Internet celebrities exposed the rich Xie Kefeng in arrears of wages
On January 7, a netizen broke the news on social media and caused an uproar. Netizens "laughed at life and were confused" claimed that he was engaged in vegetable wholesale and sanitation cleaning in the company in the summer, but he was fired for unknown reasons and owed 360 yuan in wages.
This revelation instantly attracted widespread attention, and netizens went to comment under the Jiejia account to ask the truth of the matter.
Xie Kefeng's company denied arrears of wages, and Xie Qingdong, the company's president, clarified
Xie Qingdong responded immediately after seeing this revelation, saying that the netizen was not hired by the company. Xie Qingdong said that the company provided food and lodging and paid 100 yuan for three days, claiming that the employee did not officially go to work at that time.
However, this response did not calm public opinion, and netizens always had doubts about the incident and questioned Xie Kefeng's company.
Netizens disagree: supporters believe that unsuitable employees should not be hired, and critics insist that they should be responsible for delaying wages
As the incident unfolded, two camps emerged on social media. Some netizens believe that Xie Kefeng's recruitment has its own standards, and unsuitable employees should be rejected for hiring;
Other netizens believe that it is the company's responsibility to delay the payment of wages, regardless of whether they are hired or not. This disagreement has led to a whirlpool of public opinion and escalating controversies.
Xie Qingdong counterattacked: the company is not responsible, and the other party is welcome to sue
Xie Qingdong once again stated his position in his response, emphasizing that the company was not responsible for this incident. He said that the company welcomes the other party to resolve the dispute through legal means, and made it clear that the company will not compromise due to the pressure of public opinion. This hardline attitude has led to more discussion, with some agreeing with its insistence and others expressing disgust at its indifference.
Public opinion doubts: The authenticity of the incident is doubtful
As the events unfolded, some observers began to question the authenticity of the entire incident. They pointed out that Xie Kefeng's dismissal and the claims of unpaid wages did not appear to be consistent, raising doubts about whether other factors had not been revealed.
At the same time, some netizens began to worry that such incidents may bring employment uncertainty to job seekers and have a negative impact on the entire recruitment market.
Solution: It is recommended that the company strengthen employee management and improve the recruitment process
Under the continuous pressure of public opinion, some professionals have put forward suggestions. They believe that the key to resolving such incidents is for companies to strengthen their management of employees and ensure that the recruitment process is fair and transparent.
This may reduce the frequency of similar disputes and maintain the company's image.
This may be just the tip of the iceberg, and job seekers need to choose employers carefully
The final outcome of the incident has not yet been revealed, but it is undeniable that this incident has aroused social attention to the management of the wealthy Xie Kefeng's company.
Job seekers may need to be more cautious in choosing their employers to avoid potential employment risks. The strong reaction from public opinion also shows that companies need to be more cautious in hiring and management to avoid affecting the overall reputation due to individual incidents.