"The host of Nandao ridiculed the Japanese disaster and was suspended" was unexpected. The well-known host of the South Island ridiculed the disaster of Japan and suffered the crime of involvement, how surprised is the world?
The world can't help but sigh, but the reckless people can't help but make noise, and those who don't understand humor are rare. Although the presiding remarks are inappropriate, why should they be directly suspended from their posts on this ground? They should be corrected instead of being held accountable for their crimes. And the world is going down,
How can freedom of speech be abolished because of a single word? Isn't it a temporary mistake to host a joke about disasters? Is it true that no one in the world has a sense of humor? Not to mention the South Island, looking at the world, how can freedom of speech be restricted because of a single word?
The presiding officer may be inappropriate, but why should he be so harsh? Isn't it a trivial matter? Analyze a specific detail of the incident: The presiding officer made fun of the Japanese disaster and caused controversy. However, it is interesting that the number of Xiao Cheng's fans has skyrocketed,
The strong support of netizens cannot be ignored. At the same time, the South Korean side did not realize that it also severely criticized Japan. All these things make people think. Personal opinion on the matter: Freedom of expression should be respected, but speech should also be done with caution. The host may have lost his words,
However, the suspension is excessive. Only when the majority of netizens support it can we see the injustice of this matter. Summary of golden sentences: This matter may wish to cause deep thought. It may be inappropriate to preside over the speech, but it should not be regarded as a crime. If you are not careful, you should change it, and you should not take it as a crime.
May the world ponder it. Welcome to leave a comment to discuss this matter together.