The content of this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete.
Heck, no one expected that the debate between the sketch actor Gong Hanlin and the football player Feng Xiaoting would become so fierce and attract so much attention. What's even more surprising is that among the players who have been questioned and criticized, the first one to choose to announce his retirement from the net was actor Li Jiahang, who only made a statement later.
Li Jiahang, who began his acting career in 2008, made his debut by participating in "Golden Armor Warrior", and later became famous for starring in "Love Apartment Season 2" and "New Huanzhu Gege". Although his fame is not as good as Chen He and others, he is also a little prestigious in the entertainment industry. The background of the incident was the public opinion war triggered by Gong Hanlin's complaint, netizens were dissatisfied with the national football team, and Gong Hanlin's remarks made the national football team the target of public criticism. Next, Feng Xiaoting and Dong Lu's responses, as well as Gong Hanlin's counterattack, further complicated the whole incident.
During this period, the famous cross talk actor Feng Gong also released a video, although he later denied that he was complaining about the men's football team, but the meaning in the words made people think. Recently, the rough response of Fan Zhiyi, a famous national football player, has pushed the situation to a new climax. Netizens have questioned and criticized the men's football team to an unprecedented level.
And Li Jiahang's withdrawal from the network is even more twists and turns. At the same time as the whole network bombarded the national football team, he published a small essay that he thought was more fair, saying that fans have the right to scold the national football team, but for some people who don't care about football, they should remain silent. The remarks sparked a huge controversy, with some agreeing with his neutral views, while others lashed out at him for being on the side of the national football team. Subsequently, Li Jiahang explained his speech and questioned that some netizens directly attacked him without reading the full text.
However, all this did not quell the controversy. The next day, Li Jiahang posted again, expressing his understanding of the fans' scolding of the national football team, but opposing venting his anger in the name of this. He tried to clarify his position, but then deleted the statement and announced the closure of his account, apologizing to all those who were hurt by his remarks. This decision once again aroused heated discussions among netizens, some people thought that he was hot, and some people felt that his psychological tolerance was too poor. Some netizens were upset with him, thinking that his analysis was very rational, but they were forced to withdraw from the Internet because of this.
Regarding Li Jiahang's withdrawal from the network, netizens have their own opinions. Some people think that he is taking advantage of the heat and deliberately causing controversy. Some people think it's a pity that he quits the network, thinking that his views are very reasonable, but he has been attacked because of his remarks. However, there are also those who understand his decision, arguing that as a public figure, he has the freedom to express his opinions, but also needs to take into account his influence.
This is not the first time that this kind of speech has led to an exit from the network. Previously, actor Zhou Haimei was criticized by the audience for playing the villain in the play, and finally chose to announce her withdrawal from the Internet. Zhou Haimei's situation is different from Li Jiahang's, she was attacked because of her acting skills, while Li Jiahang was because she dabbled in sensitive topics and caused controversy.
At this moment when people in the entertainment industry are silent, Li Jiahang's withdrawal from the network has undoubtedly become the target of public criticism. Some people think that he is a "bird" and therefore has endured excessive online violence. But others believe that he should perhaps be more cautious and avoid touching sensitive topics given his status and influence. It is undeniable that he, like Zhou Haimei, has become a victim of online violence.
The whole incident has once again drawn attention to online violence. In the face of online violence, artists seem to have no choice but to be tough, defend their rights in the law, or choose to remain silent. Li Jiahang and Zhou Haimei's choice to withdraw from the Internet may be their helpless response to this dilemma, and it is also a silent protest against online violence.
The "Feng Gong War" has sparked widespread discussion about football, free speech and online violence. The choices and opinions of people in the entertainment industry have become the focus of public opinion, and Li Jiahang's withdrawal from the network has also made people think about whether public figures should also bear some responsibility for their words while speaking freely. The controversy over this topic is far from subsided, and the whole incident has left a deep reflection on people.
Revelation:
Li Jiahang's withdrawal has provided us with some profound enlightenment. First of all, as a public figure, the influence of speech far exceeds that of ordinary people, and you need to be more careful with your words. Second, the power of public opinion is enormous, and the impulse of the moment may trigger a chain reaction that affects one's own image and career. Most importantly, online violence is a problem that cannot be ignored, and for individuals, choosing to avoid it may be a helpless move to protect themselves.
Mr. Li's remarks sparked a huge controversy, and his stance appeared relatively neutral, but he was also the subject of severe cyberattacks. This allows us to see the double-edged sword of online speech, on the one hand, the embodiment of freedom of speech, and on the other hand, the breeding of online violence. In the maelstrom of public opinion, public figures need to be more sensible about issues and avoid overly aggressive or impulsive rhetoric.
Reason:
First of all, freedom of expression is the cornerstone of social progress, but speech should also be responsible. The remarks of public figures can have a profound impact on society, so more caution and accountability need to be taken place. Second, online violence is a pervasive problem, and society needs to work together to reduce the occurrence of this phenomenon. Finally, public figures can choose a more calm and rational way to avoid excessive emotion when dealing with public opinion turmoil.
Summary:
In this case, we have seen the importance of speech to individuals and societies, as well as the dangers of online violence. Mr. Li's withdrawal may have been motivated by an avoidance of online violence, but it also sparked reflections on freedom of expression and responsibility. As viewers, we need to be more rational about what public figures say, and we should also work together to reduce the occurrence of online violence. This incident reminds us that while we are free to speak, we also need to be responsible for our own words, and at the same time be more rational about what others say. In the Internet age, the power of words is even greater, and we need to use this power more carefully to promote the healthy development of society.
Continuing the revelation:
The incident has also sparked deep reflection on freedom of speech and the scrutiny of public opinion. In the age of information explosion, everyone has the right to speak out, but with that comes responsibility. Public figures should take into account the possible consequences when expressing their personal opinions so as not to trigger an overly violent reaction. In this case, the individual's rhetoric also exposes society's tolerance for different points of view, and whether online public opinion can be discussed rationally and orderly.
This incident is also a reminder to the public. While freedom of speech, we need to cultivate the ability to think rationally and avoid being overly emotional about what is said on the Internet. We should treat the remarks of public figures in a rational and objective manner, and avoid falling too far into emotional attacks. It is also a way to build a good online atmosphere, to promote social progress through rational discussion, rather than to satisfy individual emotions through online violence.
Reason:
First, freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a pluralistic society, but individuals need to be aware of possible social responses when exercising this right. Second, society should encourage rational discussion and be more tolerant of dissenting voices, rather than addressing dissent through online violence. Finally, public figures need to be more cautious when expressing their opinions and be aware of the impact their words can have on society.
Summary:
This incident presents a new face of free speech in the age of social media. Individuals need to think more about the overall response of society while speaking out, and the public needs to develop the ability to look at different expressions rationally. Through rational discussion and an inclusive attitude, we can work together to build a more open and rational online environment. This is also the time of information overload, and we need to think more deeply about how to balance the importance of freedom of expression and social responsibility.
The above content information is from the Internet, relevant data, and theoretical research on the Internet information, which does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article does not assume any direct or indirect legal responsibility for any of the above or related issues.