laitimes

The live-in boyfriend passed away, and the woman unjustly enriched more than 100 yuan, and the court ruled to return it.

author:Iron Child's notes
The live-in boyfriend passed away, and the woman unjustly enriched more than 100 yuan, and the court ruled to return it.

#I want to be on the headlines##See each other in the headlines##头条创作挑战赛#

Graphic editor: Iron Boy

Recently, the Chongqing Dadukou District People's Court heard a case of unjust enrichment dispute, which raised concerns about the issue of inheritance rights under a long-term cohabitation relationship without formal registration. In this case, after the sudden death of his live-in boyfriend Huang, the defendant Yang used Huang's mobile phone to transfer more than 100 yuan to his bank account without authorization, and the court finally ruled that the money was unjust enrichment and should be returned.
The live-in boyfriend passed away, and the woman unjustly enriched more than 100 yuan, and the court ruled to return it.

The court investigation found that after Huang and his ex-wife divorced, they did not officially marry again, but lived together with his girlfriend Yang Moumou for a long time in the name of husband and wife since 2000. However, after Huang's death, his huge estate became the focus. Huang did not leave a will, and the legal heirs include his daughter Huang Xiaomou and his mother in her 80s. However, after Huang's death, Yang used Huang's mobile phone to transfer more than 100 yuan without authorization, triggering the court's intervention.

The live-in boyfriend passed away, and the woman unjustly enriched more than 100 yuan, and the court ruled to return it.

During the trial, Yang asserted that he and Huang had formally formed a husband and wife relationship and had lived together for more than 20 years, so they should enjoy the inheritance rights of the legal husband and wife relationship. She also mentioned that the two run the gallery together and earn money, so she should be entitled to inherit Huang's estate. However, the court held that Yang and Huang were not in a de facto marriage and failed to provide sufficient evidence to prove that they jointly operated the gallery, and finally ruled that the deposit she transferred without authorization was unjust enrichment and should be returned to the legal heirs.

The live-in boyfriend passed away, and the woman unjustly enriched more than 100 yuan, and the court ruled to return it.

In this case, the court made it clear that common-law is not equivalent to a de facto marriage and that certain conditions are required to require a person other than an heir to have the right to inherit. The requirement of joint business in a cohabitation relationship is supported by sufficient evidence, such as reciprocal and complementary joint business activities. Overall, this precedent provides a clear legal perspective for similar cases, emphasizing the legal basis and proof requirements for inheritance.

Previous Articles:

In 1865, Agubo led his troops to invade Xinjiang: Britain and Russia joined forces to support the split, and Zuo Zongtang recovered Xinjiang

The First Sino-Japanese War broke out: In 1894, Japan attacked and the flames of war between China and Japan were ignited

The First Unequal Treaty in Modern Chinese History: Interpreting the Sino-British Treaty of Nanking in 1842

About the Author:

Tie Gongzi, a post-80s Internet operator, is deeply involved in the field of self-media writing + industry, independent design + senior main case + interaction design, pay attention to [Tie Gongzi Notes] Let's learn and grow Xi together~