Today, let's talk about the recent TV series "Thrush", which is so popular. You ask me if I've seen it? Oh, it has to be! But after reading it, I have something to say, and a lot of it!
First of all, the cast of this drama is simply a masterpiece of the alternation of the old and the new. On one side, the old drama bones are steadily supporting the scene, and on the other hand, the little fresh meat and Xiaohuadan are full of vitality. It sounds like a beautiful combination, but in reality, it's like listening to a classic old song and an auto-tuned TikTok tune together, and it feels ...... Well...... Weird.
Let's talk about the plot. The spy war script should be tense and exciting, right? But the plot in "Thrush" gives you a big reversal from time to time, which makes people dizzy. Sometimes I start to wonder if the director is playing "Guess what I'm going to do next", which is really love-hate-hate.
Let's move on to makeup and costumes. Oh buy ga! This is really the highlight of the highlights! The actors are dressed brighter than flowers, and the appearance rate of "Yishui Xin" is higher than that of the protagonist. Every time I see their intricate outfits, wandering through the hail of bullets, I wonder: this concealment has been too much of a failure!
I said directly at the beginning, there is a problem with the drama "Thrush"! Don't get me wrong, don't get me wrong, it's not that I've lost confidence in the spy war drama industry. It's just that this kind of "crossing" style spy war drama is really unpredictable: we want to see excitement, we want to watch wits, and we want to see historical texture...... The result is a fashion runway show?
But then again, while mentioning the problem in the article, I didn't forget to add some humor. For example, there is a comment on the actor's clothes: "A spy at the forefront of the fashion industry", doesn't it sound funny? But after these humorous ridicules, I hope we can understand more deeply - making dramas can't just be novel and good-looking!
And to all the audience friends (note that "we" can get closer), you must have also discovered these problems, right? After all, everyone is looking forward to more high-quality and intriguing works.
Finally, I would like to express my small hope at the end: directors, screenwriters, actors, please think more about it! We need a masterpiece in the true sense of the word, not a flashy "vase". I hope that "Thrush" can become an opportunity to arouse everyone's thinking and attention to the development direction of the high-quality spy war drama industry.
All in all, while "Thrush" provides us with a lot of talking points and jokes (and certainly praise), it is more like a mirror of the many problems and challenges that exist in the current TV industry. After all, who doesn't like to lie on the sofa, turn on the TV, and be brought into a wonderful, interlocking, and intriguing world of stories?