Recently, Southwest University of Science and Technology rushed to the hot search list because of a "wonton-eating" incident. I thought it was another food safety problem, but the ending was reversed.
The cause of the incident was that a female student from Southwest University of Science and Technology bought a bowl of wontons at the school gate, and ate a "foreign body" in it, which eventually triggered a series of Rashomon effects.
At first, netizens who were led by girls have now woken up to the fact that girls are the "culprits" of rumors, and at the same time, netizens also found out that girls are activists who join the party.
What are the causes and consequences of this "wonton gate" incident, let's find out together.
1. The "farce" of eating wontons
I believe that all contemporary college students have the experience of spending at the food stalls at the school gate. In particular, there are "snack streets" tailored for students in the vicinity of some colleges and universities.
But a wonton stall at the gate of Southwest University of Science and Technology has become the focus of heated discussions.
What happened was that a female student from Southwest University of Science and Technology bought a bowl of wontons at the wonton stall at the school gate, but after returning to the dormitory, the girl posted a photo in the school's exchange group.
The communication group of nearly 2,000 people was also attracted by this photo. In the photo, I saw that there was a "foreign object" suspected to be a plastic wire in the wonton meat filling.
The girl used an exaggerated tone to name the "crime" of this wonton stall, and added words such as "help, oh my God", which seemed to be full of feelings.
In the concept of ordinary people, if you eat a foreign object in a small stall, as long as it is not too much, you will pick it out and ask the boss to change a bowl, and you can also find a consumer hotline to protect your rights.
But then the girl made her approach public, and at the same time posted a "small essay" full of accusations against the wonton stand.
In the girl's description, after eating a foreign object, she went to the stall with two male classmates and asked the boss for an explanation. And the owner of this wonton stall is an aunt in her fifties.
The girl said that in the process of theorizing, the aunt thought that she was quite unreasonable, so she scooped up the hot oil with the pot and spoon in her hand and poured it on herself, and splashed it several times in a row.
At the same time, the aunt's lover also clashed with the 2 classmates she brought, and she also beat her classmates.
Later, the girl said that the surrounding classmates couldn't stand it and called the police, and after the police came, the stall owner's aunt sued the wicked person first, telling the police that she was "wrong".
He also quibbled that the plastic silk was coriander, and claimed that he suffered from depression. The whole thing can be summed up as the girl asked the stall owner's aunt for an explanation, but she was verbally abused and beaten and threatened.
As soon as the incident was released, many netizens and students in the school condemned the wonton stalls, and even lost their business for a while. At the same time, the stall owner also received many letters from netizens, condemning her immoral behavior.
Originally, everyone thought that, as the girl said, it was the wonton stall owner's mistake, but things took a 180-degree turn.
Second, the emergence of reversal
When the accusation against the stall owner in the "small essay" released by the girl became more and more popular, careful netizens found many of the "loopholes".
The cause of the incident was the breaking of the wonton skin, and then a "foreign object" was found, but this kind of thing is also very common, and the girl's article said that after finding the shopkeeper's theory, she was verbally abused and beaten.
But just because of a ravioli, the owner of the stall for decades is going to beat people? This is not what an experienced food business operator would do.
Secondly, the girl also said that she talked to the shopkeeper and had always been a friendly attitude, which can also be seen from this loophole, the shopkeeper cannot be angry with a friendly person, let alone an old shopkeeper with many years of experience.
Sure enough, after the girl posted the article, the stall owner also commissioned a student from the school to publish a clarification article.
In the article, what the stall owner said was similar to what happened in the girl's post, but the content and the attitude of the two were reversed.
The stall owner said that at first, the girl came to ask him in an unfriendly tone why the wontons were not priced. Later, the stall owner said 12 yuan for 15 yuan, but the girl said it was too expensive.
Later, the girl ordered a bowl, and she chatted with the owner for a while. After waiting for the wontons to be served, the girl noticed that one of the wontons had broken skin.
The shopkeeper also kindly said that he would make up two for her when the time came, but the girl has not been relenting, and her tone is very domineering. In order not to affect the business, the shopkeeper also said that this order is free for girls.
But the girl still didn't give up, and kept complaining about the broken skin of the wontons. Later, the shopkeeper said, "My girl didn't talk to me like that." ”
Later, the girl threatened to make the shopkeeper look good, and threatened the shopkeeper that you would be unlucky at night.
Later, the shopkeeper said that the girl brought two boys to the stall to make trouble, and his wife thought he was being bullied, so he rushed up.
But at this time, one of the boys pushed his wife, and the shopkeeper shouted anxiously: "He has brain surgery, you can't touch him." ”
The boy retorted, "We still have neurotics." ”
Seeing that there were more and more gatherings, the shopkeeper pretended to scoop up the hot oil and splash it out, but it was just an action, who knew that it was taken out of context, and later the surrounding shopkeepers helped to call the police.
The owner of the wonton shop also said that there was surveillance around him at that time, and what he said was true.
After the matter fermented, the school also set up an investigation team, and the investigation found that in order to create a topic and heat, the girls pinched their heads and tails, and deliberately put plastic silk into the wontons to create an illusion to deceive the public.
And the purpose of doing this is to make yourself angry. The most infuriating thing is that the girl used exaggerated remarks on multiple social media to promote, resulting in the damage to the reputation of the owner.
At the same time, some netizens broke out that the girl was actually an active member of the school's party, and the subsequent girls and counselors were called to the public security, and the girls were asked to delete the video, otherwise the scholarship and activist quota for girls would be cancelled.
This news also shocked netizens, so rumors about a girl in a store are still active in the party. A girl's behavior is not worthy of being a party member at all.
Epilogue:
As an active member of the party, she not only failed to implement the ideology of party members, but also maliciously smeared the facts, so that the shopkeeper suffered unfair treatment.
At the same time, the girl's behavior has incited the emotions of netizens and made netizens who don't know the truth follow suit, so on the Internet, everyone should also keep their eyes open. Finally, what do you think about this matter?