laitimes

Netizens sued Xinhua Dictionary for improper interpretation: playing with female x?whip si?official response

author:Viagra says things 778

Recently, the news that a netizen sued "Xinhua Dictionary" has attracted public attention.

Netizens sued Xinhua Dictionary for improper interpretation: playing with female x?whip si?official response

According to the netizen, there are words and example sentences in the Xinhua Dictionary that are difficult to accept, teach bad children, and violate relevant laws and regulations, what is going on?

Netizens sued Xinhua Dictionary for improper interpretation: playing with female x?whip si?official response

The netizen pointed out that on page 500 of the "Xinhua Dictionary", the word "play" has a sentence to teach bad children with the filthy word "playing with female x".

Netizens sued Xinhua Dictionary for improper interpretation: playing with female x?whip si?official response

In addition, the word "don't" is interpreted as "don't have a hand qiang in the waist", which is forbidden in China, and this group of words has the meaning of guiding Tibetan qiang, which is very inappropriate.

Netizens sued Xinhua Dictionary for improper interpretation: playing with female x?whip si?official response

And the sentence formation of the word "tired" is "the child is small, it has become a burden", how can the child become a burden?

Netizens sued Xinhua Dictionary for improper interpretation: playing with female x?whip si?official response

In addition, the 12th edition of the Xinhua Dictionary did not include the word "倭寇", which was alleged to have violated the Patriotic Education Law of the People's Republic of China and was considered to lack patriotic spirit.

Netizens sued Xinhua Dictionary for improper interpretation: playing with female x?whip si?official response

At present, netizens have applied for prosecution on these four points because these contents are suspected of violating the "Regulations on the Administration of Publications".

In fact, as early as 2022, some parents reported that there were problems with "Xinhua Dictionary". For example, the word "be" is used as an inappropriate word for "employed", "membership", and "satisfied", as well as incomprehensible words such as "whip" in the dictionary for "whip". These questions make one wonder why such a group of words is present, and why are there no words for "whip" and "whipping"?

Netizens sued Xinhua Dictionary for improper interpretation: playing with female x?whip si?official response
Netizens sued Xinhua Dictionary for improper interpretation: playing with female x?whip si?official response

In response to the problem that the word "倭" does not have a "倭寇" group, Xinhua Dictionary Publishing House has responded, on the WeChat public account of "China Publishing and Marketing Weekly", an article published on June 27 responded: The 12th edition of the "Xinhua Dictionary" has added the word "倭寇", and there is no new version to delete the word "倭寇" before!

Netizens sued Xinhua Dictionary for improper interpretation: playing with female x?whip si?official response

Except for the word "倭", there has been no response to the other questions, and no correction has been made.

Most of them expressed their support for the incident of netizens suing Xinhua Dictionary, and even said that it was long overdue!

Netizens sued Xinhua Dictionary for improper interpretation: playing with female x?whip si?official response
Netizens sued Xinhua Dictionary for improper interpretation: playing with female x?whip si?official response

Xinhua Dictionary is one Xi of the essential tools for learning Chinese for every generation, but such word groups and sentence formations are really incomprehensible.

Netizens sued Xinhua Dictionary for improper interpretation: playing with female x?whip si?official response

The previous feedback was inconclusive, and this netizen's lawsuit hopes to attract the attention of relevant departments, check these educational reading materials, and give the public a reasonable explanation, don't let these readings teach bad children!

What do you think about this? Welcome to leave a message in the comment area!