the export of solutions and technologies. Huawei's car is not like Huawei's car, and now it has achieved a small success.

In the post-mobile phone era, Chinese and Mi people are pressing forward step by step, how to break the situation with OV?

Xiaomi's approach is different from Huawei's, Xiaomi builds its own factories and cars, and firmly controls the entire link in its own hands. It's hard to say which of the two options has more advantages, but it's certain that there are advantages over those without.

And OV, that is, the one that has no plan. OV doesn't build cars, it didn't build in the past, it doesn't build it now, and it probably won't build it in the future. We don't know what the internal planning of the OV is like, but it may not be a particularly good decision for the OV not to build a car.

In the post-mobile phone era, Chinese and Mi people are pressing forward step by step, how to break the situation with OV?

The torrent of the times is rolling forward, and any enterprise must adapt to the development of the times. How Baidu, one of the three giants of BAT, is in decline now, ov knows better than us.

Broken OV

Until now, we have not seen a single word spread from the top of the OV about future planning. What we can see is that OV is head-to-head roll up the configuration of the phone. This year's ov, especially the Q4's ov, has crushed Huawei in terms of cost performance and surpassed Xiaomi. I think this may be the only way they can go at the moment, to break the kettle in the mobile phone market. If it happens, the market share of mobile phones will return, and you will be able to free up your hands to lay out other things, as for why you didn't lay out in advance? I think this has to ask the OV executives.

In the post-mobile phone era, Chinese and Mi people are pressing forward step by step, how to break the situation with OV?

But whether it succeeds or not, whether the market accepts the OV of the broken kettle depends on the will of God...

(End of article)

Read on