The plot is designed with insight into human nature. Others think that I have done a bad thing, as long as I don't do it in the future, can I still be a good person? And the real story is that when you do a wrong thing, in order to make up for this mistake, you may need to do a second wrong thing, and in order to make up for the second wrong thing, you need to do a third wrong thing... Everything seems to be just a little bit off the right path, until one day you find that you have gone so far that you can never come back... This is the reason why the ancients said not to take evil as small...
Specific to the plot, is it wrong for Alsace to slaughter the city? If you don't slaughter the city, you will only face more undead and infect more soldiers and civilians, is this wrong, do you have a better choice in this position? This may seem like a small step away from justice, but how much pain would it have for the heart of the prince who wanted to protect the people by slaughtering the people with his own hands? It was the Sstanolme massacre that planted the prince's endless anger, and in order to avenge the people who fell under his sword, he decided to go on an expedition to Northrend, which was both revenge for the demon king and the redemption of the prince's own soul, Is this wrong, do you have a better choice in this position?? ?
However, when the prince came to Northrend, he found that he was powerless to take revenge, and the soldiers were clamoring to go home, if to no avail, how did the prince deal with the innocent people who died in Stratholme, how did he face the loyal soldiers who followed him in Northrend, how did he explain Stratholme's massacre to the people, how did he face his father, who had infinite trust in him?
However, burning the ship means that there is no way back, in order to save the surviving expeditionary force, in order to avenge the people of Stratholme, in order to protect his own people, Arthas must take up the Frost Sorrow, is this wrong, do you have a better choice in this position? Since so many soldiers have already died on the battlefield for the sake of war, what is the point of dying one more, if a close friend can be killed, why can't the master be killed? If the master can be killed, why can't the father be killed?
When the prince reaches the end of his revenge, he finds that he can never go back. The so-called loss of soul by the sorrow of frost is an obscure expression of sympathy for the prince, in fact, the prince never lost his mind, he just had no face to face his subjects and his father, but in retrospect, where did the prince cross the line between good and evil? The only thing we can say is that there is only the first step, Stratholme!!
By the way, for some reasons, in reality, I have witnessed the trial of many corrupt officials, frankly speaking, I think most of their confessions are not so false, (acting bitter drama to deceive the judge?OMG, what circumstances should be sentenced to how many years, the internal regulations of the court system are very dead, do you think the judge really has so much authority to judge the case according to his mood???),
No nonsense, I mean, some people are really greedy, greedy even to the point of unreasonableness, but such people are not born like this, many of them are positive characters at the beginning, with outstanding ability and outstanding achievements, (really, people who have been involved in the agency know that it is okay to just brag and pat on the back, jump up and down, eat and drink together, but it is impossible to climb up one step in three years),
However, he helped a certain boss earn 10 million yuan in a business, and the boss invited him to a meal? In exchange for you, do you think you should go? Send a few shopping cards to you, do you think the boss should send them? Send some local specialties for the New Year, in exchange for you, do you think there is a big deal? Shouting that being an official means being selfless and selfless, how can you take a detour, don't say that you can't be an official, you can't get out of the society. However, then, there are thousands of gold and silver jewelry, then tens of thousands of bank cards, then hundreds of thousands of cash, then millions of calligraphy and paintings, tens of millions of company equity...
Really, many people are reluctant to spend the money themselves, reluctant to eat and wear, just put it in the bank or put cash at home, or buy a house, and live in it - there are too many houses. When I entered the prison, I found that I still shared a cell of more than 10 square meters, and the new bed was facing the toilet! In the big winter, the quilt for more than 10 yuan a bed was robbed and covered by the cell boss, and I couldn't sleep at night, and tens of millions of savings were useful? At this time, many people repented, wept bitterly, and knelt on the ground and begged for mercy.
If they could go back, there must be someone who took the first small gift, the first time he was greedy, as Stratholme in the tragedy of life, if they knew the story.
It is said that this answer should end here, and it may be enough to add it again, but as a logician, I can't bear to break logic, so it is necessary to show my attitude towards the Stratholme massacre in full, even if it is further explained that it may lead to schizophrenia, ah schizophrenia, because there are many wonderful replies in the comments, and the replies one by one stimulate more thinking, so I really hope to inspire more gods to express their opinions.
Don't take the evil as a small thing, this is my basic attitude towards this event, and it is also the basic principle that I think I should adhere to in life, but ask myself, if I were in the position of Alsace, would Stratholme be slaughtered or not? Of course, he would slaughter the city! Not slaughtering the city means waiting until the inhabitants are transformed into undead to kill and injure more citizens and soldiers, and between the lives of soldiers and their own moral conscience, I think it is more courageous and noble to choose the latter. In contrast, Uther's antiquity and Gianna's self-preservation are even more insignificant.
But !!''but'' is coming~~
But !!''but'' is coming~~
But !!''but'' is coming~~
Important things to say three times~~~
However, since it is right to slaughter the city, then what is wrong with Arthas?! Since you will also slaughter you in your place, that is, you will also fall in your place??? my answer is: I will slaughter the city, but I will not choose to fall
When a large number of netizens read this, they took out kitchen knives and said, if I don't kill you today, do you still think that Zhihu netizens are all two hundred and five
Don't worry, listen to me, here we have to distinguish between "necessity" and "legitimacy". These two concepts. It may be said that it is necessary to understand that "necessity" is not the same as "legitimacy", that is, some things are forced to do because of the situation, but you must understand that doing this is purely a last resort, and the fact that you have to do evil in order to avoid big evil does not mean that you have to whitewash evil into good, so that you can do evil every day.
It's a mouth-twister? Confucius said that 'men and women do not kiss each other', but in the same chapter he also talks about 'sister-in-law drowning, uncle helping her'. According to the etiquette system, men and women cannot have skin-to-skin contact casually, but if the sister-in-law falls into the water, the brother-in-law can't watch the sister-in-law drown because of the inadmissibility of men and women, so he should reach out and pull the sister-in-law up (skin contact). The principle should be adhered to, but under special circumstances, adapting the principle does not violate the principle, and the so-called 'economic authority' is also. It is the principle that men and women do not touch, but when it comes to the emergency situation where the sister-in-law falls into the water and may drown, and reaches out to help, it is called the principle of flexibility, not the principle of destruction, but after the sister-in-law pulls it up, she can't hold hands again, and she should abide by the principle again.
Look at the Prince of Arthas, you can't kill innocent people, that's called principle, slaughtering mortal residents to avoid greater casualties can be called a contingency, but when the emergency passes, you still have to abide by the principle that you can't slaughter innocents, and the prince didn't correctly understand the meaning of the principle after Stratholme tried to break through the principle, but abandoned the principle, burned the ship, led to the mercenaries being killed, killed the king of the hill, killed Uther, killed his own father, these were forced to do so? Are these doing small evils to avoid big evils? Just like the little uncle in the chestnut, because the sister-in-law fell into the water, and to hold hands, of course, is not wrong, but when the sister-in-law is rescued, you have to go to the hands every day, even from the hands to the chest, and finally to other places (covering the face), do you think it can be considered right?
Finally, let's have a piece of chicken soup, what we learn in school is righteousness, kindness, honesty, hard work, and fairness, but when we get to society, we often find that it is not the case, cheated and abducted to make a lot of money, kind and honest poor eggs, despicable and shameless can be promoted, dedication and dedication are really pitiful, girls love Bo Qinglang, who sees the infatuation of dicks?
Pit, most young people enter the society, the first thing they feel is this kind of huge impact on the so-called 'three views', you don't conform to this kind of 'social rules', you will be rejected by the society, one of my juniors told me, we have learned in school for so many years to respect human rights, I went to handle the case for the first time, the suspect is not honest, our captain didn't say a word, it was a slap in the face, at that moment, I felt that what I had learned for more than ten years was knocked over by that slap.
Many people have a moment when they first enter the society, and they feel that the beliefs that teachers and parents have instilled in them for more than 20 years have been trampled on the ground so easily, maybe it is when you see that sycophants who don't do anything are promoted faster than anyone else. Maybe it's when you see an older colleague get a kickback with peace of mind, maybe it's when you give your first client a drink to find a lady, maybe it's when you see an innocent and kind girl who is moved by three or two sweet words and throws her arms to the unkind party master. How does it feel?
Do you feel the mood of Alsace in Stratholme???
Do you also think that Master and our parents have been lying to us all along???
Do you think so many principles are bullshit???
You're going to trample those bullshit principles under your feet too, thinking that all I need is power/power/money???
If someone promises you the money, power, and status you want, will you follow him???
So, why is the fall of Alsace in line with human nature, because each of us has experienced this kind of scene, we have all faced temptations, and there are several people who have taken the step of Stratholme and in the end have not lost themselves in the lust for power and status???
Pure light and goodness only exist in God's heaven, the world is always intertwined with good and evil, black and white are difficult to distinguish, to be a good person, to be a good person who wants to do something in his life, after all, he has to do a lot of things that he is not willing to do, Confucius still has Chen Cai's misfortune, Nanzi's ridicule, good people are also difficult to be white and flawless, the key is whether you have lost your original intention in the compromise again and again, and finally take the compulsion as peace of mind.
Conclude with another book of faith, the Bible: My child, you will walk with many people on the road of life, and you may even make alliances with the devil if necessary. Just keep one thing in mind: you must always make sure that you are leading the devil and not letting the devil lead you. Quite appropriate, I think.
Edited on 2016-09-22 11:56