laitimes

What is the reason why the Xinhua Dictionary hides the mystery of violating the rules, but it is silent when it is prosecuted?

On December 15, in a day when the country was cooling down rapidly, a piece of news suing Xinhua Dictionary for violating the rules was very popular.

Two netizens from Hangzhou said through video that they had submitted an indictment to the People's Court of Yuhang District, Hangzhou.

The content is to sue the 12th edition of the "Xinhua Dictionary" for multiple violations!

What is the reason why the Xinhua Dictionary hides the mystery of violating the rules, but it is silent when it is prosecuted?

"Xinhua Dictionary" is the common memory of almost everyone when they were students, especially in primary school.

How could the Xinhua Dictionary, which has been regarded by parents and children as the most officially recognized for decades, also go wrong?

With the revelations of the two prosecutors one by one, the big guy suddenly realized......

Sure enough, there's a lot of stuff in the dictionary......

That's a terrifying word......

Is it so difficult to form words when playing with words? "Playthings are demoralized" and "playing with power"...... Can't these words be used as an example?

Do you have to make up "playing with women"?

What is the reason why the Xinhua Dictionary hides the mystery of violating the rules, but it is silent when it is prosecuted?

It's okay to be redundant, but is it hard to form a sentence?

Work hard, grow, and don't be a burden to your family!

Isn't this kind of encouraging sentence formation fragrant, and why do we have to treat "children as a burden"?

This is a great violation of the traditional Chinese virtues of respecting the old and loving the young......

What is the reason why the Xinhua Dictionary hides the mystery of violating the rules, but it is silent when it is prosecuted?

You know, the word "Wako" is almost standard. Why, as an official dictionary, doesn't mention such phrases?

Not to mention explaining the meaning of "Wako......

What is the reason why the Xinhua Dictionary hides the mystery of violating the rules, but it is silent when it is prosecuted?

In addition, the "Xinhua Dictionary" also mentions the formation of the word "don't": a pistol pinned to the waist.

The prosecutor believes that the Xinhua dictionary is almost exclusively used by Chinese elementary school students!

Such a sentence formation is a blatant violation of the regulations on the administration of publications: publications aimed at minors must not contain content that induces minors to imitate acts that violate social morality and violate the law and commit crimes

I really don't know if I don't see it, and I'm shocked when I see it......

Many netizens also deliberately found the children's "Xinhua Dictionary" to check, and they were really speechless at this look!

All of these violations mentioned by the two prosecutors are present.

What is the reason why the Xinhua Dictionary hides the mystery of violating the rules, but it is silent when it is prosecuted?

In the face of this incident, there has been an uproar on the Internet.

According to an article, the publisher has issued a response to this incident, but "the voice is very small" and has been drowned out by overwhelming doubts?

However, I really haven't seen the source of any official reply, which is a bit chilling.

According to relevant information, "Xinhua Dictionary" is the first modern Chinese dictionary in New China, compiled by Xinhua Dictionary Publishing House (also known as the Dictionary Editorial Office of the People's Education Publishing House).
What is the reason why the Xinhua Dictionary hides the mystery of violating the rules, but it is silent when it is prosecuted?

At the same time, some netizens pointed out that in 2022, there will be some doubts about the content of "Xinhua Dictionary".

However, at that time, it didn't get to the point of a court lawsuit, so the matter seemed to be over......

If this is the case, then the publisher of Xinhua Dictionary really needs to be held responsible......

Since some people have pointed out the problem of content, why don't they pay attention to it?

It's like a large state-owned enterprise, some people make a small fuss and report some loopholes in the process, but the high-ranking leaders don't have time to take care of it, thinking that it is harmless......

Anyway, "the company is big and exclusive", so you don't have to worry about buying and selling!

Well, a year later, a more serious netizen appeared, and a complaint was directly sued in court, and the publisher couldn't deal with it head-on.

When will you be able to formally reply to the questions of netizens......?