"Rich and rich without me, air pollution depends on me?"
As soon as the notice of the two counties in Sichuan prohibiting the illegal smoking of bacon came out, it attracted the anger of countless Sichuan people!
Smoked bacon products have a history of thousands of years, but air pollution only appeared in modern industry, how did the traditional smoked bacon become the culprit of air pollution?
Without actual research and without considering the people's feelings, this kind of "one-size-fits-all" approach not only attracted many netizens to complain, but even the central radio network also commented: prohibiting private smoking of bacon on the grounds of polluting the atmosphere, how to talk about "respecting tradition and facilitating citizens"?
Now the latest development of the incident is that the two counties in Sichuan have apologized and explained the centralized smoking bacon again, but netizens still don't buy it, because these questions are still not solved!
Smoked bacon is an authentic traditional delicacy in China's Sichuan-Chongqing region, with a history of thousands of years, and is still regarded as an indispensable delicacy by locals today, but smoking is also an indispensable process in the production process.
As early as 2015, Sichuan, Chongqing, Guizhou and other places caused heated discussions due to the regulations on setting up bacon smoking points, one is to protect the environment, and the other is for the health and safety of the people.
Because there have been fires caused by smoked bacon before.
Therefore, at the end of the year and the beginning of the year in some places, the local relevant departments will repeatedly remind residents of the precautions for smoking bacon, and repeatedly emphasize that the fire escape must be unobstructed.
So in this way, the centralized smoking of bacon is not a temporary proposal.
In fact, whether it is to protect the environment or for the sake of the lives and health of the people, there is nothing wrong with this, but the inappropriate thing is that although the two counties of Sichuan have issued notices, they have not been able to explain the issues that the masses are concerned about, and this "one-size-fits-all" approach is really unconvincing.
According to Jimu News on November 22, Tongjiang and Nanjiang counties in Sichuan issued a notice saying: In order to deal with air pollution, private smoking of bacon is prohibited and multiple smoking points are designated, as follows:
1. It is forbidden to build wax product smoking facilities in the county town farmers' market and other places, and it is forbidden to build wax product smoking facilities without authorization in the county area, and the wax products in the county town shall be smoked at designated points.
2. Centralized smoking point 1: Chengdong Village No. 1 Society, Bizhou Street, centralized smoking point 2: Bashan Animal Husbandry, but this smoking point has a rule: smoking is limited to meat products purchased in the company.
3. Any violation of the notice will be dealt with in accordance with relevant laws and regulations, and those who obstruct the performance of official duties will also be dealt with in accordance with relevant regulations.
With the four official seals under this notice, this matter seems to have been decided.
While there is nothing wrong with protecting the environment, is it really that simple to implement? Did you do any research before issuing the ban, and did you take into account the actual situation and traditional customs of the local population?
In response to this ban, netizens also raised several major questions:
1. What is the difference in the total amount of pollution emitted between self-smoked and centralized smoke?
2. How were these two designated centralized smoking sites designated, and what are the criteria?
3. Do these two centralized smoking points have environmental protection equipment, whether the equipment is qualified, and whether the smoking process complies with environmental protection regulations?
4. If the smoking point does reduce pollution, there is still a concern that the meat I send in is still the same piece as the one I pick up?
5. The two centralized smoking enterprises both claimed that centralized smoking needs to charge between 1 and 4 yuan per catty, and one of the smoking points also stipulates that if you want to smoke meat from them, you have to buy their meat, and the processing fee is 3.5 yuan per catty, and the packaging fee is calculated separately.
"Everyone has a responsibility to protect the environment", but the above issues must be explained clearly to the people, otherwise it will be difficult to convince.
And when the announcement came out, contemporary netizens also commented one after another, and almost died of laughter in the comment area:
Some people say that the source of the sudden rise in global temperature and the intensification of the greenhouse effect is actually caused by the people of Bazhong in Sichuan Province smoking bacon, and I hope that the people of Sichuan will give an explanation to the people of the world;
Some people say: No wonder I have been coughing recently, it turned out to be Sichuan smoked bacon, smoked so that I have been coughing, it is recommended to send me some to replenish my body;
This netizen said that he was reborn, reborn a week before the ban on bacon, in the last life he watched his boyfriend and girlfriends eat bacon, causing himself to be starved to death, and in this life he must stock up on bacon and take revenge.
I have to say that contemporary netizens are really masters of per capita connotation, and people can't find flaws at all, and they can't laugh.
However, this also reflects everyone's opinions, and when the incident fermented, major media also commented.
The surging news believes that it is unconvincing to ban smoking meat on the grounds of environmental protection and punish violators;
Southern Metropolis Daily believes that public policy must pay attention to rationality and legitimacy, which is the basis of the rule of law government;
Modern Express believes that the controversy caused by the announcement of the ban on privately smoked bacon in two counties in Sichuan may be related to the lack of comprehensive public services provided by the local government.
Seeing that there are more and more public opinions, the governments of the two counties in Sichuan have also answered the questions of netizens, as follows:
1. I apologize for the mistakes in the previous briefing.
2. In order to improve the ambient air quality in the urban area, eliminate potential safety hazards, reduce pollution, protect the health of the people, and meet the actual needs of life, a centralized smoking point for wax products is set up.
3. The smoking point is located outside the smoking control area, and is equipped with spraying, filtration and other related environmental protection equipment, and only the cost will be charged in the process.
4. Chengdong Village, Bizhou Street, is a centralized smoking point, which has been completed and can be put into use on November 25, with 5 convenient collection points set up at the smoking point.
5. Bashan Animal Husbandry is the second smoking point, which is a wax product smoking point built by the company, and the statement that "smoking is limited to meat products purchased at the company" in the original notice is problematic, reflecting their lax control and work mistakes.
6. In order to allow the people to complete the smoking more quickly and efficiently, they will also configure some mobile smoking equipment around the urban area in a timely manner according to the actual situation.
In this way, the local government acted very quickly, and was able to recognize and correct the shortcomings in the circular in a timely manner, which is very commendable.
In addition, some reporters interviewed the relevant personnel of Bashan Animal Husbandry, and the other party also explained why they only smoke their own company's bacon, because the outside pork is in the epidemic quarantine, and they are afraid of foreign pigs and pollute their own organic pigs.
Now, after consulting the government again, they changed their plan and decided that they could smoke their pork whether they bought it or not.
If it is 1.6 yuan a pound for the residents to pickle it themselves, and the pigs are taken to let them pickle, then it is 4 yuan, there are several points in the city, after receiving it, it can be pickled in four or five days, and then notify the residents to come and pick it up.
In this way, it can protect the environment, and secondly, it also ensures the personal safety of residents, and it is both efficient and convenient, and only needs to charge a basic fee, which is simply a triple win.
However, this also reflects a strange phenomenon, that is, why did the local government not pay attention to these details before the fermentation of public opinion? If this matter did not ferment, then how should the common people smoke bacon?
So this seems to be just a policy of the two counties, but this policy is related to thousands of households, if the policy is implemented well, then Chongqing and other places may also follow suit, so as long as it is related to the people, it is not a trivial matter.
Instead, all aspects must be taken into account, and research must be done well, rather than saying that it is to protect the environment, and then forcibly stipulate that it must be smoked centrally, and the details are not explained well, which will inevitably lead to contradictions.
In fact, environmental protection has always been the top priority in many regions, because lucid waters and lush mountains are invaluable assets, and they are the only way for human beings to survive and develop in the future, so only if we do a good job in all aspects of protection, can we leave this precious wealth to future generations.
Therefore, this policy of the two counties in Sichuan is correct, and the transformation is inevitable, but it must be in line with the people's livelihood, and it is also necessary to respect the customs and people's living habits, as long as it is realistic, as long as it is not a rough transformation, as long as the public will be respected, I believe that the people of the two places will support it.
Only by formulating reasonable and feasible policies and making the masses truly feel the convenience and benefits is the key to social governance.
What do you think about this?Do you think the charge for centralized smoking is reasonable?Welcome to leave a message to discuss!