Just now, when I was brushing the headlines, I came across an article by the Financial Associated Press. The article said that the new regulations that brokerages are not allowed to lend securities on restricted shares require customers to revise contracts or sign letters of commitment.
Netizens said: It's really too much thinking, if the promise is useful, then what do you need rules for?
This netizen said, is the letter of commitment useful? Isn't this here to be funny?
The netizen downstairs said that it is better to open all the restricted shares, fully circulate, and then finance them as they please. It is also said that restricted shares can be borrowed and lended, and there is no significance of restricted shares at all, and it is better to implement full circulation.
3、
This netizen also joked, where are the limited shares? are all fully circulated, and now are you ready to start playing language games?
This netizen in Shanghai said, I once promised that I would not gamble again in the future, but I didn't expect that after a value investment, I lost without any bottoms. No chance, no chance at all.
This netizen in Shanghai also said, what about the letter of commitment, what should I do if I violate the rules? Will I be fined three glasses of wine? Why don't you start directly from the source and lock the operation directly?
The netizen downstairs also said that our stock market is the same as our football, and strange things are endless.
I've been in the stock market for a few years, and I really haven't encountered anything that feels good. It's like the saying, all the rules and regulations are for the rich.
What do you think about the fact that restricted shares are not allowed to be borrowed and borrowed? Welcome to leave a message in the comment area to discuss:
#文章首发挑战赛#