Recently, the UN Security Council reconvened to discuss a solution to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. Representatives of the United States and Russia submitted separate proposals, but neither of them was adopted. Among them, the draft submitted by the United States is controversial because it ignores the most desired goal of the international community: a ceasefire. Even China and Russia did not hesitate to vote against it. In the current situation, a ceasefire is the most urgent task, and only through a ceasefire can more civilian casualties be avoided, the two sides can calm down, and create conditions for subsequent negotiations and humanitarian relief. Therefore, no matter which country submits a proposal, it must have a ceasefire as the primary objective, otherwise it will appear hollow and lack a central idea. Against the backdrop of the intensification and deterioration of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, we should think about how to truly resolve this crisis in order to break the current deadlock. Will the United States support a ceasefire between the two sides of the conflict after Russia's proposal is vetoed? This is the most critical issue at the moment.
It is not surprising that the representative of the United States once again vetoed the Russian draft. Relations between the United States and Russia have become so stiff that it is almost impossible to count on the United States to support Russia's program. Moreover, the Russian draft does not meet the expectations of the United States and Israel. What is ironic, however, is that the Israeli representative blames China and Russia, arguing that they should not veto the US proposal. Ambassador Zhang Jun, China's permanent representative to the United Nations, resolutely responded to Israel's attack. Ambassador Zhang Jun said that China supports Russia's plan and does not take sides, and China has always stood on the side of justice. China has not only criticized the harm inflicted on innocent civilians, but also condemned Hamas's actions. China is concerned about whether the two sides can cease fire as soon as possible and protect the legitimate rights and interests of the Palestinian people. Israel's attack on China is clearly the wrong target.
Ambassador Zhang Jun pointed out that the fundamental cause of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict lies in the fact that the two-state solution has not been fully implemented. So, will the two sides be able to cease fire as soon as possible? Can the rights and interests of the Palestinian people be protected? Please leave a comment to share your views. The question of the two-State solution remains to be resolved, and the Palestinian-Israeli conflict has long been the focus of attention of the international community. As a Jewish state in the Middle East, Israel grew rapidly after its founding. However, the people of the Palestinian territories have been dispersed and marginalized, and their demands have long been ignored. To resolve the fundamental problems of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, it is necessary to base ourselves on the root causes and seek a genuine solution. Recently, the representative of the United States submitted a proposal, which, disappointingly, did not reflect a true "two-state solution".
On the contrary, superficial or potential favoritism towards Israel is destined to fail to solve the problem, and even make the opposing side more disgusted and exacerbate the contradictions. If the United States really wants to solve this problem, then it must put aside its prejudice against Palestine, truly be just and neutral, and balance the balance between Palestine and Israel. Only in this way can the foundations of a lasting peace be established between the two sides. However, it is not easy to achieve this goal. Behind the Palestinian-Israeli conflict lies complex historical, religious, and ethnic issues, which will inevitably face tremendous difficulties in resolving them. But no matter how difficult it is, we must not give up our efforts. The international community should stand firmly on the position of impartiality and neutrality and actively promote the settlement of the Palestinian-Israeli issue. In general, the settlement of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict needs to be based on the root causes and reflect a true two-State solution.
As an important member of the international community, the United States should abandon prejudice, truly be fair and neutral, and strive to promote the peace process between Palestine and Israel. Only in this way can we bring true peace, stability and prosperity to the Palestinian and Israeli peoples. So, what do you think is the fundamental problem with the Israeli-Palestinian conflict? What are your views on the proposal submitted by the representative of the United States? Please leave your comments.