The content of this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete. This article is only published in today's headlines, please do not move.
Regarding the comparison of ranks between military cadres and local cadres, we can often see various articles on the Internet. However, there is an obvious misunderstanding in these articles, namely the one-to-one correspondence between military ranks and the ranks of local cadres. Some articles claim that major generals correspond to the level of local vice-ministers, others say that they correspond to the level of main department, and others propose other correspondences.
However, these comparisons are subjective and lack any substantive basis. What's more, ranks and ranks are not equivalent. Officers have both ranks and ranks, while local cadres have only ranks and no ranks. Therefore, in order to correctly compare the rank relationship between military cadres and local cadres, it is necessary to use the rank of officer to correspond to the rank of local cadre. Only such level correspondence is accurate.
It is not appropriate to directly correspond the ranks of the army with the ranks of local cadres. In addition, there are multiple levels of officer ranks, including the main battalion level, deputy regiment level, main regiment level, deputy division level, full division level, deputy army level, main army level, deputy theater level, and main theater level. Therefore, if we want to compare the rank and size relationship between military cadres and local cadres, we must use the rank of officer to correspond to the rank of local cadre.
In fact, there is no one-to-one correspondence between military ranks and local ranks. Taking major generals as an example, before the reform of the rank system in 2018, major generals were awarded to the rank of full division, deputy army, army and deputy theater level. This means that even major generals have four different ranks corresponding to them. Therefore, it is not reasonable to directly use a grade corresponding to the place in the future. Moreover, it is very rare for a full division to be awarded the rank of major general, and only military attachés stationed abroad and regular divisional officers of peacekeeping forces may be promoted to the rank of major general, and in other cases, almost all officers at the full division level are senior colonels.
Therefore, although the rank of major general corresponds to four ranks, in practice there are only three common situations, namely the deputy army level, the full army level and the deputy theater level. Even if one rank is reduced, the major general still corresponds to three different ranks, so comparisons must be made in conjunction with ranks, not just ranks.
After the reform of the military rank system in 2018, the rank of officers and the military rank implemented a one-to-one correspondence, and the situation of high military ranks was abolished. Officers at the division level were uniformly promoted to major colonel, officers at the deputy and full army levels were promoted to major general, and officials at the deputy theater level were promoted to lieutenant general. Under this system, major generals still correspond to two different ranks, namely deputy and full army. Therefore, if you want to compare the ranks of military cadres and local cadres, it is still necessary to combine the ranks and ranks for comparison.
There is a popular saying of "major general rank" and "officer at least general", but both statements are false. Because major general is a military rank, not a rank or position. The ranks are the division level, deputy army level, full army level, deputy theater level, etc. mentioned above. Many people tend to confuse the concepts of rank, rank and position, but they are three different concepts, and although there is a correspondence, they cannot be confused.
Similarly, it is incorrect to confuse the position of an officer with his rank. For example, the commander of an army group holds the position of commander and the rank is major general. It can be said that he is an "officer to the commander", but it cannot be said that he is an "officer at least a general". For a general-officer who served as the commander of the theater of operations, it can be said that he served as "officer to theater commander", but it cannot be said that he served as "officer to the commander".
Therefore, the position, rank and rank of an officer are three different but related concepts that should not be confused. The comparison of ranks between military and local cadres should take into account a combination of these concepts, not just military rank. In this area, ensuring accurate comparisons is crucial.
The above content and materials are derived from the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or allude to any real country, political system, organization, race, individual. The above does not mean that the author of this article endorses the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising above or related to any of the above, nor does it assume any direct or indirect legal liability.