In a fierce matchup between the Fujian men's basketball team and the Tianjin men's basketball team, the referee's penalty scale caused huge controversy. Fujian coach Zhu Shilong was dissatisfied with the referee's punishment, lost control of his emotions, spoke fiercely, and acted excessively, and directly smashed the referee angrily with the tactical board, and the others couldn't pull it, which affected the normal progress of the game. This incident has attracted the attention and discussion of the majority of fans, and at the same time, it has also made people question the scale of the punishment of mainland basketball referees.
In this game, Zhu Shilong questioned the referee's punishment for the same behavior of the Fujian team, believing that the referee's punishment for the Fujian team's physical violation was too harsh, while the similar behavior of the opposing player was only an ordinary foul. This kind of differential treatment of light sentences and heavy sentences made Zhu Shilong extremely dissatisfied. In fact, this inconsistency in the scale of punishment has become a major point of controversy in basketball games.
There have been a number of controversial decisions in previous games. The accumulation of these controversial judgments has raised questions about the impartiality of the adjudication. Zhu Shilong's emotional out-of-control this time is just a concentrated outbreak of this problem. In this regard, many media people predict that Zhu Shilong will face additional penalties, and penalties such as bans and fines are unavoidable.
The root of the problem does not lie in Zhu Shilong's personal behavior, but in the punishment scale of mainland basketball referees. If the referee can be fair, fair and open in the game, then similar incidents can be completely avoided. Therefore, the mainland basketball community should take this opportunity to reform the selection, training, and assessment of referees, improve the overall level of referees, and ensure the fairness of the game.
Not long ago, Yao Ming and Xu Jicheng, among other veterans of Chinese basketball, hosted a press conference in which referees representing CBA clubs were criticized or warned for their decisions. Yao Ming focused on the issue of referees, admitting the pressure of referees to enforce the law, and he also elaborated on the interference of fan slogans and the complex factors that referees need to think about when making instantaneous judgments. However, despite Yao Ming's appeal, it is still not possible to fully resolve the issue of the referee's decision. This season, referees have been the subject of much controversy, and fans have shifted their focus to refereeing decisions, focusing on player dissatisfaction, coach distress, and referee misdecisions and missed decisions. Despite this, the referee did not accept the appropriate punishment and continued to participate in the game, causing controversy again. The repeated phenomenon is worrying, lest it affect the image of the Chinese Basketball League.
The problem of basketball referees in China has been a problem for a long time, and Yao Ming's appeal has only once again brought the issue into the public eye. In a game, the referee's decision directly affects the direction and outcome of the game, so the impartiality and professionalism of the referee is crucial. However, in reality, there are many problems in the enforcement of referees, such as unfair punishments, lax law enforcement, and improper attitudes. These problems not only caused dissatisfaction among the players and coaches, but also caused fans to lose confidence in the game.
Yao Ming stressed at the press conference that referees need to remain calm under pressure and be fair, fair and open. He also said that the level of law enforcement of referees is directly related to the development of Chinese basketball, so the relevant departments need to strengthen the training and supervision of referees. In addition, Yao Ming also mentioned the interference of fan slogans, calling on fans to look at the game rationally and respect the referee's decision.
Yao Ming's appeal was not responded to effectively in a short period of time. This season, the referee problem is still prominent, and even worse. In some games, the referee's misjudgment and omission caused strong dissatisfaction among fans and even led to chaos in the field. Under the pressure of referees, the level of law enforcement has not been improved, but there have been some phenomena of "dare not blow, will not blow". This phenomenon not only bothered players and coaches, but also made fans question the image of the Chinese Basketball League.
In the face of the issue of adjudication, the relevant departments need to take practical and effective measures. First of all, strengthen the training of referees and improve their law enforcement level. Second, establish a sound referee evaluation, reward and punishment mechanism, and conduct real-time supervision of the law enforcement of referees. Finally, he called on fans to look at the game rationally, respect the referee's judgment, and jointly maintain the order of the stadium.
With the poor record of the Chinese men's basketball team in the World Cup and Asian Cup, the disappointment of the outside world in the CBA is growing. However, this disappointment is not only due to the decline in results, but also to the unsatisfactory performance of the best local players in continental competitions. Behind this, there are hidden doubts and dissatisfaction with the referee's penalty scale and game control.
The issue of referees has always been a point of contention in the CBA league. In the game, the referee's penalty scale, law enforcement level and game control ability directly affect the fairness and enjoyment of the game. For players and coaches, a fair and fair refereeing environment is the basic guarantee for them to play their strength and strive for victory. And for viewers, a fair, intense game is a key factor in their choice to watch the CBA.
In recent years, the issue of CBA referees has repeatedly become the focus of media and fans. In some games, there were obvious inconsistencies in the referee's penalty scale, and there were even some controversial decisions. This not only affects the fairness of the game, but also has a negative impact on the mentality of the players and the performance of the game. In addition, the referee's level of enforcement in the game was also questioned. At some key moments, the referee's enforcement mistakes even directly affected the outcome of the game.
In the face of such problems, the CBA league must take targeted adjustments and improvement measures. First of all, the CBA should strengthen the training and selection of referees. Only a high-level referee can guarantee the fairness and intensity of the game. Secondly, the CBA should establish a complete referee evaluation and assessment system to regularly evaluate the referee's law enforcement level to ensure that the referee's performance in the game is always at a high level. Finally, the CBA should strengthen the supervision and management of referees, and seriously deal with law enforcement mistakes and abuse of power to ensure that the fairness of the game is not affected.
For the CBA, the issue of refereeing is not only a job that needs to be improved, but also the key to the development of the league. Only by solving the problem of referees can we improve the overall level of CBA and attract more audience attention and participation. We hope that the CBA can face up to the problem, actively reform, present a fairer and more fierce game for the audience, and promote the continuous development of China's basketball industry.
(Disclaimer: The process and pictures described in the article are from the Internet, and this article aims to advocate positive social energy and no vulgar and other bad guidance.) If it involves copyright or character infringement issues, please contact us in time, and we will delete the content as soon as possible! ）