I have not seriously examined who first invented the term "verbal laborer" and when it was invented.
But I know that this word was used half a year ago by the old scientist Mr. He Zuoxiu to rebuke General Sima.
Personally, I think that the five words of "oral laborers" are summarized very incisively, and in my mind, there are three main representatives of oral laborers: one is General Sima in He Zuoxiu's mouth;
One of the most basic characteristics of a verbal worker is that he is rhetorical and has a head on the road. But when you take their articles, speeches, and videos into account, you find that they don't have any real significance, or strictly speaking, they don't mean much to reality, at least very little.
For example, I often listen to Mr. Zhang's videos as jokes, and I am grouped with Guo Degang, which is to please and make fun of readers and audiences. As for whether it has a real guiding effect on candidates, I personally think it is of little significance.
For example, our middle school teachers tell jokes in class every day, although they can make students laugh, but if you think about it, is it really meaningful for children to take the exam?
I just saw a piece of news, that is, Mr. Zhang was sued and filed a case.
And I remember the origin and origin of this incident very clearly: it happened a few months ago, and Mr. Zhang said in the video that liberal arts students are licking and serving industries.
Obviously, his remarks are to look down on liberal arts students. So is there any truth to what he said? Personally, I don't think it makes sense. Let's think about it, from Tang and Song poems to the four famous novels, and then to the current social management, if there are no liberal arts and liberal arts students, then, what will our society become?
Turn on the TV and turn on the phone, and a lot of the content we see, especially the content related to literature and art, is mostly done by liberal arts students. Without liberal arts and liberal arts students, our world would have changed from color to black and white.
Therefore, as a liberal arts student, I am against and disgusted by Mr. Zhang's remarks.
I do not deny that this blogger sued Mr. Zhang for hype and sensationalism, but on the merits, Mr. Zhang's remarks are indeed inappropriate, and I have always expressed my opposition to Mr. Zhang's open-mouthedness.
Therefore, I support the blogger's lawsuit. What do you think about this? Welcome to leave a message in the comment area to discuss.