It is rumored on the Internet that the top ten Ming Jun and the top ten faint monarchs have caused controversy, and one person is not worthy of Ming Jun, and the controversy of the faint monarch is even greater
Recently, there is a picture circulating on the Internet, which is the top ten Ming monarchs and the top ten faint monarchs in ancient Chinese history, and the list has sparked a lot of controversy among history lovers, and today we will also intervene to discuss it.
Top 10 Gentlemen:
The first emperor of the ages - Qin Shi Huang
The Emperor of Cloth - Liu Bang
Expand the territory - Liu Che
Sheng Shimingjun - Li Shimin
The Merry Empress - Wu Zetian
Soldier Emperor - Zhao Kuangyin
Daming Taizu - Zhu Yuanzhang
A generation of Tianjiao - Genghis Khan
Create a prosperous era - Kangxi
风流倜傥 ——Qianlong
Ten Great Fools:
The tyrannical king - the king of Shang
The king of the fallen country - Hu Hai
Puppet Emperor - Emperor Xian of Han
The Idiot Emperor - Sima Zhen
The titular emperor - Tang Gaozong
The Emperor of Misery - Ming Sizong
Emperor - Shi Jingjiao
Killing his brother and father - Emperor Yang of Sui
Prisoner of a foreign country - Song Zhengzong
The head of the lewd monarch - Ming Wuzong
The Chinese people have always liked to discuss history, after all, we have a long history, and some are materials. Those feudal emperors have a higher appearance rate, of course, they have been discussed more, the statement of the faint monarch and the Ming monarch has always been, and the discussion is extremely sufficient, some of the faint monarchs and the Ming monarch have reached a consensus, and some are full of controversy, and the same is true of the top ten faint monarchs and Ming monarchs this time.
For the Ming Jun, the people on the list are all well-known emperors in history, Qin Emperor, Han Wu, Tang Sect, Song Zu are all listed, Han Gaozu Yuan Taizu, Ming Taizu Qing Shengzu are also on the list, and the other two places are reserved for Wu Zetian, the only female emperor in the ages, and Qianlong, who has the longest life and actually ruled the country.
These ten people can be summarized as Mingjun, and I personally think that there is not much controversy. Many friends have a lot of opinions about Emperor Qianlong, thinking that he is not worthy of the top ten Ming monarchs, and even thinks that he is a faint monarch, so let's briefly discuss him.
Qianlong is not worthy of the top ten Ming monarchs, personally agree, he is definitely not as good as Emperor Wen of Han, Emperor Guangwu of Han, Emperor Wen of Sui, Song Renzong and others, this is needless to say, but to say that he is not a Ming Jun, I am personally resolutely opposed.
If the ancient emperors had three distinctions: Mingjun, ordinary, and faint monarch, then Qianlong can definitely be summed up in Mingjun.
If nothing else, let's just say that he has made outstanding contributions to pacifying Dzungaria and Hezhuo, safeguarding the reunification of the motherland, and increasing the huge land area.
The emperor who opened up his territory in such a way must not be named a faint king.
Therefore, Qianlong should be taken from the top ten Ming monarchs and add Emperor Wen of Sui, but it definitely does not mean that Qianlong is not a Ming monarch.
Inside the faint king, the controversy is even greater.
There are many people in it who are not faint monarchs, such as Tang Gaozong Li Zhi, if he is a faint monarch, then there are few Ming monarchs in history. And Emperor Han Xian was at a bad time in his life, he was powerless and unable to control the situation.
The so-called faint king, at least he has to be a king, right? All his stupid behaviors must be done by himself. Emperor Han Xian is a mascot, he can't be regarded as a king, saying that he is a faint king, this belongs to the pot.
Also, although Ming Sizong Chongzhen is the king of the dead country, everyone knows that he is the one who is behind the blame, and the death of the Ming Dynasty has nothing to do with him. In the position of emperor, he actually did a lot of work, just looking at the last words he left when he died, this is not a faint king.
Many people say that Emperor Yang Guang of the Sui Dynasty is not a faint monarch, and I firmly disagree, if Yang Guang is not a faint monarch, then there will be no faint monarch in history.
The emperors have one of the most important historical missions, and it is also their duty, that is, to continue their own dynasty, but what about this Yang Guang? You must know that Emperor Wen of Sui, as a generation of Ming monarchs, governed the Sui Dynasty very well, and what he left to Yang Guang was a peaceful, stable, and beautiful reign of the emperor, which was a perfect start.
But such a good reign of the emperor and the Great Sui Dynasty with a bright future was tossed by him Yang Guang.
This is one of the most serious faults, not one.
Although Hu Hai, the second emperor of Qin, also led to the demise of the Qin State, in conscience, the foundation of the Qin Dynasty was extremely unstable, and the undercurrent was surging. But the situation accepted by Emperor Yang of Sui is a 100% start. As long as he works normally, he is definitely a generation of Ming Jun of Wenzhi and martial arts, how can there be anything to do with the later Tang Taizong.
Therefore, he Emperor Yang of Sui must be a faint monarch, and he is the first of the ten faint monarchs.
#Wonderful Writing Challenge#