laitimes

Discussion: Who is "going against the grain" to frighten enterprises? Who is the beast?

author:Tieyun said

In Hu Xijin's eyes, the company is very much like a flock of frightened birds, on the one hand, it has just driven away the wild beasts, on the other hand, it is a lot of food scattered in the open space, whether it is happy to gather as a nest and reproduce, or whether it is worried that someone will release the cold gun again, and it is hesitating at the moment.

Discussion: Who is "going against the grain" to frighten enterprises? Who is the beast?

However, Hu Xijin is only a commentator and not a person who has actually participated in business management or work, so he can only imagine this.

Hu Xijin did not study economics, so he could only follow the policy.

The result, of course, is not to beat the drum.

So, does economic development require these companies to "fly down" and settle down?—— but what about food? What about expectations?

Discussion: Who is "going against the grain" to frighten enterprises? Who is the beast?

You must know that "if there is 20 percent profit, capital will be ready to move; if there is 50 percent profit, capital will take risks; if there is 100 percent profit, capital will dare to risk hanging its head; and if there is 300 percent profit, capital will dare to trample on all the laws of the world." ”

The profit-seeking nature of capital shows that the lure of these "big packs of food" is not enough.

So, what exactly is needed to "promote further economic recovery and high-quality development"?

1. What do enterprises and the market need?

1. Long-term stable and transparent policy (clean and efficient market "night watchman")

2. A market with sufficient purchasing power

3. Sound and clearly enforced laws

4. Abundant and efficient human resources and other resources

5. Various rules in line with international standards

2. What do workers need?

1. The "wage collective bargaining system" that can play games with enterprises

2. Trade unions that can fully protect workers, and the Labor Law that is well enforced

3. Welfare benefits that can guarantee the basic livelihood of workers (the lives of the workers themselves, their families, and their children)

4. The old are supported, the young are taught, and the sick are treated

5. Common prosperity based on spiritual and material civilization

If the above points are achieved, then these profit-seeking birds will naturally fall from the sky, and there is no need for Hu Xijin to shout at such a loud voice, don't shoot, don't be scared.

So, what are these gunshots or beasts? Is it Sima Nan's question? Is it a call for common prosperity? I don't think so.

1. Behind the overprotection, soft policies replace rigid laws

However, what we see is that behind the "overprotection" of private enterprises in some places, it means that relevant laws can be violated, and the subtext is that laws or rules are ignored in the eyes of these local leaders.

Replace long-standing laws with temporary "policies", and then God knows when you are unhappy, and the nets will be cast again.

Discussion: Who is "going against the grain" to frighten enterprises? Who is the beast?

In the words of a netizen's comment, it is "sprinkling food in the open space and waiting for all kinds of birds to eat, for example, it sounds a bit like someone has laid a trap waiting to drill into it." ”

The law is rigid, and the policy varies depending on the person who makes it, no matter how abundant the food in front of you is, it will not solve the stable expectation, and of course the birds will not come down.

2. Flexible legal system

Aside from policy factors, the implementation of the law is not strict, such as selective law enforcement that cannot be treated equally, and different law enforcement efforts in the same market, etc., resulting in different institutional environments for the same competition platform, just like referees adopting different adjudication standards for different athletes, which naturally loses fairness in market competition;

For example, different environmental law enforcement, labor law enforcement, traffic law enforcement, tax law enforcement, and endless taxes and fees in various places.

Discussion: Who is "going against the grain" to frighten enterprises? Who is the beast?

3. Protection and treatment of workers

Why do enterprises pay attention to these? Because people are the foundation of the survival and development of enterprises, and only by allowing every worker to live with dignity, hope, and confidence can the long-term development of enterprises be guaranteed.

For the vast market of 1.4 billion people, so many people live and work in peace and contentment, work happily and have children, do not worry about illness, pension, education, housing, and naturally focus on work and career, the market demand is large, the work is full of enthusiasm, and of course, the enterprise also has infinite stamina and motivation.

Migrant workers who have lost these guarantees are worried, and the results of working under pressure are of course different from those working in a career full of ideals and hopes.

Discussion: Who is "going against the grain" to frighten enterprises? Who is the beast?

"Peace" can be followed by "happiness". Only then can enterprises be truly competitive.

This is also the fundamental reason for the high wages and high treatment of workers in Musk's Chinese factories.

- There are people, there is everything.

Discussion: Who is "going against the grain" to frighten enterprises? Who is the beast?

Therefore, looking at the black magpies that circled the tree three turns, and He Zhi Keyi, Hu Xijin didn't know why they didn't fall, only chattered on one side, and then many fans cheered vigorously, Lao Hu was right. It's ridiculous.

As for the frightened "guns" and "beasts" - if they are all within the framework of the law, even if there are more guns and beasts, what can the birds do under the protection of a clear and strict legal web?

Those who were frightened away were, of course, those who broke the law.

And these birds that steal food should naturally be caught.

So why don't the birds fall, and who are these "guns" and "beasts"?

Discussion: Who is "going against the grain" to frighten enterprises? Who is the beast?