laitimes

The United States "entrained private goods" in the Security Council and wanted to avenge its revenge in August? The Chinese side still did not give face

At the recent UN Security Council meeting, the representative of the United States accused China of vetoing the draft resolution proposed by the United States, and our ambassador hit back on the spot, stressing that China is not "taking the blame" for the current situation in Gaza.

The United States "entrained private goods" in the Security Council and wanted to avenge its revenge in August? The Chinese side still did not give face

Zhang Jun, China's permanent representative to the United Nations, mentioned that the accusations made by the United States are completely unreasonable, and that since the beginning of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, the United States has vetoed dozens of UN Council draft resolutions on the Middle East and the Palestinian-Israeli issue, making it difficult for the Security Council to play its due constructive role on the issue of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict”。

Just as my ambassador said, this time, the United States was completely looking for trouble, and vetoed so many drafts in advance, and the United States, knowing that it was very likely that its draft would be vetoed, finally got cheeky and was rejected, and it also slapped China for why it vetoed its own draft.

The United States "entrained private goods" in the Security Council and wanted to avenge its revenge in August? The Chinese side still did not give face

Although the reason why the United States wants to stand up for Israel is one reason, this time it is not only China that voted against the draft proposed by the United States, but the United States is holding on to China, and it is inevitable that people will feel that the United States is "carrying private goods."

It is worth noting that China is the rotating presidency of the Security Council in November, so it is not excluded that the United States is giving China a disgrace in advance, probably questioning whether China can play this role in advance, after the outbreak of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, the people of the world began to wake up, and the United States found that what it said now is becoming more and more unlistened, and the United States is determined to suppress and contain China, so naturally it does not want China's influence and discourse power to further expand, and is afraid that it will be surpassed by China.

And when it comes to the rotating presidency of the Security Council, there was also an interesting thing that happened in August, because the rotating presidency of the Security Council in August was held by the United States, and as a result, as soon as the United States took office, it used its position as the rotating presidency of the Security Council to attack Russia, and at that time, Russia suspended the Black Sea grain agreement because the West has not kept its commitments, and as a result, Blinken tried to attack Russia in the Security Council.

The United States "entrained private goods" in the Security Council and wanted to avenge its revenge in August? The Chinese side still did not give face

thinks that Russia is using grain as a weapon to starve the whole world, the whole world is fed up with Russia, and everyone has to say no to Russia, but Zhang Jun, who was also China's permanent representative to the United Nations at that time, was the first to refute Blinken, believing that the world needs not only Ukrainian grain, but also Russian grain.

China's reminder also sobered up the representatives of many countries, and also embarrassed Blinken at that time.

Therefore, in accordance with the character of the United States, which is determined to repay the situation, China will naturally not let go of this opportunity if China assumes the rotating presidency of the Security Council this time.

The United States "entrained private goods" in the Security Council and wanted to avenge its revenge in August? The Chinese side still did not give face

However, the United States still did not bargain this time, and my ambassador finally mentioned that China's voting position is based on facts, law, conscience and justice. What is even more murderous is that although the Security Council resolution has not been adopted, the UN General Assembly resolution on the ceasefire in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict has been supported by the overwhelming majority of United Nations countries, and this time a total of 120 votes were in favor, and only the United States and 14 other countries opposed it, which also proves that China's voting position is completely correct.

The most important thing is that China did not adopt the method of coercive pressure like the United States, which is more the voice of most countries themselves, which makes it seem that the United States used the United Nations so painstakingly to "bully" Russia, but in the end did not achieve the results it wanted, which is in stark contrast.

At the beginning, China hoped that the United States would assume the responsibility of the rotating presidency of the Security Council, and this time China assumed the rotating presidency of the Security Council, which naturally taught the United States how to play this role well.